{"title":"HERCULEAN LABOURS:约翰内斯·马蒂尼摩德纳AND THE MANUSCRIPT)图书馆13 ESTENSE, smα。M . 1。","authors":"M. Steib","doi":"10.1017/S0261127913000132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modena, Biblioteca Estense, MS α.M.1.13 (ModD) is a collection of masses compiled in Ferrara around 1480 for the court of Ercole I d'Este. Although several scholars have argued that the changes in ModD were the result of composers reworking their own music or intervention by the scribe, the situation is far more complex. Through a careful examination of the textual and musical changes in ModD, this essay substantiates three hypotheses: that ModD had a separate and independent editor (Johannes Martini) apart from the scribe who copied it (Fra Filippo), and that both tampered with the music to a different extent; that the reasons behind the changes were in part politically and religiously motivated; and finally that several of the masses in ModD contain sections written by someone other than their original composer, a practice that may have been more common than we currently believe.","PeriodicalId":42589,"journal":{"name":"EARLY MUSIC HISTORY","volume":"33 1","pages":"183 - 257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0261127913000132","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HERCULEAN LABOURS: JOHANNES MARTINI AND THE MANUSCRIPT MODENA, BIBLIOTECA ESTENSE, MS α.M.1.13\",\"authors\":\"M. Steib\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0261127913000132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Modena, Biblioteca Estense, MS α.M.1.13 (ModD) is a collection of masses compiled in Ferrara around 1480 for the court of Ercole I d'Este. Although several scholars have argued that the changes in ModD were the result of composers reworking their own music or intervention by the scribe, the situation is far more complex. Through a careful examination of the textual and musical changes in ModD, this essay substantiates three hypotheses: that ModD had a separate and independent editor (Johannes Martini) apart from the scribe who copied it (Fra Filippo), and that both tampered with the music to a different extent; that the reasons behind the changes were in part politically and religiously motivated; and finally that several of the masses in ModD contain sections written by someone other than their original composer, a practice that may have been more common than we currently believe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EARLY MUSIC HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"183 - 257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0261127913000132\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EARLY MUSIC HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261127913000132\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EARLY MUSIC HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261127913000132","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Modena, Biblioteca Estense, MS α.M.1.13 (ModD)是1480年左右在费拉拉为埃尔科尔·伊德·埃斯特宫廷编写的弥撒集。尽管一些学者认为,ModD的变化是作曲家重新创作自己的音乐或抄写员干预的结果,但情况要复杂得多。通过对《ModD》文本和音乐变化的仔细研究,本文提出了三个假设:除了抄写它的抄写员(菲利波)之外,《ModD》还有一个独立的编辑(约翰内斯·马蒂尼),两人都在不同程度上篡改了音乐;这些变化背后的原因部分是出于政治和宗教动机;最后,ModD中的一些大众包含由其他人而不是其原始作曲家编写的部分,这种做法可能比我们目前认为的更常见。
HERCULEAN LABOURS: JOHANNES MARTINI AND THE MANUSCRIPT MODENA, BIBLIOTECA ESTENSE, MS α.M.1.13
Modena, Biblioteca Estense, MS α.M.1.13 (ModD) is a collection of masses compiled in Ferrara around 1480 for the court of Ercole I d'Este. Although several scholars have argued that the changes in ModD were the result of composers reworking their own music or intervention by the scribe, the situation is far more complex. Through a careful examination of the textual and musical changes in ModD, this essay substantiates three hypotheses: that ModD had a separate and independent editor (Johannes Martini) apart from the scribe who copied it (Fra Filippo), and that both tampered with the music to a different extent; that the reasons behind the changes were in part politically and religiously motivated; and finally that several of the masses in ModD contain sections written by someone other than their original composer, a practice that may have been more common than we currently believe.
期刊介绍:
Early Music History is devoted to the study of music from the early Middle Ages to the end of the seventeenth century. It gives preference to studies pursuing interdisciplinary approaches and to those developing new methodological ideas. The scope is broad and includes manuscript studies, textual criticism, iconography, studies of the relationship between words and music, and the relationship between music and society.