麻醉术:麻醉的实践

M. Harmel
{"title":"麻醉术:麻醉的实践","authors":"M. Harmel","doi":"10.1097/00000542-197311000-00039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well-established that nurse anesthetists practice nursing. Anesthesia administration has been a proper nursing function both in practice and in law for more than 100 years. Courts have long recognized the administration of anesthesia by nurses as a proper nursing function. In Frank v South, 194 S.W. 375 (Ky. 1917), the court ruled that a nurse giving anesthesia was not engaged in the practice of medicine within the meaning of the statute forbidding the unauthorized practice of medicine. Although Frank v South is many years old, its finding that nurse anesthetists do not practice medicine is still relevant because it has never been overturned or contradicted by another court. In Montana Society of Anesthesiologists v. Montana Board of Nursing, 339 Mont. 472, 171 P.3d 704 (2007), the Supreme Court of Montana reaffirmed this legal principle, recognizing that anesthesia is a specialty within the field of nursing and that nurse anesthetists practice nursing. 1","PeriodicalId":75734,"journal":{"name":"Concours medical","volume":"83 1","pages":"2773-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1973-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00000542-197311000-00039","citationCount":"75","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The practice of anesthesia].\",\"authors\":\"M. Harmel\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/00000542-197311000-00039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is well-established that nurse anesthetists practice nursing. Anesthesia administration has been a proper nursing function both in practice and in law for more than 100 years. Courts have long recognized the administration of anesthesia by nurses as a proper nursing function. In Frank v South, 194 S.W. 375 (Ky. 1917), the court ruled that a nurse giving anesthesia was not engaged in the practice of medicine within the meaning of the statute forbidding the unauthorized practice of medicine. Although Frank v South is many years old, its finding that nurse anesthetists do not practice medicine is still relevant because it has never been overturned or contradicted by another court. In Montana Society of Anesthesiologists v. Montana Board of Nursing, 339 Mont. 472, 171 P.3d 704 (2007), the Supreme Court of Montana reaffirmed this legal principle, recognizing that anesthesia is a specialty within the field of nursing and that nurse anesthetists practice nursing. 1\",\"PeriodicalId\":75734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Concours medical\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"2773-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1973-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00000542-197311000-00039\",\"citationCount\":\"75\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Concours medical\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-197311000-00039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concours medical","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-197311000-00039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 75

摘要

护士麻醉师从事护理工作是公认的。麻醉给药作为一种适当的护理功能,在实践和法律上已有100多年的历史。法院早就认识到护士麻醉管理是一种适当的护理职能。在弗兰克诉南案(Frank v South, 194 S.W. 375 (Ky. 1917))中,法院裁定,在禁止未经授权的医学实践的法规的意义上,给予麻醉的护士不从事医学实践。尽管弗兰克诉南案已有多年历史,但其关于护士麻醉师不行医的裁决仍然具有现实意义,因为这一裁决从未被其他法院推翻或推翻。在蒙大拿州麻醉医师协会诉蒙大拿州护理委员会案(339 Mont. 472, 171 P.3d 704(2007))中,蒙大拿州最高法院重申了这一法律原则,承认麻醉是护理领域的一门专业,护士麻醉师从事护理工作。1
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[The practice of anesthesia].
It is well-established that nurse anesthetists practice nursing. Anesthesia administration has been a proper nursing function both in practice and in law for more than 100 years. Courts have long recognized the administration of anesthesia by nurses as a proper nursing function. In Frank v South, 194 S.W. 375 (Ky. 1917), the court ruled that a nurse giving anesthesia was not engaged in the practice of medicine within the meaning of the statute forbidding the unauthorized practice of medicine. Although Frank v South is many years old, its finding that nurse anesthetists do not practice medicine is still relevant because it has never been overturned or contradicted by another court. In Montana Society of Anesthesiologists v. Montana Board of Nursing, 339 Mont. 472, 171 P.3d 704 (2007), the Supreme Court of Montana reaffirmed this legal principle, recognizing that anesthesia is a specialty within the field of nursing and that nurse anesthetists practice nursing. 1
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信