{"title":"评O ' donohue等人的《分析儿童性虐待指控》","authors":"Abpp H. D. Kirkpatrick","doi":"10.1080/15228932.2014.897541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article comments on the strengths and weaknesses of the O’Donohue et al. (2013) model, which proposes 10 dimensions from which to analyze child sexual abuse allegations. Suggested improvements to 5 of the 10 dimensions are offered. Additional bedrock literature references in the field of assessing child sexual abuse are also offered.","PeriodicalId":89973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","volume":"14 1","pages":"183 - 191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15228932.2014.897541","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Commentary on O’Donohue et al.’s “Analyzing Child Sexual Abuse Allegations”\",\"authors\":\"Abpp H. D. Kirkpatrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15228932.2014.897541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article comments on the strengths and weaknesses of the O’Donohue et al. (2013) model, which proposes 10 dimensions from which to analyze child sexual abuse allegations. Suggested improvements to 5 of the 10 dimensions are offered. Additional bedrock literature references in the field of assessing child sexual abuse are also offered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of forensic psychology practice\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"183 - 191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15228932.2014.897541\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of forensic psychology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2014.897541\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2014.897541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
本文对O 'Donohue et al.(2013)模型的优缺点进行了评论，该模型提出了10个维度来分析儿童性虐待指控。对10个维度中的5个提出了改进建议。还提供了评估儿童性虐待领域的其他基础文献参考。
A Commentary on O’Donohue et al.’s “Analyzing Child Sexual Abuse Allegations”
This article comments on the strengths and weaknesses of the O’Donohue et al. (2013) model, which proposes 10 dimensions from which to analyze child sexual abuse allegations. Suggested improvements to 5 of the 10 dimensions are offered. Additional bedrock literature references in the field of assessing child sexual abuse are also offered.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
