iseal联盟与跨国可持续标准的行政治理

IF 1.7 Q3 Social Sciences
P. Paiement
{"title":"iseal联盟与跨国可持续标准的行政治理","authors":"P. Paiement","doi":"10.1163/22112596-02102004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article concerns the role of the ISEAL Alliance in formulating and enforcing administrative governance principles and procedures among sustainability standard-setting bodies. By utilizing the frameworks of meta-regulation and global administrative law, this article assesses whether ISEAL has been able to develop a regulatory capacity in practice. After first categorizing administrative governance norms found in these codes as ‘participatory’, ‘transparency’, or ‘reasoned decision-making’, this article offers an empirical analysis of the experiences of ISEAL’s members with respect to participation drivers, code compliance, their roles in writing the codes, and concerns about the future developments in ISEAL. In light of this empirical analysis, it is suggested that ISEAL’s regulatory capacities have been overstated. Finally, a growing emphasis on the impacts of sustainability standards is discussed in relation to problems it raises for the future significance of administrative governance principles and the accountability of sustainability standard-setting bodies.","PeriodicalId":38415,"journal":{"name":"Tilburg Law Review-Journal of International and Comparative Law","volume":"21 1","pages":"144-168"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/22112596-02102004","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"iseal Alliance and the Administrative Governance of Transnational Sustainability Standards\",\"authors\":\"P. Paiement\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22112596-02102004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article concerns the role of the ISEAL Alliance in formulating and enforcing administrative governance principles and procedures among sustainability standard-setting bodies. By utilizing the frameworks of meta-regulation and global administrative law, this article assesses whether ISEAL has been able to develop a regulatory capacity in practice. After first categorizing administrative governance norms found in these codes as ‘participatory’, ‘transparency’, or ‘reasoned decision-making’, this article offers an empirical analysis of the experiences of ISEAL’s members with respect to participation drivers, code compliance, their roles in writing the codes, and concerns about the future developments in ISEAL. In light of this empirical analysis, it is suggested that ISEAL’s regulatory capacities have been overstated. Finally, a growing emphasis on the impacts of sustainability standards is discussed in relation to problems it raises for the future significance of administrative governance principles and the accountability of sustainability standard-setting bodies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tilburg Law Review-Journal of International and Comparative Law\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"144-168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/22112596-02102004\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tilburg Law Review-Journal of International and Comparative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22112596-02102004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tilburg Law Review-Journal of International and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22112596-02102004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

本文涉及ISEAL联盟在可持续性标准制定机构之间制定和执行行政治理原则和程序方面的作用。通过利用元监管和全球行政法的框架,本文评估了ISEAL是否能够在实践中发展监管能力。在首先将这些准则中的行政治理规范分类为“参与性”、“透明度”或“理性决策”之后,本文对ISEAL成员的经验进行了实证分析,这些经验涉及参与驱动因素、准则遵守、他们在编写准则中的角色以及对ISEAL未来发展的关注。根据这一实证分析,有人认为ISEAL的监管能力被夸大了。最后,讨论了日益强调可持续性标准的影响的问题,这些问题涉及行政治理原则的未来意义和可持续性标准制定机构的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
iseal Alliance and the Administrative Governance of Transnational Sustainability Standards
This article concerns the role of the ISEAL Alliance in formulating and enforcing administrative governance principles and procedures among sustainability standard-setting bodies. By utilizing the frameworks of meta-regulation and global administrative law, this article assesses whether ISEAL has been able to develop a regulatory capacity in practice. After first categorizing administrative governance norms found in these codes as ‘participatory’, ‘transparency’, or ‘reasoned decision-making’, this article offers an empirical analysis of the experiences of ISEAL’s members with respect to participation drivers, code compliance, their roles in writing the codes, and concerns about the future developments in ISEAL. In light of this empirical analysis, it is suggested that ISEAL’s regulatory capacities have been overstated. Finally, a growing emphasis on the impacts of sustainability standards is discussed in relation to problems it raises for the future significance of administrative governance principles and the accountability of sustainability standard-setting bodies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信