优质及堕胎服务

Q Medicine

Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care Pub Date : 2016-12-22 DOI:10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101580

J. Lord

{"title":"优质及堕胎服务","authors":"J. Lord","doi":"10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors of the article ‘Identifying indicators for quality abortion care: a systematic literature review’ in this journal issue1 deserve admiration for having proposed an academic solution to address the paucity of work in this area. It is telling that only 21 relevant publications could be identified in the literature, despite abortion being such a common health need that a significant proportion of the population will access. In other areas of medicine the quality agenda has become mainstream. In contrast, those involved in abortion care frequently work in isolation and have had to concentrate on operating in difficult legal and social environments where defined quality indicators could be used against them further to restrict access. It is therefore heartening to see this article published …","PeriodicalId":15734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care","volume":"43 1","pages":"16 - 17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101580","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality and abortion services\",\"authors\":\"J. Lord\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors of the article ‘Identifying indicators for quality abortion care: a systematic literature review’ in this journal issue1 deserve admiration for having proposed an academic solution to address the paucity of work in this area. It is telling that only 21 relevant publications could be identified in the literature, despite abortion being such a common health need that a significant proportion of the population will access. In other areas of medicine the quality agenda has become mainstream. In contrast, those involved in abortion care frequently work in isolation and have had to concentrate on operating in difficult legal and social environments where defined quality indicators could be used against them further to restrict access. It is therefore heartening to see this article published …\",\"PeriodicalId\":15734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"16 - 17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101580\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101580\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

《确定高质量堕胎护理的指标:系统文献综述》一文的作者值得钦佩，因为他们提出了一个学术解决方案，以解决这一领域工作的缺乏。值得注意的是，尽管堕胎是一项普遍的健康需求，很大一部分人口将获得堕胎服务，但在文献中只能确定21种相关出版物。在医学的其他领域，质量议程已成为主流。相比之下，那些参与堕胎护理的人往往是孤立地工作，不得不集中精力在困难的法律和社会环境中开展工作，在这些环境中，确定的质量指标可能被用来进一步限制她们获得服务。因此，看到这篇文章发表是令人振奋的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Quality and abortion services

The authors of the article ‘Identifying indicators for quality abortion care: a systematic literature review’ in this journal issue1 deserve admiration for having proposed an academic solution to address the paucity of work in this area. It is telling that only 21 relevant publications could be identified in the literature, despite abortion being such a common health need that a significant proportion of the population will access. In other areas of medicine the quality agenda has become mainstream. In contrast, those involved in abortion care frequently work in isolation and have had to concentrate on operating in difficult legal and social environments where defined quality indicators could be used against them further to restrict access. It is therefore heartening to see this article published …

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