共享收藏:协作管理(ALCTS专著)

J. Timoney
{"title":"共享收藏:协作管理(ALCTS专著)","authors":"J. Timoney","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2016.1250612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"balkan Wars (1990s). Tabak argues that current thinking of particularism versus universalism encourages researchers to take a prior position before they start their study. Tabak argues that actor–network theory is more useful in these areas as an intersection. That is, a ‘group that is held together’ rather than ‘something that holds the group together’ (p. xii). instead of trying to reveal the hidden forces behind information practices and behaviour, Tabak argues it is better to look at the ways in which individuals and groups exchange processes through the constant circulation of information practices. both books give the reader a lot of conceptual ideas to think about. information science is often criticised as having no theoretical depth; it is regarded as being a mashup from various intellectual disciplines. These two books suggest alternative conceptual models and theories; that rather than being regarded as an isolated field information science is an interscience; it acts as an intermediary through actors and networks for other intellectual disciplines. These two books are more suited for an academic library, particularly for graduate level or academic staff.","PeriodicalId":82953,"journal":{"name":"The Australian library journal","volume":"65 1","pages":"339 - 340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00049670.2016.1250612","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shared collections: collaborative stewardship (An ALCTS monograph)\",\"authors\":\"J. Timoney\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00049670.2016.1250612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"balkan Wars (1990s). Tabak argues that current thinking of particularism versus universalism encourages researchers to take a prior position before they start their study. Tabak argues that actor–network theory is more useful in these areas as an intersection. That is, a ‘group that is held together’ rather than ‘something that holds the group together’ (p. xii). instead of trying to reveal the hidden forces behind information practices and behaviour, Tabak argues it is better to look at the ways in which individuals and groups exchange processes through the constant circulation of information practices. both books give the reader a lot of conceptual ideas to think about. information science is often criticised as having no theoretical depth; it is regarded as being a mashup from various intellectual disciplines. These two books suggest alternative conceptual models and theories; that rather than being regarded as an isolated field information science is an interscience; it acts as an intermediary through actors and networks for other intellectual disciplines. These two books are more suited for an academic library, particularly for graduate level or academic staff.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Australian library journal\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"339 - 340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00049670.2016.1250612\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Australian library journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.2016.1250612\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian library journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.2016.1250612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

巴尔干战争(1990年代)。塔巴克认为,当前对特殊主义与普遍主义的思考鼓励研究人员在开始研究之前采取先验立场。Tabak认为,行动者网络理论在这些领域作为一个交叉点更为有用。也就是说,一个“团结在一起的群体”而不是“将群体团结在一起的东西”(第12页)。Tabak认为,与其试图揭示信息实践和行为背后隐藏的力量,不如研究个人和群体通过不断循环的信息实践交换过程的方式。这两本书都给读者提供了很多概念性的思考。信息科学经常被批评为没有理论深度;它被认为是各种知识学科的混搭。这两本书提出了不同的概念模型和理论;信息科学不是一个孤立的领域,而是一门交叉学科;它通过其他知识学科的参与者和网络充当中介。这两本书更适合学术图书馆,特别是研究生水平或学术人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shared collections: collaborative stewardship (An ALCTS monograph)
balkan Wars (1990s). Tabak argues that current thinking of particularism versus universalism encourages researchers to take a prior position before they start their study. Tabak argues that actor–network theory is more useful in these areas as an intersection. That is, a ‘group that is held together’ rather than ‘something that holds the group together’ (p. xii). instead of trying to reveal the hidden forces behind information practices and behaviour, Tabak argues it is better to look at the ways in which individuals and groups exchange processes through the constant circulation of information practices. both books give the reader a lot of conceptual ideas to think about. information science is often criticised as having no theoretical depth; it is regarded as being a mashup from various intellectual disciplines. These two books suggest alternative conceptual models and theories; that rather than being regarded as an isolated field information science is an interscience; it acts as an intermediary through actors and networks for other intellectual disciplines. These two books are more suited for an academic library, particularly for graduate level or academic staff.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信