信息制度设计:比较积累策略

IF 3.9 3区 管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
A. Vining, D. Weimer
{"title":"信息制度设计:比较积累策略","authors":"A. Vining, D. Weimer","doi":"10.1080/13876989808412615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Institutional features that vary across countries affect the operation of policy instruments. Researchers often leave these features unstated. The absence of a clear description of relevant institutional features not only interferes with effective borrowing of (first-order) policy instruments across national contexts, but also hinders the cumulation of research that could inform institutional design (second-order policy instruments). The authors propose a framework based on five characteristics of property rights (completeness of allocation, cost of alienation, security from trespass, credibility of persistence, and autonomy) to be assessed at three levels (individual, interorganizational, and intraorganizational) for facilitating accumulation of comparative information.","PeriodicalId":47229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis","volume":"81 1","pages":"39-60"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"1998-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13876989808412615","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informing Institutional Design: Strategies for Comparative Cumulation\",\"authors\":\"A. Vining, D. Weimer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13876989808412615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Institutional features that vary across countries affect the operation of policy instruments. Researchers often leave these features unstated. The absence of a clear description of relevant institutional features not only interferes with effective borrowing of (first-order) policy instruments across national contexts, but also hinders the cumulation of research that could inform institutional design (second-order policy instruments). The authors propose a framework based on five characteristics of property rights (completeness of allocation, cost of alienation, security from trespass, credibility of persistence, and autonomy) to be assessed at three levels (individual, interorganizational, and intraorganizational) for facilitating accumulation of comparative information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"39-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13876989808412615\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13876989808412615\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13876989808412615","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

各国不同的制度特征影响着政策工具的运作。研究人员往往没有说明这些特征。缺乏对相关制度特征的明确描述,不仅妨碍了在各国背景下有效地借鉴(一级)政策工具,而且还阻碍了为制度设计(二级政策工具)提供信息的研究积累。作者提出了一个基于产权五个特征(配置完整性、转让成本、侵权安全性、持久性可信度和自主性)的框架,并在三个层面(个人、组织间和组织内)进行评估,以促进比较信息的积累。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Informing Institutional Design: Strategies for Comparative Cumulation
Institutional features that vary across countries affect the operation of policy instruments. Researchers often leave these features unstated. The absence of a clear description of relevant institutional features not only interferes with effective borrowing of (first-order) policy instruments across national contexts, but also hinders the cumulation of research that could inform institutional design (second-order policy instruments). The authors propose a framework based on five characteristics of property rights (completeness of allocation, cost of alienation, security from trespass, credibility of persistence, and autonomy) to be assessed at three levels (individual, interorganizational, and intraorganizational) for facilitating accumulation of comparative information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信