束理论与不可分辨的同一性

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Philip Swenson, Bradley Rettler
{"title":"束理论与不可分辨的同一性","authors":"Philip Swenson, Bradley Rettler","doi":"10.11612/resphil.1793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A and B continue their conversation concerning the Identity of Indiscernibles. Both are aware of recent critiques of the principle that haven’t received replies; B summarizes those critiques, and A offers the replies that are due. B then raises","PeriodicalId":44475,"journal":{"name":"Res Philosophica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bundle Theory and the Identity of Indiscernibles\",\"authors\":\"Philip Swenson, Bradley Rettler\",\"doi\":\"10.11612/resphil.1793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A and B continue their conversation concerning the Identity of Indiscernibles. Both are aware of recent critiques of the principle that haven’t received replies; B summarizes those critiques, and A offers the replies that are due. B then raises\",\"PeriodicalId\":44475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Res Philosophica\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Res Philosophica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.1793\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Res Philosophica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.1793","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

A和B继续他们关于隐形人身份的谈话。他们都知道最近对这一原则的批评尚未得到回应;B总结这些批评,A给出应有的答复。B则提出
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bundle Theory and the Identity of Indiscernibles
A and B continue their conversation concerning the Identity of Indiscernibles. Both are aware of recent critiques of the principle that haven’t received replies; B summarizes those critiques, and A offers the replies that are due. B then raises
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Res Philosophica
Res Philosophica PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信