卡拉布里亚的希腊和罗马不一致

IF 0.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Georg F. K. Höhn, Giuseppina Silvestri, M. O. Squillaci
{"title":"卡拉布里亚的希腊和罗马不一致","authors":"Georg F. K. Höhn, Giuseppina Silvestri, M. O. Squillaci","doi":"10.1163/15699846-01702002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The term ‘unagreement’ describes configurations with an apparent person-mismatch between a typically definite plural subject and non-third person verbal agreement found in several null subject languages. Previous works have suggested that languages which have an obligatory definite article in adnominal pronoun constructions (APCs) allow unagreement (cf. standard modern Greek emeis oi glossologoi “we (the) linguists”), while languages that rule out definite articles in APCs do not allow unagreement constructions (cf. standard Italian noi (*i) linguisti). This article presents new evidence from Calabrian Greek (Greko), which corresponds to the predictions for other varieties of Greek, and two southern Italian Romance varieties (northern and southern Calabrese): these varieties exhibit Italian-type APCs but still allow unagreement, contrary to expectations. We discuss how the Romance data may be accommodated by extending a previous account of unagreement and propose that the hybrid pattern observed in the Italo-Romance varieties is a result of historical contact with local Greek varieties.","PeriodicalId":42386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Greek Linguistics","volume":"12 1","pages":"263-292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15699846-01702002","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Greek and Romance unagreement in Calabria\",\"authors\":\"Georg F. K. Höhn, Giuseppina Silvestri, M. O. Squillaci\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15699846-01702002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The term ‘unagreement’ describes configurations with an apparent person-mismatch between a typically definite plural subject and non-third person verbal agreement found in several null subject languages. Previous works have suggested that languages which have an obligatory definite article in adnominal pronoun constructions (APCs) allow unagreement (cf. standard modern Greek emeis oi glossologoi “we (the) linguists”), while languages that rule out definite articles in APCs do not allow unagreement constructions (cf. standard Italian noi (*i) linguisti). This article presents new evidence from Calabrian Greek (Greko), which corresponds to the predictions for other varieties of Greek, and two southern Italian Romance varieties (northern and southern Calabrese): these varieties exhibit Italian-type APCs but still allow unagreement, contrary to expectations. We discuss how the Romance data may be accommodated by extending a previous account of unagreement and propose that the hybrid pattern observed in the Italo-Romance varieties is a result of historical contact with local Greek varieties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Greek Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"263-292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15699846-01702002\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Greek Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15699846-01702002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Greek Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15699846-01702002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

术语“不一致”描述了在几种空主语语言中发现的典型的确定复数主语和非第三人称口头一致之间明显的人称不匹配的配置。先前的研究表明,在副词代词结构(apc)中有强制性定冠词的语言允许不一致(参见标准现代希腊语emeis oi glossologoi“我们(语言学家)”),而在apc中排除定冠词的语言不允许不一致结构(参见标准意大利语noi (*i) linguisti)。本文提出了来自卡拉布里亚希腊语(Greko)的新证据,这与对其他希腊语品种的预测相对应,以及两个意大利南部罗曼语系品种(北部和南部卡拉布雷斯):这些品种表现出意大利式apc,但仍然存在不一致,与预期相反。我们讨论了罗曼语数据如何通过扩展先前的不一致的解释来适应,并提出在意大利-罗曼语品种中观察到的杂交模式是与当地希腊品种的历史接触的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Greek and Romance unagreement in Calabria
The term ‘unagreement’ describes configurations with an apparent person-mismatch between a typically definite plural subject and non-third person verbal agreement found in several null subject languages. Previous works have suggested that languages which have an obligatory definite article in adnominal pronoun constructions (APCs) allow unagreement (cf. standard modern Greek emeis oi glossologoi “we (the) linguists”), while languages that rule out definite articles in APCs do not allow unagreement constructions (cf. standard Italian noi (*i) linguisti). This article presents new evidence from Calabrian Greek (Greko), which corresponds to the predictions for other varieties of Greek, and two southern Italian Romance varieties (northern and southern Calabrese): these varieties exhibit Italian-type APCs but still allow unagreement, contrary to expectations. We discuss how the Romance data may be accommodated by extending a previous account of unagreement and propose that the hybrid pattern observed in the Italo-Romance varieties is a result of historical contact with local Greek varieties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Greek Linguistics
Journal of Greek Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
42 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信