体外受精中胚胎移植的预期数量:有什么影响?

L. Cui, Yizhou Liu, Yueru Meng, Bing-qian Zhang, R. Tang, Zi-jiang Chen
{"title":"体外受精中胚胎移植的预期数量:有什么影响?","authors":"L. Cui, Yizhou Liu, Yueru Meng, Bing-qian Zhang, R. Tang, Zi-jiang Chen","doi":"10.1097/GRH.0000000000000007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Increased multiple pregnancy rate and resultant complications are some of the greatest concerns for in vitro fertilization (IVF) due to the practice of multiple embryo transfer. Although in some countries elective single embryo transfer has already been mandatory, in majority of other countries, clinical counsel still plays very important role to affect expected number of embryos transferred (ENET). Here we aim to explore the impact factors for ENET of IVF patients in order to provide scientific suggestions for clinical counsel before ET. Methods: We performed a survey of impact factors on ENET using a self-designed questionnaire in a total of 1154 IVF couples. Questions about policy change, medical concerns, and social-cultural information were included. Results: When the policy for restriction of family size was lifted, the percentages for double embryos transferred (77.8% vs. 63.7%) and multiple embryos transferred (8.0% vs. 3.9%) decreased significantly, while more tended to choose single embryo transfer (SET) (14.2% vs. 32.4%, P<0.01). Patients of more advanced age weremore likely to choose SET (12.9% for 18–24 y, 11.8% for 25–29 y, 12.0% for 30–34 y, 22.4% for 35–39 y, and 28.6% for over 40 y, P=0.01). More subjects with previous labor preferred SET than those without (23.3% vs. 12.4%, P<0.01). In addition, the proportion of SET choice was significantly decreased with infertility duration prolonged (1 vs. 2 y vs. 3 vs. ≥ 4 y: 24.2% vs. 14.9% vs. 11.1% vs. 11.2%, P< 0.01). On the basis of further investigation for reasons of ENET, specific formula including individual weighted policy, medical, and social-cultural factors was derived. Conclusions: Collectively, ENET for IVF patients is a complex, multi-factorial decision. The heterogeneity between patients due to differential policy restriction, medical concerns, and social-cultural background should be fully considered in clinical counsel about ENET.","PeriodicalId":92638,"journal":{"name":"Global reproductive health","volume":"67 1","pages":"e7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/GRH.0000000000000007","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expected numbers of embryos to transfer in in vitro fertilization: what affects?\",\"authors\":\"L. Cui, Yizhou Liu, Yueru Meng, Bing-qian Zhang, R. Tang, Zi-jiang Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GRH.0000000000000007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Increased multiple pregnancy rate and resultant complications are some of the greatest concerns for in vitro fertilization (IVF) due to the practice of multiple embryo transfer. Although in some countries elective single embryo transfer has already been mandatory, in majority of other countries, clinical counsel still plays very important role to affect expected number of embryos transferred (ENET). Here we aim to explore the impact factors for ENET of IVF patients in order to provide scientific suggestions for clinical counsel before ET. Methods: We performed a survey of impact factors on ENET using a self-designed questionnaire in a total of 1154 IVF couples. Questions about policy change, medical concerns, and social-cultural information were included. Results: When the policy for restriction of family size was lifted, the percentages for double embryos transferred (77.8% vs. 63.7%) and multiple embryos transferred (8.0% vs. 3.9%) decreased significantly, while more tended to choose single embryo transfer (SET) (14.2% vs. 32.4%, P<0.01). Patients of more advanced age weremore likely to choose SET (12.9% for 18–24 y, 11.8% for 25–29 y, 12.0% for 30–34 y, 22.4% for 35–39 y, and 28.6% for over 40 y, P=0.01). More