阶梯与灌木:案件数量问题与法庭活动研究

S. Daniels
{"title":"阶梯与灌木:案件数量问题与法庭活动研究","authors":"S. Daniels","doi":"10.1111/J.1747-4469.1984.TB01059.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The “litigation explosion” has been a frequent topic of concern in both academic circles and the popular press. This idea draws its polemical power from the assumption that litigation rates were lower in the past. But we presently know little about long-term trends in court activity. This article is a critical review of the existing literature on long-term litigation trends and the social development model which scholars have posited to explain changes in litigation patterns. Whether courts are indeed facing imminent crisis because of an explosion is still very much an open question; the extant literature offers no proof of an explosion. The available data do suggest, however, that previous studies may have been overly optimistic in expecting litigation trends to follow any single pattern. The questions about litigation rates will remain open until we are able to gain a fuller understanding of the trends in court activity over time.","PeriodicalId":80417,"journal":{"name":"American Bar Foundation research journal. American Bar Foundation","volume":"9 1","pages":"751-795"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1747-4469.1984.TB01059.X","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ladders and Bushes: The Problem of Caseloads and Studying Court Activities over Time\",\"authors\":\"S. Daniels\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1747-4469.1984.TB01059.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The “litigation explosion” has been a frequent topic of concern in both academic circles and the popular press. This idea draws its polemical power from the assumption that litigation rates were lower in the past. But we presently know little about long-term trends in court activity. This article is a critical review of the existing literature on long-term litigation trends and the social development model which scholars have posited to explain changes in litigation patterns. Whether courts are indeed facing imminent crisis because of an explosion is still very much an open question; the extant literature offers no proof of an explosion. The available data do suggest, however, that previous studies may have been overly optimistic in expecting litigation trends to follow any single pattern. The questions about litigation rates will remain open until we are able to gain a fuller understanding of the trends in court activity over time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Bar Foundation research journal. American Bar Foundation\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"751-795\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1747-4469.1984.TB01059.X\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Bar Foundation research journal. American Bar Foundation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1747-4469.1984.TB01059.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Bar Foundation research journal. American Bar Foundation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1747-4469.1984.TB01059.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

“诉讼爆炸”一直是学术界和大众媒体关注的一个频繁话题。这一观点从过去诉讼率较低的假设中获得了争论的力量。但我们目前对法院活动的长期趋势知之甚少。本文对长期诉讼趋势和学者们提出的解释诉讼模式变化的社会发展模式的现有文献进行了批判性的回顾。法院是否真的因为爆炸而面临迫在眉睫的危机仍然是一个悬而未决的问题;现存文献没有提供爆炸的证据。然而,现有的数据确实表明,以前的研究可能过于乐观地认为诉讼趋势会遵循任何单一模式。在我们能够更全面地了解法院活动的长期趋势之前,有关诉讼率的问题将一直悬而未决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ladders and Bushes: The Problem of Caseloads and Studying Court Activities over Time
The “litigation explosion” has been a frequent topic of concern in both academic circles and the popular press. This idea draws its polemical power from the assumption that litigation rates were lower in the past. But we presently know little about long-term trends in court activity. This article is a critical review of the existing literature on long-term litigation trends and the social development model which scholars have posited to explain changes in litigation patterns. Whether courts are indeed facing imminent crisis because of an explosion is still very much an open question; the extant literature offers no proof of an explosion. The available data do suggest, however, that previous studies may have been overly optimistic in expecting litigation trends to follow any single pattern. The questions about litigation rates will remain open until we are able to gain a fuller understanding of the trends in court activity over time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信