医学奥秘

P. Atkinson, M. Reid, P. Sheldrake
{"title":"医学奥秘","authors":"P. Atkinson, M. Reid, P. Sheldrake","doi":"10.1177/003803857700400301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper begins with a discussion of the concepts of \"Indeterminacy\" and \"Technicality\" in the context of a sociology of the professions. It is argued that the definition and preservation of areas of indeterminate knowledge are central in the creation of claims to professional expertise. In the second part of the paper, this argument is illustrated by two case studies drawn from intersegmental negotiations and disputes within the medical profession in Britain: the dispute over the remuneration over General Practitioners, 1963-1965, and the debate over specialist registration, 1968-1969.","PeriodicalId":85554,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of work and occupations","volume":"149 1","pages":"243 - 280"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1977-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/003803857700400301","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical Mystique\",\"authors\":\"P. Atkinson, M. Reid, P. Sheldrake\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/003803857700400301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper begins with a discussion of the concepts of \\\"Indeterminacy\\\" and \\\"Technicality\\\" in the context of a sociology of the professions. It is argued that the definition and preservation of areas of indeterminate knowledge are central in the creation of claims to professional expertise. In the second part of the paper, this argument is illustrated by two case studies drawn from intersegmental negotiations and disputes within the medical profession in Britain: the dispute over the remuneration over General Practitioners, 1963-1965, and the debate over specialist registration, 1968-1969.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociology of work and occupations\",\"volume\":\"149 1\",\"pages\":\"243 - 280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1977-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/003803857700400301\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociology of work and occupations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857700400301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of work and occupations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857700400301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文首先在专业社会学的背景下讨论了“不确定性”和“技术性”的概念。有人认为,不确定知识领域的定义和保存是创造专业知识要求的核心。在论文的第二部分,这一论点是由两个案例研究,从部门间谈判和纠纷在英国的医疗行业:争议的报酬对全科医生,1963年至1965年,和辩论的专家注册,1968年至1969年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medical Mystique
The paper begins with a discussion of the concepts of "Indeterminacy" and "Technicality" in the context of a sociology of the professions. It is argued that the definition and preservation of areas of indeterminate knowledge are central in the creation of claims to professional expertise. In the second part of the paper, this argument is illustrated by two case studies drawn from intersegmental negotiations and disputes within the medical profession in Britain: the dispute over the remuneration over General Practitioners, 1963-1965, and the debate over specialist registration, 1968-1969.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信