为什么福岛核灾难是人为灾难

IF 0.7 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
Harutoshi Funabashi
{"title":"为什么福岛核灾难是人为灾难","authors":"Harutoshi Funabashi","doi":"10.1111/J.1475-6781.2012.01161.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Fukushima nuclear disaster caused by the earthquake on 11 March 2011 is a man-made calamity because technological failures were derived from the failure of multiple social safeguards. The insufficient social safeguards can be explained by highlighting the “nuclear complex.” Institutional frameworks assured the enormous economic power of electric power companies and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI). Using this power, the electric power companies effectively manipulated information, maintained strong political power and constructed the nuclear complex, which has imposed an overwhelming influence on the central sphere of control at a national level and has put economic profit before safety. Regulations for safety have not been insufficient because the organization charged with nuclear safety belongs to the nuclear complex. Consequently, Regulatory Guides concerning reactors defined by the government have not accounted for catastrophic accidents. Philosopher Mori Arimasa's concept of \"binary combination\" provides us with an insight into a profound sociological reason for the Fukushima nuclear disaster because it highlights the immaturity of subjectivity and the root of irresponsibility in Japanese society. Binary combination is defined as a relationship between two persons that is characterized by intimacy and a vertical relation. Binary combination tends to produce a group or organization that is closed to outsiders and often shows indifference as well as insensitivity to outside opinions. In order overcome the defects of energy policy as well as the decision-making process, and to achieve a sustainable society, it is necessary to promote an energy paradigm shift and reforms for decision-making through the enrichment of the public sphere.","PeriodicalId":43424,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Japanese Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1475-6781.2012.01161.X","citationCount":"41","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster is a Man‐made Calamity\",\"authors\":\"Harutoshi Funabashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1475-6781.2012.01161.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Fukushima nuclear disaster caused by the earthquake on 11 March 2011 is a man-made calamity because technological failures were derived from the failure of multiple social safeguards. The insufficient social safeguards can be explained by highlighting the “nuclear complex.” Institutional frameworks assured the enormous economic power of electric power companies and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI). Using this power, the electric power companies effectively manipulated information, maintained strong political power and constructed the nuclear complex, which has imposed an overwhelming influence on the central sphere of control at a national level and has put economic profit before safety. Regulations for safety have not been insufficient because the organization charged with nuclear safety belongs to the nuclear complex. Consequently, Regulatory Guides concerning reactors defined by the government have not accounted for catastrophic accidents. Philosopher Mori Arimasa's concept of \\\"binary combination\\\" provides us with an insight into a profound sociological reason for the Fukushima nuclear disaster because it highlights the immaturity of subjectivity and the root of irresponsibility in Japanese society. Binary combination is defined as a relationship between two persons that is characterized by intimacy and a vertical relation. Binary combination tends to produce a group or organization that is closed to outsiders and often shows indifference as well as insensitivity to outside opinions. In order overcome the defects of energy policy as well as the decision-making process, and to achieve a sustainable society, it is necessary to promote an energy paradigm shift and reforms for decision-making through the enrichment of the public sphere.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Japanese Sociology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1475-6781.2012.01161.X\",\"citationCount\":\"41\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Japanese Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1475-6781.2012.01161.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Japanese Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1475-6781.2012.01161.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

摘要

2011年3月11日地震造成的福岛核灾难是人为灾难,因为技术故障源于多种社会保障措施的失败。社会保障的不足可以通过强调“核复合体”来解释。体制框架保证了电力公司和经济、贸易和工业部(METI)的巨大经济权力。利用这种权力,电力公司有效地操纵了信息,保持了强大的政治权力,并建造了核设施,这对国家一级的中央控制范围施加了压倒性的影响,并将经济利益置于安全之上。因为负责核安全的机构属于核设施,所以安全规定并不不足。因此,政府制定的有关反应堆的监管指南没有考虑到灾难性事故。哲学家森有正(Mori Arimasa)的“二元组合”概念凸显了日本社会主体性的不成熟和不负责任的根源,为我们提供了深刻的福岛核灾难的社会学原因。二元组合被定义为两个人之间的关系,其特征是亲密关系和垂直关系。二元组合倾向于产生一个对外界封闭的团体或组织,通常对外界的意见表现出冷漠和不敏感。为了克服能源政策和决策过程的缺陷,实现可持续社会,有必要通过丰富公共领域来推动能源范式的转变和决策的改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster is a Man‐made Calamity
The Fukushima nuclear disaster caused by the earthquake on 11 March 2011 is a man-made calamity because technological failures were derived from the failure of multiple social safeguards. The insufficient social safeguards can be explained by highlighting the “nuclear complex.” Institutional frameworks assured the enormous economic power of electric power companies and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI). Using this power, the electric power companies effectively manipulated information, maintained strong political power and constructed the nuclear complex, which has imposed an overwhelming influence on the central sphere of control at a national level and has put economic profit before safety. Regulations for safety have not been insufficient because the organization charged with nuclear safety belongs to the nuclear complex. Consequently, Regulatory Guides concerning reactors defined by the government have not accounted for catastrophic accidents. Philosopher Mori Arimasa's concept of "binary combination" provides us with an insight into a profound sociological reason for the Fukushima nuclear disaster because it highlights the immaturity of subjectivity and the root of irresponsibility in Japanese society. Binary combination is defined as a relationship between two persons that is characterized by intimacy and a vertical relation. Binary combination tends to produce a group or organization that is closed to outsiders and often shows indifference as well as insensitivity to outside opinions. In order overcome the defects of energy policy as well as the decision-making process, and to achieve a sustainable society, it is necessary to promote an energy paradigm shift and reforms for decision-making through the enrichment of the public sphere.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信