神经质风格与人格五因素模型

Brian Norensberg, P. Zachar
{"title":"神经质风格与人格五因素模型","authors":"Brian Norensberg, P. Zachar","doi":"10.1037/e741592011-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the relationship between David Shapiro's (1965) concept of neurotic styles (a categorical model) and the five-factor model of personality (a dimensional model). Although the neurotic styles are often thought of as being discrete categories, Shapiro's description of these categories can be interpreted as being organized along a dimension called mode of cognition, with diffuseness at one end and rigidity at the other. Shapiro's description of diffuseness and rigidity parallels certain facet scales that make up the Openness to Experience and Conscientiousness domain scales of the five-factor model. Therefore, a traditional categorical model and the modern dimensional model may be integratable. To test this possibility, three scales were used: the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R; Costa and McCrae, 1992), the Clinical Multiaxial- Inventory (MCMI-III; Millon's, 1997) and a new scale constructed for this study called the Cognitive Diffuseness Questionnaire (CDQ). The results provide mixed support for the current model in the context of the five-factor model. This study provides limited support for the existence of a single continuum with diffuseness on one end and rigidity on another. Instead, diffuseness and rigidity appear to best be described as two separate continua.","PeriodicalId":30144,"journal":{"name":"The New School Psychology Bulletin","volume":"3 1","pages":"79-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neurotic Styles and the Five Factor Model of Personality\",\"authors\":\"Brian Norensberg, P. Zachar\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/e741592011-004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates the relationship between David Shapiro's (1965) concept of neurotic styles (a categorical model) and the five-factor model of personality (a dimensional model). Although the neurotic styles are often thought of as being discrete categories, Shapiro's description of these categories can be interpreted as being organized along a dimension called mode of cognition, with diffuseness at one end and rigidity at the other. Shapiro's description of diffuseness and rigidity parallels certain facet scales that make up the Openness to Experience and Conscientiousness domain scales of the five-factor model. Therefore, a traditional categorical model and the modern dimensional model may be integratable. To test this possibility, three scales were used: the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R; Costa and McCrae, 1992), the Clinical Multiaxial- Inventory (MCMI-III; Millon's, 1997) and a new scale constructed for this study called the Cognitive Diffuseness Questionnaire (CDQ). The results provide mixed support for the current model in the context of the five-factor model. This study provides limited support for the existence of a single continuum with diffuseness on one end and rigidity on another. Instead, diffuseness and rigidity appear to best be described as two separate continua.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The New School Psychology Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"79-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The New School Psychology Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/e741592011-004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The New School Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e741592011-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨David Shapiro(1965)神经质风格概念(范畴模型)与人格五因素模型(维度模型)之间的关系。尽管神经症类型通常被认为是离散的类别,夏皮罗对这些类别的描述可以被解释为沿着一个被称为认知模式的维度组织起来,一端是扩散,另一端是僵化。夏皮罗对弥散性和刚性的描述与构成五因素模型的经验开放性和责任心领域量表的某些方面量表相似。因此,传统的范畴模型和现代的量纲模型是可以整合的。为了测试这种可能性,使用了三个量表:NEO人格量表(NEO- pi - r);Costa和mcrae, 1992),临床多轴量表(MCMI-III;Millon's, 1997)和为本研究构建的新量表认知扩散问卷(CDQ)。结果在五因素模型的背景下为当前模型提供了混合支持。本研究为一端为扩散而另一端为刚性的单一连续体的存在提供了有限的支持。相反,扩散性和刚性似乎最好被描述为两个独立的连续体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neurotic Styles and the Five Factor Model of Personality
This study investigates the relationship between David Shapiro's (1965) concept of neurotic styles (a categorical model) and the five-factor model of personality (a dimensional model). Although the neurotic styles are often thought of as being discrete categories, Shapiro's description of these categories can be interpreted as being organized along a dimension called mode of cognition, with diffuseness at one end and rigidity at the other. Shapiro's description of diffuseness and rigidity parallels certain facet scales that make up the Openness to Experience and Conscientiousness domain scales of the five-factor model. Therefore, a traditional categorical model and the modern dimensional model may be integratable. To test this possibility, three scales were used: the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R; Costa and McCrae, 1992), the Clinical Multiaxial- Inventory (MCMI-III; Millon's, 1997) and a new scale constructed for this study called the Cognitive Diffuseness Questionnaire (CDQ). The results provide mixed support for the current model in the context of the five-factor model. This study provides limited support for the existence of a single continuum with diffuseness on one end and rigidity on another. Instead, diffuseness and rigidity appear to best be described as two separate continua.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信