助听器使用的客观评估

E. Mäki-Torkko, M. Sorri, E. Laukli
{"title":"助听器使用的客观评估","authors":"E. Mäki-Torkko, M. Sorri, E. Laukli","doi":"10.1080/010503901300007146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hearing aid use was assessed using both objective (time recorded in the memory of the hearing aid) and subjective methods (interview and patient diary) in a clinical series of consecutive adult female and male Finnish and Norwegian hearing aid candidates ( n = 84). The median study time was 34 days (minimum 21, maximum 73). Over a third of the subjects used their hearing aid for less than 4 hours a day according to an objective assessment. Both of the subjective methods tended to overestimate the use. This preliminary study shows that an objective assessment of hearing aid use is needed and the subjective methods must be validated.","PeriodicalId":76516,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian audiology","volume":"30 1","pages":"81 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/010503901300007146","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Objective assessment of hearing aid use\",\"authors\":\"E. Mäki-Torkko, M. Sorri, E. Laukli\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/010503901300007146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hearing aid use was assessed using both objective (time recorded in the memory of the hearing aid) and subjective methods (interview and patient diary) in a clinical series of consecutive adult female and male Finnish and Norwegian hearing aid candidates ( n = 84). The median study time was 34 days (minimum 21, maximum 73). Over a third of the subjects used their hearing aid for less than 4 hours a day according to an objective assessment. Both of the subjective methods tended to overestimate the use. This preliminary study shows that an objective assessment of hearing aid use is needed and the subjective methods must be validated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian audiology\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"81 - 82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/010503901300007146\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/010503901300007146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/010503901300007146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

通过客观(记录在助听器记忆中的时间)和主观方法(访谈和患者日记)对芬兰和挪威连续成年女性和男性助听器候选人(n = 84)的临床系列进行助听器使用评估。中位研究时间为34天(最短21天,最长73天)。根据客观评估,超过三分之一的受试者每天使用助听器的时间少于4小时。这两种主观方法都倾向于高估使用。本初步研究表明,需要对助听器使用情况进行客观评估,主观方法有待验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Objective assessment of hearing aid use
Hearing aid use was assessed using both objective (time recorded in the memory of the hearing aid) and subjective methods (interview and patient diary) in a clinical series of consecutive adult female and male Finnish and Norwegian hearing aid candidates ( n = 84). The median study time was 34 days (minimum 21, maximum 73). Over a third of the subjects used their hearing aid for less than 4 hours a day according to an objective assessment. Both of the subjective methods tended to overestimate the use. This preliminary study shows that an objective assessment of hearing aid use is needed and the subjective methods must be validated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信