国际背景下的学习评估:探索教师价值观和实践的共同和不同维度

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
P. Warwick, Stuart Shaw, Martin Johnson
{"title":"国际背景下的学习评估:探索教师价值观和实践的共同和不同维度","authors":"P. Warwick, Stuart Shaw, Martin Johnson","doi":"10.1080/09585176.2014.975732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Assessment for Learning in International Contexts (ALIC) project sought to extend knowledge around teachers’ understandings of Assessment for Learning (AfL). Using a modified version of a survey item devised by James and Pedder for use with teachers in England, evidence was gathered about the assessment practices that were highly valued by teachers across international contexts. The extent of congruence between these values and teachers’ reported classroom practices was explored and dimensions of teachers’ assessment practices were derived through factor analysis. While there was considerable congruence across the ALIC cohort of teachers and data sets derived from English teachers, particularly with respect to the items that have positive values–practice gaps, there were some interesting differences. Two components were derived from factor analysis, rather than the three derived by James and Pedder. These components were ‘Making learning explicit and promoting learner autonomy’ and ‘Student control of assessment processes’.","PeriodicalId":46745,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09585176.2014.975732","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment for Learning in International Contexts: exploring shared and divergent dimensions in teacher values and practices\",\"authors\":\"P. Warwick, Stuart Shaw, Martin Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09585176.2014.975732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Assessment for Learning in International Contexts (ALIC) project sought to extend knowledge around teachers’ understandings of Assessment for Learning (AfL). Using a modified version of a survey item devised by James and Pedder for use with teachers in England, evidence was gathered about the assessment practices that were highly valued by teachers across international contexts. The extent of congruence between these values and teachers’ reported classroom practices was explored and dimensions of teachers’ assessment practices were derived through factor analysis. While there was considerable congruence across the ALIC cohort of teachers and data sets derived from English teachers, particularly with respect to the items that have positive values–practice gaps, there were some interesting differences. Two components were derived from factor analysis, rather than the three derived by James and Pedder. These components were ‘Making learning explicit and promoting learner autonomy’ and ‘Student control of assessment processes’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curriculum Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09585176.2014.975732\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curriculum Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2014.975732\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2014.975732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

国际背景下的学习评估(ALIC)项目旨在扩展教师对学习评估(AfL)的理解。使用詹姆斯和佩德为英国教师设计的一项调查项目的修改版本,收集了关于国际背景下教师高度重视的评估实践的证据。这些价值观与教师报告的课堂实践之间的一致性程度进行了探索,并通过因子分析得出了教师评估实践的维度。虽然在ALIC的教师队列和来自英语教师的数据集之间存在相当大的一致性,特别是在具有正价值的项目-实践差距方面,但也存在一些有趣的差异。因子分析得出了两个成分,而不是James和Pedder得出的三个成分。这些组成部分是“明确学习,促进学习者自主”和“学生控制评估过程”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment for Learning in International Contexts: exploring shared and divergent dimensions in teacher values and practices
The Assessment for Learning in International Contexts (ALIC) project sought to extend knowledge around teachers’ understandings of Assessment for Learning (AfL). Using a modified version of a survey item devised by James and Pedder for use with teachers in England, evidence was gathered about the assessment practices that were highly valued by teachers across international contexts. The extent of congruence between these values and teachers’ reported classroom practices was explored and dimensions of teachers’ assessment practices were derived through factor analysis. While there was considerable congruence across the ALIC cohort of teachers and data sets derived from English teachers, particularly with respect to the items that have positive values–practice gaps, there were some interesting differences. Two components were derived from factor analysis, rather than the three derived by James and Pedder. These components were ‘Making learning explicit and promoting learner autonomy’ and ‘Student control of assessment processes’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Curriculum Journal
Curriculum Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信