测试专家和外行人对景观偏好的差异

IF 0.8 Q3 ECONOMICS

Aestimum Pub Date : 2015-01-01 DOI:10.13128/AESTIMUM-16481

T. Tempesta, D. Vecchiato

{"title":"测试专家和外行人对景观偏好的差异","authors":"T. Tempesta, D. Vecchiato","doi":"10.13128/AESTIMUM-16481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Landscape Convention, ratified by 40 nations, has placed emphasis on the necessity that the value of the landscape is assessed by the population. However it is standard practice that a few experts decide which areas are of landscape interest and the transformations that are compatible with their conservation. To compare the landscape preferences of experts and lay people a study was done on the Po Delta Natural Park (Italy) using a psychophysical approach. In our case study the average scores of experts and lay people are not very different. However it was also ascertained that the experts evaluate the presence of some elements in a way that differs from lay people. As the responsibility for landscape policies is normally devolved to a few experts it would appear necessary that the preferences and opinions of lay people should always be carefully analysed.","PeriodicalId":53999,"journal":{"name":"Aestimum","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing the difference between experts’ and lay people’s landscape preferences\",\"authors\":\"T. Tempesta, D. Vecchiato\",\"doi\":\"10.13128/AESTIMUM-16481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The European Landscape Convention, ratified by 40 nations, has placed emphasis on the necessity that the value of the landscape is assessed by the population. However it is standard practice that a few experts decide which areas are of landscape interest and the transformations that are compatible with their conservation. To compare the landscape preferences of experts and lay people a study was done on the Po Delta Natural Park (Italy) using a psychophysical approach. In our case study the average scores of experts and lay people are not very different. However it was also ascertained that the experts evaluate the presence of some elements in a way that differs from lay people. As the responsibility for landscape policies is normally devolved to a few experts it would appear necessary that the preferences and opinions of lay people should always be carefully analysed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aestimum\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aestimum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13128/AESTIMUM-16481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aestimum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13128/AESTIMUM-16481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

摘要

由40个国家批准的《欧洲景观公约》强调，景观的价值必须由人口来评估。然而，标准做法是由一些专家决定哪些地区具有景观价值，以及哪些改造与保护相适应。为了比较专家和普通人的景观偏好，一项研究使用心理物理学的方法在波河三角洲自然公园(意大利)进行。在我们的案例研究中，专家和外行人的平均得分相差不大。然而，也确定了专家评估某些元素存在的方式与外行人不同。由于制定景观政策的责任通常由少数专家负责，因此似乎有必要始终仔细分析非专业人士的偏好和意见。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Testing the difference between experts’ and lay people’s landscape preferences

The European Landscape Convention, ratified by 40 nations, has placed emphasis on the necessity that the value of the landscape is assessed by the population. However it is standard practice that a few experts decide which areas are of landscape interest and the transformations that are compatible with their conservation. To compare the landscape preferences of experts and lay people a study was done on the Po Delta Natural Park (Italy) using a psychophysical approach. In our case study the average scores of experts and lay people are not very different. However it was also ascertained that the experts evaluate the presence of some elements in a way that differs from lay people. As the responsibility for landscape policies is normally devolved to a few experts it would appear necessary that the preferences and opinions of lay people should always be carefully analysed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Aestimum ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： Aestimum is a peer-reviewed Journal dedicated to the methodological study of appraisal and land economics. Established in 1976 by the Italian Association of Appraisers and Land Economists, which was legally recognized by Ministerial Decree, March 1993. Topics of interests comprise rural, urban and environmental appraisal, evaluation of public investments and land use planning. All the areas under discussion are addressed to the International scene. The interdisciplinary approach is one of the mainstays of this editorial project and all of the above mentioned topics are developed taking into consideration the economic, legal and urban planning aspects. Aestimum is biannual Journal and publishes articles both in Italian and English. Articles submitted are subjected to a double blind peer review process.