法院拒绝撤销基于不可委托职责的索赔-GB诉内政部(高等法院,2015年3月31日Coulson J)

J. Mead
{"title":"法院拒绝撤销基于不可委托职责的索赔-GB诉内政部(高等法院,2015年3月31日Coulson J)","authors":"J. Mead","doi":"10.1177/1356262216659423B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"nosed with ALD. So far as B was concerned, his condition was too far advanced for a stem cell transplant to be of any benefit to him and he died in April 2012. Following the diagnosis of A and B, X was seen in clinic and it was at this point that the consultant noted that the VLCFA test had not been performed. This was reordered and in August 2006, X was informed that the result was consistent with AMN. Genetic testing confirmed that diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":89664,"journal":{"name":"Clinical risk","volume":"21 1","pages":"129 - 131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1356262216659423B","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Court refuses to strike out claim founded on non-delegable duty —GB v Home Office (High Court, 31 March 2015 Coulson J)\",\"authors\":\"J. Mead\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1356262216659423B\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"nosed with ALD. So far as B was concerned, his condition was too far advanced for a stem cell transplant to be of any benefit to him and he died in April 2012. Following the diagnosis of A and B, X was seen in clinic and it was at this point that the consultant noted that the VLCFA test had not been performed. This was reordered and in August 2006, X was informed that the result was consistent with AMN. Genetic testing confirmed that diagnosis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical risk\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"129 - 131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1356262216659423B\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical risk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356262216659423B\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356262216659423B","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鼻子里有ALD。就B而言,他的病情过于严重,干细胞移植对他没有任何好处,他于2012年4月去世。在诊断出A和B后,X出现在诊所,此时顾问注意到未进行VLCFA测试。这是重新订购,并在2006年8月,X被告知结果与AMN一致。基因检测证实了这一诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Court refuses to strike out claim founded on non-delegable duty —GB v Home Office (High Court, 31 March 2015 Coulson J)
nosed with ALD. So far as B was concerned, his condition was too far advanced for a stem cell transplant to be of any benefit to him and he died in April 2012. Following the diagnosis of A and B, X was seen in clinic and it was at this point that the consultant noted that the VLCFA test had not been performed. This was reordered and in August 2006, X was informed that the result was consistent with AMN. Genetic testing confirmed that diagnosis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信