领土政策、欧洲危机和边界。欧盟和巴西的比较前景

A. A. Rückert
{"title":"领土政策、欧洲危机和边界。欧盟和巴西的比较前景","authors":"A. A. Rückert","doi":"10.11606/ISSN.2179-0892.GEOUSP.2013.75438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses compared territorial policies between European Union and Brazil. The EU’s Territorial Cohesion Policy, based on the New Regionalism, faces the scenario of the European economic crisis during the budget review for 2014-2020 during the making of the Europe 2020 strategy. The OECD’s market predominant approach for endogenous or place-based development policies of the European Union’s Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy (DG Regio) has influenced countries like Brazil. At the same time when the European Parliament renews its support to regions in transition and to the cross-border ones, the reality of European borders shows a relatively pessimistic scenario, despite important experiences of territorial management like in the Upper Rhine region between France, Germany and Switzerland. Brazil is undergoing a revision of its National Regional Development Policy Regional (PNDR), keeping OECD’s approaches, while adapts its policies for borders and territorial defense.","PeriodicalId":30759,"journal":{"name":"GEOUSP Espaco e Tempo","volume":"73 1","pages":"55-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"POLÍTICAS TERRITORIAIS, CRISE EUROPEIA E FRONTEIRAS. PERSPECTIVAS COMPARADAS ENTRE A UNIÃO EUROPEIA E O BRASIL\",\"authors\":\"A. A. Rückert\",\"doi\":\"10.11606/ISSN.2179-0892.GEOUSP.2013.75438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article discusses compared territorial policies between European Union and Brazil. The EU’s Territorial Cohesion Policy, based on the New Regionalism, faces the scenario of the European economic crisis during the budget review for 2014-2020 during the making of the Europe 2020 strategy. The OECD’s market predominant approach for endogenous or place-based development policies of the European Union’s Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy (DG Regio) has influenced countries like Brazil. At the same time when the European Parliament renews its support to regions in transition and to the cross-border ones, the reality of European borders shows a relatively pessimistic scenario, despite important experiences of territorial management like in the Upper Rhine region between France, Germany and Switzerland. Brazil is undergoing a revision of its National Regional Development Policy Regional (PNDR), keeping OECD’s approaches, while adapts its policies for borders and territorial defense.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GEOUSP Espaco e Tempo\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"55-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GEOUSP Espaco e Tempo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11606/ISSN.2179-0892.GEOUSP.2013.75438\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GEOUSP Espaco e Tempo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/ISSN.2179-0892.GEOUSP.2013.75438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对欧盟与巴西的领土政策进行了比较。以新地方主义为基础的欧盟领土凝聚政策在制定“欧洲2020”战略的2014-2020年预算审查中面临欧洲经济危机的情景。经合组织对欧盟区域和城市政策总司(DG Regio)的内生或基于地方的发展政策采取的以市场为主导的方法影响了巴西等国家。与此同时,当欧洲议会重新支持转型地区和跨境地区时,尽管在领土管理方面有重要的经验,如法国、德国和瑞士之间的上莱茵河地区,但欧洲边界的现实显示出相对悲观的情况。巴西正在修订其国家区域发展政策区域(PNDR),保留经合组织的方法,同时调整其边境和领土防御政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
POLÍTICAS TERRITORIAIS, CRISE EUROPEIA E FRONTEIRAS. PERSPECTIVAS COMPARADAS ENTRE A UNIÃO EUROPEIA E O BRASIL
The article discusses compared territorial policies between European Union and Brazil. The EU’s Territorial Cohesion Policy, based on the New Regionalism, faces the scenario of the European economic crisis during the budget review for 2014-2020 during the making of the Europe 2020 strategy. The OECD’s market predominant approach for endogenous or place-based development policies of the European Union’s Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy (DG Regio) has influenced countries like Brazil. At the same time when the European Parliament renews its support to regions in transition and to the cross-border ones, the reality of European borders shows a relatively pessimistic scenario, despite important experiences of territorial management like in the Upper Rhine region between France, Germany and Switzerland. Brazil is undergoing a revision of its National Regional Development Policy Regional (PNDR), keeping OECD’s approaches, while adapts its policies for borders and territorial defense.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信