Transparent machine learning suggests a key driver in the decision to start insulin therapy in individuals with type 2 diabetes 透明机器学习预测决定2型糖尿病患者开始胰岛素治疗的关键驱动因素
Nicoletta Musacchio, Rita Zilich, Paola Ponzani, Giacomo Guaita, Carlo Giorda, Rebeca Heidbreder, Pierluigi Santin, Graziano Di Cianni
{"title":"Transparent machine learning suggests a key driver in the decision to start insulin therapy in individuals with type 2 diabetes 透明机器学习预测决定2型糖尿病患者开始胰岛素治疗的关键驱动因素","authors":"Nicoletta Musacchio, Rita Zilich, Paola Ponzani, Giacomo Guaita, Carlo Giorda, Rebeca Heidbreder, Pierluigi Santin, Graziano Di Cianni","doi":"10.1111/1753-0407.13361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>The objective of this study is to establish a predictive model using transparent machine learning (ML) to identify any drivers that characterize therapeutic inertia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data in the form of both descriptive and dynamic variables collected from electronic records of 1.5 million patients seen at clinics within the Italian Association of Medical Diabetologists between 2005–2019 were analyzed using logic learning machine (LLM), a “clear box” ML technique. Data were subjected to a first stage of modeling to allow ML to automatically select the most relevant factors related to inertia, and then four further modeling steps individuated key variables that discriminated the presence or absence of inertia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The LLM model revealed a key role for average glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) threshold values correlated with the presence or absence of insulin therapeutic inertia with an accuracy of 0.79. The model indicated that a patient's dynamic rather than static glycemic profile has a greater effect on therapeutic inertia. Specifically, the difference in HbA1c between two consecutive visits, what we call the HbA1c gap, plays a crucial role. Namely, insulin therapeutic inertia is correlated with an HbA1c gap of <6.6 mmol/mol (0.6%), but not with an HbA1c gap of >11 mmol/mol (1.0%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The results reveal, for the first time, the interrelationship between a patient's glycemic trend defined by sequential HbA1c measurements and timely or delayed initiation of insulin therapy. The results further demonstrate that LLM can provide insight in support of evidence-based medicine using real world data.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes","volume":"15 3","pages":"224-236"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1753-0407.13361","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transparent machine learning suggests a key driver in the decision to start insulin therapy in individuals with type 2 diabetes\\n 透明机器学习预测决定2型糖尿病患者开始胰岛素治疗的关键驱动因素\",\"authors\":\"Nicoletta Musacchio, Rita Zilich, Paola Ponzani, Giacomo Guaita, Carlo Giorda, Rebeca Heidbreder, Pierluigi Santin, Graziano Di Cianni\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1753-0407.13361\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>The objective of this study is to establish a predictive model using transparent machine learning (ML) to identify any drivers that characterize therapeutic inertia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data in the form of both descriptive and dynamic variables collected from electronic records of 1.5 million patients seen at clinics within the Italian Association of Medical Diabetologists between 2005–2019 were analyzed using logic learning machine (LLM), a “clear box” ML technique. Data were subjected to a first stage of modeling to allow ML to automatically select the most relevant factors related to inertia, and then four further modeling steps individuated key variables that discriminated the presence or absence of inertia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The LLM model revealed a key role for average glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) threshold values correlated with the presence or absence of insulin therapeutic inertia with an accuracy of 0.79. The model indicated that a patient's dynamic rather than static glycemic profile has a greater effect on therapeutic inertia. Specifically, the difference in HbA1c between two consecutive visits, what we call the HbA1c gap, plays a crucial role. Namely, insulin therapeutic inertia is correlated with an HbA1c gap of <6.6 mmol/mol (0.6%), but not with an HbA1c gap of >11 mmol/mol (1.0%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The results reveal, for the first time, the interrelationship between a patient's glycemic trend defined by sequential HbA1c measurements and timely or delayed initiation of insulin therapy. The results further demonstrate that LLM can provide insight in support of evidence-based medicine using real world data.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Diabetes\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"224-236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1753-0407.13361\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1753-0407.13361\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1753-0407.13361","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本研究的目的是建立一个使用透明机器学习(ML)的预测模型,以识别表征治疗惯性的任何驱动因素。方法使用逻辑学习机(LLM)(一种“清盒”ML技术)分析从意大利医学糖尿病学家协会(Italian Association of Medical diabetes ologists)门诊2005-2019年间150万患者的电子记录中收集的描述性和动态变量数据。数据经过第一阶段的建模,以允许ML自动选择与惯性相关的最相关因素,然后再进行四个进一步的建模步骤,对区分是否存在惯性的关键变量进行个性化。结果LLM模型揭示了平均糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)阈值与胰岛素治疗惯性存在与否相关的关键作用,准确率为0.79。该模型表明,患者的动态血糖谱比静态血糖谱对治疗惯性的影响更大。具体来说,连续两次就诊之间的HbA1c差异,即我们所说的HbA1c差距,起着至关重要的作用。也就是说,胰岛素治疗惯性与HbA1c差距6.6 mmol/mol(0.6%)相关,而与HbA1c差距11 mmol/mol(1.0%)无关。结论:该研究结果首次揭示了连续HbA1c测量所定义的患者血糖趋势与及时或延迟胰岛素治疗之间的相互关系。结果进一步表明,LLM可以为使用真实世界数据的循证医学提供支持。
Transparent machine learning suggests a key driver in the decision to start insulin therapy in individuals with type 2 diabetes
透明机器学习预测决定2型糖尿病患者开始胰岛素治疗的关键驱动因素
Aims
The objective of this study is to establish a predictive model using transparent machine learning (ML) to identify any drivers that characterize therapeutic inertia.
Methods
Data in the form of both descriptive and dynamic variables collected from electronic records of 1.5 million patients seen at clinics within the Italian Association of Medical Diabetologists between 2005–2019 were analyzed using logic learning machine (LLM), a “clear box” ML technique. Data were subjected to a first stage of modeling to allow ML to automatically select the most relevant factors related to inertia, and then four further modeling steps individuated key variables that discriminated the presence or absence of inertia.
Results
The LLM model revealed a key role for average glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) threshold values correlated with the presence or absence of insulin therapeutic inertia with an accuracy of 0.79. The model indicated that a patient's dynamic rather than static glycemic profile has a greater effect on therapeutic inertia. Specifically, the difference in HbA1c between two consecutive visits, what we call the HbA1c gap, plays a crucial role. Namely, insulin therapeutic inertia is correlated with an HbA1c gap of <6.6 mmol/mol (0.6%), but not with an HbA1c gap of >11 mmol/mol (1.0%).
Conclusions
The results reveal, for the first time, the interrelationship between a patient's glycemic trend defined by sequential HbA1c measurements and timely or delayed initiation of insulin therapy. The results further demonstrate that LLM can provide insight in support of evidence-based medicine using real world data.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Diabetes (JDB) devotes itself to diabetes research, therapeutics, and education. It aims to involve researchers and practitioners in a dialogue between East and West via all aspects of epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, management, complications and prevention of diabetes, including the molecular, biochemical, and physiological aspects of diabetes. The Editorial team is international with a unique mix of Asian and Western participation.
The Editors welcome submissions in form of original research articles, images, novel case reports and correspondence, and will solicit reviews, point-counterpoint, commentaries, editorials, news highlights, and educational content.