书评:早期埃及王朝

IF 0.6 3区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Willem M. van Haarlem
{"title":"书评:早期埃及王朝","authors":"Willem M. van Haarlem","doi":"10.1177/030751330008600127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the Naqada III Period.' Another strange omission, in chapter 5, is the absence of any reference to the large temple at Tell el-Balarnun,? although it is mentioned on p. 39, with a reference to foundation deposits. Although the removal of the stone architecture originally erected at Qantir/Piramesse to San el-Hagar/Tanis is mentioned in the paragraph on Qantir on pp. 108-9, it is not discussed on pp. 112-13 in the description of Tanis itself. Contrary to what is stated on p.l13, the royal tombs there probably did have some superstructure, possibly in mudbrick, although it is not mentioned by the excavator, Pierre Montet. Returning to p. 109, 1 think that by now the probability of Tell ed-Dab'a being ancient Avaris can be amended to a near-certainty. The Austrian excavators of the site, incidentally, might be surprised to find themselves identified as 'Czech' in the caption of the upper right photograph on that page. Among other mistakes, one might note that on p. 47, the obviously Coptic inscription in the upper right photograph is described as 'Greek' in the caption, and on p. 142, the rock temple of el-Salamuni is not mentioned by name but is obviously referred to in the text on Akhmim. Although the bibliography on pp. 246-50 does not claim to be complete, and any selection must always be arbitrary, two more references at the very least should be added on p. 248-under 'The Role of the Common People in Worship', the study by G. Pinch, Votive Offerings to Hathor (Oxford, 1993), and under 'Middle Egypt: From Memphis to Asyut'on p. 249, the publications on the Ashmunein excavations by the British Museum Expedition. In summary, this is a practical book for the English-speaking market, although readers of German are better served elsewhere. WILLEM M. VAN HAARLEM","PeriodicalId":54147,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF EGYPTIAN ARCHAEOLOGY","volume":"86 1","pages":"188 - 189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/030751330008600127","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Early Dynastic Egypt\",\"authors\":\"Willem M. van Haarlem\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/030751330008600127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"the Naqada III Period.' Another strange omission, in chapter 5, is the absence of any reference to the large temple at Tell el-Balarnun,? although it is mentioned on p. 39, with a reference to foundation deposits. Although the removal of the stone architecture originally erected at Qantir/Piramesse to San el-Hagar/Tanis is mentioned in the paragraph on Qantir on pp. 108-9, it is not discussed on pp. 112-13 in the description of Tanis itself. Contrary to what is stated on p.l13, the royal tombs there probably did have some superstructure, possibly in mudbrick, although it is not mentioned by the excavator, Pierre Montet. Returning to p. 109, 1 think that by now the probability of Tell ed-Dab'a being ancient Avaris can be amended to a near-certainty. The Austrian excavators of the site, incidentally, might be surprised to find themselves identified as 'Czech' in the caption of the upper right photograph on that page. Among other mistakes, one might note that on p. 47, the obviously Coptic inscription in the upper right photograph is described as 'Greek' in the caption, and on p. 142, the rock temple of el-Salamuni is not mentioned by name but is obviously referred to in the text on Akhmim. Although the bibliography on pp. 246-50 does not claim to be complete, and any selection must always be arbitrary, two more references at the very least should be added on p. 248-under 'The Role of the Common People in Worship', the study by G. Pinch, Votive Offerings to Hathor (Oxford, 1993), and under 'Middle Egypt: From Memphis to Asyut'on p. 249, the publications on the Ashmunein excavations by the British Museum Expedition. In summary, this is a practical book for the English-speaking market, although readers of German are better served elsewhere. WILLEM M. VAN HAARLEM\",\"PeriodicalId\":54147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF EGYPTIAN ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"188 - 189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/030751330008600127\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF EGYPTIAN ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/030751330008600127\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF EGYPTIAN ARCHAEOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/030751330008600127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

那卡达三世时期。”第五章还有一个奇怪的遗漏,就是没有提到泰尔巴拉农的大神庙。虽然在第39页提到了,并提到了地基沉积物。虽然在第108-9页关于Qantir的段落中提到了将最初竖立在Qantir/Piramesse的石头建筑移至San el-Hagar/Tanis,但在第112-13页对Tanis本身的描述中没有讨论。与p.13所述相反,那里的皇家陵墓可能确实有一些上层建筑,可能是用泥砖建造的,尽管挖掘机皮埃尔·蒙特没有提到。回到第109页,我认为现在Tell ed-Dab'a是古代阿瓦里斯人的可能性几乎可以确定。顺便说一句,奥地利的挖掘者可能会惊讶地发现,在该页右上方照片的标题中,他们被认定为“捷克人”。在其他错误中,人们可能会注意到,在第47页,右上方照片中明显的科普特题词在标题中被描述为“希腊”,而在第142页,el-Salamuni的岩石神庙没有提到名字,但在关于Akhmim的文本中显然提到了。虽然246-50页的参考书目并不声称是完整的,而且任何选择都必须是任意的,但至少应该在248页的“普通人在崇拜中的作用”下加上两个参考文献,G. Pinch的研究,对哈索尔的献祭(牛津,1993),以及在249页的“中埃及:从孟菲斯到阿斯尤特”下,大英博物馆探险队关于阿什穆因挖掘的出版物。总之,这是一本针对英语市场的实用书籍,尽管其他地方的德语读者会得到更好的服务。威廉·m·范哈勒姆
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book Review: Early Dynastic Egypt
the Naqada III Period.' Another strange omission, in chapter 5, is the absence of any reference to the large temple at Tell el-Balarnun,? although it is mentioned on p. 39, with a reference to foundation deposits. Although the removal of the stone architecture originally erected at Qantir/Piramesse to San el-Hagar/Tanis is mentioned in the paragraph on Qantir on pp. 108-9, it is not discussed on pp. 112-13 in the description of Tanis itself. Contrary to what is stated on p.l13, the royal tombs there probably did have some superstructure, possibly in mudbrick, although it is not mentioned by the excavator, Pierre Montet. Returning to p. 109, 1 think that by now the probability of Tell ed-Dab'a being ancient Avaris can be amended to a near-certainty. The Austrian excavators of the site, incidentally, might be surprised to find themselves identified as 'Czech' in the caption of the upper right photograph on that page. Among other mistakes, one might note that on p. 47, the obviously Coptic inscription in the upper right photograph is described as 'Greek' in the caption, and on p. 142, the rock temple of el-Salamuni is not mentioned by name but is obviously referred to in the text on Akhmim. Although the bibliography on pp. 246-50 does not claim to be complete, and any selection must always be arbitrary, two more references at the very least should be added on p. 248-under 'The Role of the Common People in Worship', the study by G. Pinch, Votive Offerings to Hathor (Oxford, 1993), and under 'Middle Egypt: From Memphis to Asyut'on p. 249, the publications on the Ashmunein excavations by the British Museum Expedition. In summary, this is a practical book for the English-speaking market, although readers of German are better served elsewhere. WILLEM M. VAN HAARLEM
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信