测量父母执行功能的生态效度

IF 5.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Catherine M. Diercks, Kelley E. Gunther, Douglas M. Teti, Erika Lunkenheimer
{"title":"测量父母执行功能的生态效度","authors":"Catherine M. Diercks,&nbsp;Kelley E. Gunther,&nbsp;Douglas M. Teti,&nbsp;Erika Lunkenheimer","doi":"10.1111/cdep.12464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Parents' executive functions (EFs), or cognitive skills facilitating thought and behavior management, are meaningful correlates of parenting behavior. EFs are theorized to support parents in inhibiting reactive responses, managing information during parent–child interactions, and adapting to novel developmental demands. Less effective EFs associate with risk for harsh parenting and physical abuse, underscoring the importance of research on parental EFs in promoting healthy child development. Yet, despite the strong theory, findings are mixed and reveal only modest effect sizes in relations between EFs and parenting. One explanation may be a lack of ecological validity in measuring parental EFs. Traditional measures of adult EFs have been used, but these are decontextualized and do not reflect the cognitively and emotionally demanding nature of parenting. In this article, we argue that new and adapted measures are needed. We discuss the role of EFs in parenting, review measurement, and offer suggestions for improvements in ecological validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":150,"journal":{"name":"Child Development Perspectives","volume":"16 4","pages":"208-214"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cdep.12464","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecological validity in measuring parents’ executive function\",\"authors\":\"Catherine M. Diercks,&nbsp;Kelley E. Gunther,&nbsp;Douglas M. Teti,&nbsp;Erika Lunkenheimer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cdep.12464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Parents' executive functions (EFs), or cognitive skills facilitating thought and behavior management, are meaningful correlates of parenting behavior. EFs are theorized to support parents in inhibiting reactive responses, managing information during parent–child interactions, and adapting to novel developmental demands. Less effective EFs associate with risk for harsh parenting and physical abuse, underscoring the importance of research on parental EFs in promoting healthy child development. Yet, despite the strong theory, findings are mixed and reveal only modest effect sizes in relations between EFs and parenting. One explanation may be a lack of ecological validity in measuring parental EFs. Traditional measures of adult EFs have been used, but these are decontextualized and do not reflect the cognitively and emotionally demanding nature of parenting. In this article, we argue that new and adapted measures are needed. We discuss the role of EFs in parenting, review measurement, and offer suggestions for improvements in ecological validity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Development Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"208-214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cdep.12464\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Development Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cdep.12464\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Development Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cdep.12464","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

父母的执行功能(EFs),或促进思想和行为管理的认知技能,是父母行为的有意义的相关。从理论上讲,EFs可以帮助父母抑制反应性反应,管理亲子互动中的信息,并适应新的发展需求。效果较差的电磁场与严厉的养育和身体虐待的风险有关,强调了研究父母电磁场在促进儿童健康发展方面的重要性。然而,尽管理论很有说服力,研究结果却参差不齐,而且只揭示了情感体验和父母教养之间关系的适度影响。一种解释可能是在测量亲代EFs时缺乏生态有效性。成人情感刺激的传统测量方法已经被使用,但这些方法都是脱离情境的,不能反映养育子女的认知和情感要求的本质。在本文中,我们认为需要新的和适应的措施。我们讨论了心理效度在养育子女中的作用,回顾了测量方法,并提出了改善生态效度的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ecological validity in measuring parents’ executive function

Parents' executive functions (EFs), or cognitive skills facilitating thought and behavior management, are meaningful correlates of parenting behavior. EFs are theorized to support parents in inhibiting reactive responses, managing information during parent–child interactions, and adapting to novel developmental demands. Less effective EFs associate with risk for harsh parenting and physical abuse, underscoring the importance of research on parental EFs in promoting healthy child development. Yet, despite the strong theory, findings are mixed and reveal only modest effect sizes in relations between EFs and parenting. One explanation may be a lack of ecological validity in measuring parental EFs. Traditional measures of adult EFs have been used, but these are decontextualized and do not reflect the cognitively and emotionally demanding nature of parenting. In this article, we argue that new and adapted measures are needed. We discuss the role of EFs in parenting, review measurement, and offer suggestions for improvements in ecological validity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Child Development Perspectives
Child Development Perspectives PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
1.60%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Child Development Perspectives" mission is to provide accessible, synthetic reports that summarize emerging trends or conclusions within various domains of developmental research, and to encourage multidisciplinary and international dialogue on a variety of topics in the developmental sciences. Articles in the journal will include reviews, commentary, and groups of papers on a targeted issue. Manuscripts presenting new empirical data are not appropriate for this journal. Articles will be obtained through two sources: author-initiated submissions and invited articles or commentary. Potential contributors who have ideas about a set of three or four papers written from very different perspectives may contact the editor with their ideas for feedback.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信