风险管理工具,用于改善现有建筑物上的建设项目的项目流程

IF 0.6 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Z. Sigmund, M. Radujković
{"title":"风险管理工具,用于改善现有建筑物上的建设项目的项目流程","authors":"Z. Sigmund, M. Radujković","doi":"10.13167/2016.12.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Old cores of European cities make more than 35% of the entire building stock in Europe, which and often form the social, financial, and touristic centers of cities. These old buildings require constant investments in terms of renewal and preservation to retain their usefulness. Existing risk management tools do not provide sufficient support when managing these types of projects. Hence, previously developed risk breakdown structures (RBSs) for projects on existing buildings were extended to enable simpler project management and clear visibility of critical risks. Previous studies focused on RBSs for construction projects in general. Research with respect on real life projects showed that some risk sources posed a greater threat and had more risk triggers than other risk sources. This study identified critical risk sources with respect to existing RBS and conducted a further analysis of these risk sources. The results of the study examined the fully developed RBS for existing building construction projects with further structuring of specific risk sources. Furthermore, the study identified stakeholders and assigned their risk resolution responsibilities.","PeriodicalId":53887,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of the Faculty of Civil Engineering Osijek-e-GFOS","volume":"7 1","pages":"76-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk management tool for improving project flows for construction projects on existing buildings\",\"authors\":\"Z. Sigmund, M. Radujković\",\"doi\":\"10.13167/2016.12.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Old cores of European cities make more than 35% of the entire building stock in Europe, which and often form the social, financial, and touristic centers of cities. These old buildings require constant investments in terms of renewal and preservation to retain their usefulness. Existing risk management tools do not provide sufficient support when managing these types of projects. Hence, previously developed risk breakdown structures (RBSs) for projects on existing buildings were extended to enable simpler project management and clear visibility of critical risks. Previous studies focused on RBSs for construction projects in general. Research with respect on real life projects showed that some risk sources posed a greater threat and had more risk triggers than other risk sources. This study identified critical risk sources with respect to existing RBS and conducted a further analysis of these risk sources. The results of the study examined the fully developed RBS for existing building construction projects with further structuring of specific risk sources. Furthermore, the study identified stakeholders and assigned their risk resolution responsibilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Journal of the Faculty of Civil Engineering Osijek-e-GFOS\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"76-85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Journal of the Faculty of Civil Engineering Osijek-e-GFOS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13167/2016.12.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of the Faculty of Civil Engineering Osijek-e-GFOS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13167/2016.12.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

欧洲城市的老核心占欧洲总建筑存量的35%以上,它们往往形成城市的社会、金融和旅游中心。这些老建筑需要在更新和保护方面不断投资,以保持其实用性。当管理这些类型的项目时,现有的风险管理工具不能提供足够的支持。因此,先前为现有建筑物上的项目开发的风险分解结构(rbs)被扩展,以使项目管理更简单,并清楚地看到关键风险。以往的研究主要集中在一般建设项目的rbs上。对现实项目的研究表明,一些风险源比其他风险源具有更大的威胁和更多的风险触发因素。本研究确定了现有RBS的关键风险源,并对这些风险源进行了进一步分析。该研究的结果检查了现有建筑建设项目充分开发的RBS,并进一步构建了特定风险源。此外,该研究确定了利益相关者并分配了他们的风险解决责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk management tool for improving project flows for construction projects on existing buildings
Old cores of European cities make more than 35% of the entire building stock in Europe, which and often form the social, financial, and touristic centers of cities. These old buildings require constant investments in terms of renewal and preservation to retain their usefulness. Existing risk management tools do not provide sufficient support when managing these types of projects. Hence, previously developed risk breakdown structures (RBSs) for projects on existing buildings were extended to enable simpler project management and clear visibility of critical risks. Previous studies focused on RBSs for construction projects in general. Research with respect on real life projects showed that some risk sources posed a greater threat and had more risk triggers than other risk sources. This study identified critical risk sources with respect to existing RBS and conducted a further analysis of these risk sources. The results of the study examined the fully developed RBS for existing building construction projects with further structuring of specific risk sources. Furthermore, the study identified stakeholders and assigned their risk resolution responsibilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信