平庸再调查:自杀和强迫死亡文件的计算机内容分析。

V. J. Henken
{"title":"平庸再调查:自杀和强迫死亡文件的计算机内容分析。","authors":"V. J. Henken","doi":"10.1111/J.1943-278X.1976.TB00549.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Suicide and simulated notes and forced-death documents were processed on the Harvard III Psycho-Sociological Dictionary. For each text, frequencies of related words were generated; these were contrasted with each other and with baseline data using z scores. The results indicated that the suicidal groups were more \"deviant.\" Other findings are concreteness and constriction of focus for suicides--a pattern suggesting denial just prior to the deed. The forced-death group seemed to be more meaningfully in contact with life and aware of responsibility. The stimulated group appeared to be fabricating a popular stereotype rather than exhibiting empathy. Implications were discussed.","PeriodicalId":76567,"journal":{"name":"Suicide","volume":"6 1 1","pages":"36-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1976-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1943-278X.1976.TB00549.X","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Banality reinvestigated: A computer-based content analysis of suicidal and forced death documents.\",\"authors\":\"V. J. Henken\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1943-278X.1976.TB00549.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Suicide and simulated notes and forced-death documents were processed on the Harvard III Psycho-Sociological Dictionary. For each text, frequencies of related words were generated; these were contrasted with each other and with baseline data using z scores. The results indicated that the suicidal groups were more \\\"deviant.\\\" Other findings are concreteness and constriction of focus for suicides--a pattern suggesting denial just prior to the deed. The forced-death group seemed to be more meaningfully in contact with life and aware of responsibility. The stimulated group appeared to be fabricating a popular stereotype rather than exhibiting empathy. Implications were discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Suicide\",\"volume\":\"6 1 1\",\"pages\":\"36-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1976-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1943-278X.1976.TB00549.X\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Suicide\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1943-278X.1976.TB00549.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suicide","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1943-278X.1976.TB00549.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

自杀和模拟笔记以及强迫死亡的文件在哈佛第三心理社会学词典上进行了处理。对每个文本生成相关词的频率;这些数据相互比较,并与使用z分数的基线数据进行比较。结果表明,有自杀倾向的群体更“越轨”。其他研究结果还包括对自杀的具体关注和关注范围的缩小——这种模式表明,在自杀之前,人们会否认自杀。强迫死亡组似乎更有意义地接触生活,并意识到责任。受刺激的一组似乎是在制造一种流行的刻板印象,而不是表现出同理心。讨论了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Banality reinvestigated: A computer-based content analysis of suicidal and forced death documents.
Suicide and simulated notes and forced-death documents were processed on the Harvard III Psycho-Sociological Dictionary. For each text, frequencies of related words were generated; these were contrasted with each other and with baseline data using z scores. The results indicated that the suicidal groups were more "deviant." Other findings are concreteness and constriction of focus for suicides--a pattern suggesting denial just prior to the deed. The forced-death group seemed to be more meaningfully in contact with life and aware of responsibility. The stimulated group appeared to be fabricating a popular stereotype rather than exhibiting empathy. Implications were discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信