{"title":"评价性研究综述的范式","authors":"R. Craig","doi":"10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary This article presents 12 easy steps for writers of research reviews. Rigid adherence to these steps promises to facilitate the acceptability of the article for publication, since editors have been unconsciously conditioned to a style of presentation. While the main advantage of this article is to minimize manuscript rejection, the essential disadvantage is that it may force some journals to go out of print.","PeriodicalId":78361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment","volume":"34 1","pages":"366-368"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1970-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380267","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Paradigm for Evaluative Research Reviews\",\"authors\":\"R. Craig\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary This article presents 12 easy steps for writers of research reviews. Rigid adherence to these steps promises to facilitate the acceptability of the article for publication, since editors have been unconsciously conditioned to a style of presentation. While the main advantage of this article is to minimize manuscript rejection, the essential disadvantage is that it may force some journals to go out of print.\",\"PeriodicalId\":78361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"366-368\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1970-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380267\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Summary This article presents 12 easy steps for writers of research reviews. Rigid adherence to these steps promises to facilitate the acceptability of the article for publication, since editors have been unconsciously conditioned to a style of presentation. While the main advantage of this article is to minimize manuscript rejection, the essential disadvantage is that it may force some journals to go out of print.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
