康德的国家占统治地位吗?:自由和多数统治

IF 0.4 4区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Ratio Pub Date : 2023-03-28 DOI:10.1111/rati.12366

M. Gregory

{"title":"康德的国家占统治地位吗?:自由和多数统治","authors":"M. Gregory","doi":"10.1111/rati.12366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, scholars have criticized what they call the “Kantian-Republican” thesis of freedom as non-domination. The main complaint is that domination is unavoidable. This concern can be separated into the problem of state domination, which suggests that the state's intervening powers necessarily dominate its citizens, and the problem of majority domination, which suggests that the People necessarily dominate individual citizen as a result of the potential to form dominating majorities.","PeriodicalId":46553,"journal":{"name":"Ratio","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the Kantian state dominate?: Freedom and majoritarian rule\",\"authors\":\"M. Gregory\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/rati.12366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently, scholars have criticized what they call the “Kantian-Republican” thesis of freedom as non-domination. The main complaint is that domination is unavoidable. This concern can be separated into the problem of state domination, which suggests that the state's intervening powers necessarily dominate its citizens, and the problem of majority domination, which suggests that the People necessarily dominate individual citizen as a result of the potential to form dominating majorities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ratio\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ratio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12366\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ratio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12366","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

最近，学者们批评了他们称之为“康德-共和主义”的自由论，即非统治论。主要的抱怨是，统治是不可避免的。这种关注可以分为国家统治的问题，这表明国家的干预权力必然支配其公民，以及多数统治的问题，这表明人民必然统治个别公民，因为有可能形成占统治地位的多数。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Does the Kantian state dominate?: Freedom and majoritarian rule

Recently, scholars have criticized what they call the “Kantian-Republican” thesis of freedom as non-domination. The main complaint is that domination is unavoidable. This concern can be separated into the problem of state domination, which suggests that the state's intervening powers necessarily dominate its citizens, and the problem of majority domination, which suggests that the People necessarily dominate individual citizen as a result of the potential to form dominating majorities.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Ratio PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Ratio publishes work of a high quality on a wide variety of topics. It encourages articles which meet the highest standards of philosophical expertise, while at the same time remaining accessible to readers from a broad range of philosophical disciplines. The journal"s main emphasis is on analytic philosophy, but it also includes work from other traditions.