基于后悔理论的路径选择与交通均衡

C. Chorus
{"title":"基于后悔理论的路径选择与交通均衡","authors":"C. Chorus","doi":"10.1080/18128602.2010.498391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article studies route choices and traffic equilibria when travel times are risky, and travellers are risk averse and regret averse. It is shown how regret theory, being one of the most popular contenders of expected utility theory throughout the social sciences, can be applied to model risky route choices by means of an expected modified utility function. Subsequently this function is used to study numerically how risk aversion and regret aversion jointly determine equilibrium outcomes in a simple binary route choice situation. It is found that increasing levels of regret aversion lead to equilibrium shifts towards routes whose mean travel time is low, routes that are less risky and especially routes whose worst-case travel time is low compared to that of the competing route. Furthermore, risk aversion and regret aversion are found to reinforce each other's impact on equilibrium towards a situation where safer routes are preferred over riskier (but faster) ones.","PeriodicalId":49416,"journal":{"name":"Transportmetrica","volume":"8 1","pages":"291 - 305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/18128602.2010.498391","citationCount":"114","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regret theory-based route choices and traffic equilibria\",\"authors\":\"C. Chorus\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/18128602.2010.498391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article studies route choices and traffic equilibria when travel times are risky, and travellers are risk averse and regret averse. It is shown how regret theory, being one of the most popular contenders of expected utility theory throughout the social sciences, can be applied to model risky route choices by means of an expected modified utility function. Subsequently this function is used to study numerically how risk aversion and regret aversion jointly determine equilibrium outcomes in a simple binary route choice situation. It is found that increasing levels of regret aversion lead to equilibrium shifts towards routes whose mean travel time is low, routes that are less risky and especially routes whose worst-case travel time is low compared to that of the competing route. Furthermore, risk aversion and regret aversion are found to reinforce each other's impact on equilibrium towards a situation where safer routes are preferred over riskier (but faster) ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportmetrica\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"291 - 305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/18128602.2010.498391\",\"citationCount\":\"114\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportmetrica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/18128602.2010.498391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportmetrica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18128602.2010.498391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 114

摘要

本文研究了出行时间存在风险、出行者存在风险厌恶和后悔厌恶的情况下的路线选择和交通均衡问题。它显示了后悔理论,作为期望效用理论在整个社会科学中最受欢迎的竞争者之一,如何通过期望修正效用函数应用于风险路径选择模型。随后,利用该函数数值研究了简单二元路径选择情况下风险厌恶和后悔厌恶如何共同决定均衡结果。研究发现,增加后悔厌恶水平会导致均衡转向平均旅行时间较低的路线,风险较小的路线,特别是与竞争路线相比,最坏情况旅行时间较低的路线。此外,风险厌恶和后悔厌恶被发现会加强彼此对平衡的影响,使人们更倾向于选择更安全的路线,而不是更有风险(但更快)的路线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regret theory-based route choices and traffic equilibria
This article studies route choices and traffic equilibria when travel times are risky, and travellers are risk averse and regret averse. It is shown how regret theory, being one of the most popular contenders of expected utility theory throughout the social sciences, can be applied to model risky route choices by means of an expected modified utility function. Subsequently this function is used to study numerically how risk aversion and regret aversion jointly determine equilibrium outcomes in a simple binary route choice situation. It is found that increasing levels of regret aversion lead to equilibrium shifts towards routes whose mean travel time is low, routes that are less risky and especially routes whose worst-case travel time is low compared to that of the competing route. Furthermore, risk aversion and regret aversion are found to reinforce each other's impact on equilibrium towards a situation where safer routes are preferred over riskier (but faster) ones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportmetrica
Transportmetrica 工程技术-运输科技
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信