政治友谊:花园、蜜蜂和帕特里克·海登

IF 1.1 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Gabriella Slomp
{"title":"政治友谊:花园、蜜蜂和帕特里克·海登","authors":"Gabriella Slomp","doi":"10.1177/1755088220972133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is no doubt in my mind that my friend and colleague Patrick Hayden is a beeresearcher; in this short note I am going to make my case by concentrating on one example: his excellent article on political friendship (Hayden, 2015: 745−764). For sure, in that essay Patrick does not emulate ant-researchers and limit himself to relate thoughts and ideas about friendship exposed by others, nor does he imitate spider-writers and propose a conception of political friendship that neglects 2500 years of thinking about the relationship. Rather, like the Baconian bee, he combines expertise with ingenuity. To begin with, he offers an overview of the terrain that he intends to explore as well as an account of the weather conditions; he notes that recent times have witnessed a warming up of interest in two ideas that have a long history in the western tradition, namely the concepts of ‘friendship’ and ‘recognition’. He points out that there has been ‘little cross-fertilisation’ of the two themes in [international] political theory, and that his aim is ‘to contribute to the project of building conceptual bridges between theories of political friendship and theories of recognition’ (p. 746). As a second step, in search of the nectar of friendship and recognition, Patrick flies over large fields and meadows; he explores Cicero’s hortus, Aquinas’ orchard, Montaigne’s secret backyard, Kant’s landscaping grounds, Hegel’s national park; in all these places, and others, he finds the tendency of describing friendship as a relationship of self and other:","PeriodicalId":44237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Political Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1755088220972133","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political friendship: Gardens, bees and Patrick Hayden\",\"authors\":\"Gabriella Slomp\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1755088220972133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is no doubt in my mind that my friend and colleague Patrick Hayden is a beeresearcher; in this short note I am going to make my case by concentrating on one example: his excellent article on political friendship (Hayden, 2015: 745−764). For sure, in that essay Patrick does not emulate ant-researchers and limit himself to relate thoughts and ideas about friendship exposed by others, nor does he imitate spider-writers and propose a conception of political friendship that neglects 2500 years of thinking about the relationship. Rather, like the Baconian bee, he combines expertise with ingenuity. To begin with, he offers an overview of the terrain that he intends to explore as well as an account of the weather conditions; he notes that recent times have witnessed a warming up of interest in two ideas that have a long history in the western tradition, namely the concepts of ‘friendship’ and ‘recognition’. He points out that there has been ‘little cross-fertilisation’ of the two themes in [international] political theory, and that his aim is ‘to contribute to the project of building conceptual bridges between theories of political friendship and theories of recognition’ (p. 746). As a second step, in search of the nectar of friendship and recognition, Patrick flies over large fields and meadows; he explores Cicero’s hortus, Aquinas’ orchard, Montaigne’s secret backyard, Kant’s landscaping grounds, Hegel’s national park; in all these places, and others, he finds the tendency of describing friendship as a relationship of self and other:\",\"PeriodicalId\":44237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Political Theory\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1755088220972133\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Political Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088220972133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Political Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088220972133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

毫无疑问,我的朋友兼同事帕特里克·海登(Patrick Hayden)是一位啤酒研究员;在这篇短文中,我将通过一个例子来说明我的观点:他关于政治友谊的优秀文章(Hayden, 2015: 745−764)。可以肯定的是,在那篇文章中,帕特里克并没有模仿反蚁研究者,把自己局限于别人所揭示的关于友谊的想法和观点,他也没有模仿蜘蛛作家,提出一个政治友谊的概念,忽略了2500年来对这种关系的思考。相反,就像培根蜜蜂一样,他将专业知识与创造力结合起来。首先,他提供了地形的概述,他打算探索以及天气条件的帐户;他指出,近年来,人们对西方传统中历史悠久的两个概念——“友谊”和“认可”——的兴趣有所升温。他指出,在[国际]政治理论中,这两个主题“很少相互融合”,他的目标是“为在政治友谊理论和承认理论之间建立概念桥梁的项目做出贡献”(第746页)。第二步,为了寻找友谊和认可的甘露,帕特里克飞过大片的田野和草地;他探索了西塞罗的植物园、阿奎那的果园、蒙田的秘密后院、康德的园林园地、黑格尔的国家公园;在所有这些地方,以及其他地方,他发现了一种将友谊描述为自我与他人关系的倾向:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Political friendship: Gardens, bees and Patrick Hayden
There is no doubt in my mind that my friend and colleague Patrick Hayden is a beeresearcher; in this short note I am going to make my case by concentrating on one example: his excellent article on political friendship (Hayden, 2015: 745−764). For sure, in that essay Patrick does not emulate ant-researchers and limit himself to relate thoughts and ideas about friendship exposed by others, nor does he imitate spider-writers and propose a conception of political friendship that neglects 2500 years of thinking about the relationship. Rather, like the Baconian bee, he combines expertise with ingenuity. To begin with, he offers an overview of the terrain that he intends to explore as well as an account of the weather conditions; he notes that recent times have witnessed a warming up of interest in two ideas that have a long history in the western tradition, namely the concepts of ‘friendship’ and ‘recognition’. He points out that there has been ‘little cross-fertilisation’ of the two themes in [international] political theory, and that his aim is ‘to contribute to the project of building conceptual bridges between theories of political friendship and theories of recognition’ (p. 746). As a second step, in search of the nectar of friendship and recognition, Patrick flies over large fields and meadows; he explores Cicero’s hortus, Aquinas’ orchard, Montaigne’s secret backyard, Kant’s landscaping grounds, Hegel’s national park; in all these places, and others, he finds the tendency of describing friendship as a relationship of self and other:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信