两种不同脱敏清漆降低牙齿敏感性的有效性:一项随机双盲临床试验。

ORAL and Implantology Pub Date : 2016-10-01 DOI:10.11138/orl/2016.9.4.185

G. Nardi, S. Sabatini, D. Lauritano, F. Silvestre, M. Petruzzi

{"title":"两种不同脱敏清漆降低牙齿敏感性的有效性:一项随机双盲临床试验。","authors":"G. Nardi, S. Sabatini, D. Lauritano, F. Silvestre, M. Petruzzi","doi":"10.11138/orl/2016.9.4.185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nThe aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two different desensitizing varnishes.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nNinety healthy adults suffering from tooth sensitivity were divided into three groups. Two different varnishes were used for the study: Fluor Protector S, containing 7700 ppm fluoride (group I), and Cervitec F, containing 1400 ppm fluoride and 0.3% chlorhexidine (group II). A placebo containing water and ethanol was applied for the third group. Tooth sensitivity was collected according the Schiff' scale at baseline and after 30 and 90 days.\n\n\nRESULTS\nGroup I and group II improved with statistically significant results. Group III did not show any improvements.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nDesensitizing varnishes are a valid treatment for tooth hypersensitivity.","PeriodicalId":38303,"journal":{"name":"ORAL and Implantology","volume":"9 4 1","pages":"185-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11138/orl/2016.9.4.185","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of two different desensitizing varnishes in reducing tooth sensitivity: a randomized double-blind clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"G. Nardi, S. Sabatini, D. Lauritano, F. Silvestre, M. Petruzzi\",\"doi\":\"10.11138/orl/2016.9.4.185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\nThe aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two different desensitizing varnishes.\\n\\n\\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\\nNinety healthy adults suffering from tooth sensitivity were divided into three groups. Two different varnishes were used for the study: Fluor Protector S, containing 7700 ppm fluoride (group I), and Cervitec F, containing 1400 ppm fluoride and 0.3% chlorhexidine (group II). A placebo containing water and ethanol was applied for the third group. Tooth sensitivity was collected according the Schiff' scale at baseline and after 30 and 90 days.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nGroup I and group II improved with statistically significant results. Group III did not show any improvements.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nDesensitizing varnishes are a valid treatment for tooth hypersensitivity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ORAL and Implantology\",\"volume\":\"9 4 1\",\"pages\":\"185-189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11138/orl/2016.9.4.185\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ORAL and Implantology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11138/orl/2016.9.4.185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORAL and Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11138/orl/2016.9.4.185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

摘要

目的评价和比较两种不同的脱敏清漆的效果。材料与方法90例健康成人牙齿敏感患者分为3组。研究中使用了两种不同的清漆:氟保护剂S，含7700 ppm氟化物(第一组)，Cervitec F，含1400 ppm氟化物和0.3%氯己定(第二组)。第三组使用含有水和乙醇的安慰剂。在基线和30、90 d后按希夫量表收集牙齿敏感性。结果1、2组患者疗效均有统计学意义。第三组没有任何改善。结论脱敏清漆是治疗牙齿过敏的有效方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Effectiveness of two different desensitizing varnishes in reducing tooth sensitivity: a randomized double-blind clinical trial.

PURPOSE The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two different desensitizing varnishes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ninety healthy adults suffering from tooth sensitivity were divided into three groups. Two different varnishes were used for the study: Fluor Protector S, containing 7700 ppm fluoride (group I), and Cervitec F, containing 1400 ppm fluoride and 0.3% chlorhexidine (group II). A placebo containing water and ethanol was applied for the third group. Tooth sensitivity was collected according the Schiff' scale at baseline and after 30 and 90 days. RESULTS Group I and group II improved with statistically significant results. Group III did not show any improvements. CONCLUSIONS Desensitizing varnishes are a valid treatment for tooth hypersensitivity.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ORAL and Implantology Dentistry-Dentistry (all)

自引率

0.00%

发文量