弗朗西斯科·库帕尼:他那个时代的“科学网络”和林奈“体系”的形成

S. Pulvirenti, Rosanna Maria Stefania Costa, P. Pavone
{"title":"弗朗西斯科·库帕尼:他那个时代的“科学网络”和林奈“体系”的形成","authors":"S. Pulvirenti, Rosanna Maria Stefania Costa, P. Pavone","doi":"10.1080/12538078.2015.1039580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Francesco Cupani, a seventeenth century Sicilian botanist, developed a network of scientific exchanges and connections with the most important scientists of his time. Despite living in considerable isolation, he managed, above all thanks to Sherard, to correspond and exchange with Ray, Commelin, Tournefort, Triumfetti, Volkamer and Böhm. He participated in the intellectual process and debate on the method of classifying plants that he undertook following the comparison and contrast between Linnaeus and Buffon, in formulating the Linnaeus method and in creating the concepts of genera and species. Cupani and other contemporary botanists were not able to establish a system of plant classification. Each of them was so engaged in researching the distinctive characters of individual plants, in avoiding duplications and synonyms, that they could not grasp what they had in common. Linnaeus, giving them notable recognition, placed them in the category of the “Curious”. These pre-Linnaean researchers contributed to the difficult process of overcoming the rigidity of late-Aristotelian classifications, thanks also to the invention of a “scientific network” that enabled the mutual debate and exchange of botanical material (publications, iconography, seeds and exsiccata).","PeriodicalId":7129,"journal":{"name":"Acta Botanica Gallica","volume":"162 1","pages":"215 - 223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/12538078.2015.1039580","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Francesco Cupani: the “scientific network” of his time and the making of the Linnaean “system”\",\"authors\":\"S. Pulvirenti, Rosanna Maria Stefania Costa, P. Pavone\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/12538078.2015.1039580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Francesco Cupani, a seventeenth century Sicilian botanist, developed a network of scientific exchanges and connections with the most important scientists of his time. Despite living in considerable isolation, he managed, above all thanks to Sherard, to correspond and exchange with Ray, Commelin, Tournefort, Triumfetti, Volkamer and Böhm. He participated in the intellectual process and debate on the method of classifying plants that he undertook following the comparison and contrast between Linnaeus and Buffon, in formulating the Linnaeus method and in creating the concepts of genera and species. Cupani and other contemporary botanists were not able to establish a system of plant classification. Each of them was so engaged in researching the distinctive characters of individual plants, in avoiding duplications and synonyms, that they could not grasp what they had in common. Linnaeus, giving them notable recognition, placed them in the category of the “Curious”. These pre-Linnaean researchers contributed to the difficult process of overcoming the rigidity of late-Aristotelian classifications, thanks also to the invention of a “scientific network” that enabled the mutual debate and exchange of botanical material (publications, iconography, seeds and exsiccata).\",\"PeriodicalId\":7129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Botanica Gallica\",\"volume\":\"162 1\",\"pages\":\"215 - 223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/12538078.2015.1039580\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Botanica Gallica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/12538078.2015.1039580\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Botanica Gallica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/12538078.2015.1039580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

弗朗西斯科·库帕尼是17世纪西西里的一位植物学家,他与当时最重要的科学家建立了科学交流和联系网络。尽管生活相当孤立,但他还是设法与雷、科默林、图尔纳福特、凯旋菲蒂、沃尔卡默和Böhm通信和交流,这一切都要归功于谢拉德。在比较和对比林奈和布丰之后,他参与了关于植物分类方法的智力过程和辩论,形成了林奈方法,创造了属和种的概念。库帕尼和其他当代植物学家未能建立一套植物分类系统。他们每个人都如此专注于研究单个植物的独特特征,避免重复和同义词,以至于他们无法掌握它们的共同之处。林奈对它们给予了显著的认可,并将它们归入“好奇”的范畴。这些前林奈时代的研究人员为克服亚里士多德晚期分类的僵化做出了贡献,这也要归功于“科学网络”的发明,该网络使植物材料(出版物、图像、种子和标本)的相互辩论和交换成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Francesco Cupani: the “scientific network” of his time and the making of the Linnaean “system”
Abstract Francesco Cupani, a seventeenth century Sicilian botanist, developed a network of scientific exchanges and connections with the most important scientists of his time. Despite living in considerable isolation, he managed, above all thanks to Sherard, to correspond and exchange with Ray, Commelin, Tournefort, Triumfetti, Volkamer and Böhm. He participated in the intellectual process and debate on the method of classifying plants that he undertook following the comparison and contrast between Linnaeus and Buffon, in formulating the Linnaeus method and in creating the concepts of genera and species. Cupani and other contemporary botanists were not able to establish a system of plant classification. Each of them was so engaged in researching the distinctive characters of individual plants, in avoiding duplications and synonyms, that they could not grasp what they had in common. Linnaeus, giving them notable recognition, placed them in the category of the “Curious”. These pre-Linnaean researchers contributed to the difficult process of overcoming the rigidity of late-Aristotelian classifications, thanks also to the invention of a “scientific network” that enabled the mutual debate and exchange of botanical material (publications, iconography, seeds and exsiccata).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信