subjects with previous labor preferred SET than those without (23.3% vs. 12.4%, P<0.01). In addition, the proportion of SET choice was significantly decreased with infertility duration prolonged (1 vs. 2 y vs. 3 vs. ≥ 4 y: 24.2% vs. 14.9% vs. 11.1% vs. 11.2%, P< 0.01). On the basis of further investigation for reasons of ENET, specific formula including individual weighted policy, medical, and social-cultural factors was derived. Conclusions: Collectively, ENET for IVF patients is a complex, multi-factorial decision. The heterogeneity between patients due to differential policy restriction, medical concerns, and social-cultural background should be fully considered in clinical counsel about ENET.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global reproductive health\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"e7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/GRH.0000000000000007\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global reproductive health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GRH.0000000000000007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GRH.0000000000000007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导论:多胎妊娠率的增加和由此产生的并发症是体外受精(IVF)中由于多胎移植的一些最大的担忧。尽管在一些国家选择性单胚胎移植已经是强制性的,但在其他大多数国家,临床咨询仍然在影响胚胎移植的预期数量(ENET)方面发挥着非常重要的作用。本研究旨在探讨体外受精患者ENET的影响因素,为体外受精前的临床咨询提供科学的建议。方法:采用自行设计的问卷对1154对体外受精夫妇进行ENET影响因素调查。包括有关政策变化、医疗问题和社会文化信息的问题。结果:家庭规模限制政策解除后,双胚胎移植比例(77.8% vs. 63.7%)和多胚胎移植比例(8.0% vs. 3.9%)显著降低,单胚胎移植比例(14.2% vs. 32.4%, P<0.01)增加。高龄患者更有可能选择SET(18-24岁12.9%,25-29岁11.8%,30-34岁12.0%,35-39岁22.4%,40岁以上28.6%,P=0.01)。有劳动史者比无劳动史者更倾向于SET(23.3%比12.4%,P<0.01)。此外,随着不孕持续时间的延长,选择SET的比例显著降低(1 y对2 y、3 y对≥4 y: 24.2%对14.9%、11.1%对11.2%,P< 0.01)。在进一步调查ENET原因的基础上,导出了包含个人加权政策、医疗和社会文化因素的具体公式。结论:总的来说,IVF患者的ENET是一个复杂的、多因素的决定。在临床咨询ENET时应充分考虑不同政策限制、医疗问题和社会文化背景导致的患者之间的异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expected numbers of embryos to transfer in in vitro fertilization: what affects?
Introduction: Increased multiple pregnancy rate and resultant complications are some of the greatest concerns for in vitro fertilization (IVF) due to the practice of multiple embryo transfer. Although in some countries elective single embryo transfer has already been mandatory, in majority of other countries, clinical counsel still plays very important role to affect expected number of embryos transferred (ENET). Here we aim to explore the impact factors for ENET of IVF patients in order to provide scientific suggestions for clinical counsel before ET. Methods: We performed a survey of impact factors on ENET using a self-designed questionnaire in a total of 1154 IVF couples. Questions about policy change, medical concerns, and social-cultural information were included. Results: When the policy for restriction of family size was lifted, the percentages for double embryos transferred (77.8% vs. 63.7%) and multiple embryos transferred (8.0% vs. 3.9%) decreased significantly, while more tended to choose single embryo transfer (SET) (14.2% vs. 32.4%, P<0.01). Patients of more advanced age weremore likely to choose SET (12.9% for 18–24 y, 11.8% for 25–29 y, 12.0% for 30–34 y, 22.4% for 35–39 y, and 28.6% for over 40 y, P=0.01). More subjects with previous labor preferred SET than those without (23.3% vs. 12.4%, P<0.01). In addition, the proportion of SET choice was significantly decreased with infertility duration prolonged (1 vs. 2 y vs. 3 vs. ≥ 4 y: 24.2% vs. 14.9% vs. 11.1% vs. 11.2%, P< 0.01). On the basis of further investigation for reasons of ENET, specific formula including individual weighted policy, medical, and social-cultural factors was derived. Conclusions: Collectively, ENET for IVF patients is a complex, multi-factorial decision. The heterogeneity between patients due to differential policy restriction, medical concerns, and social-cultural background should be fully considered in clinical counsel about ENET.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信