(A.S.)Chankowski是希腊化的。《爱琴海岛屿和小亚细亚希腊城市公民制度研究》(文化与城市,4),巴黎:de Boccard, 2010。第621页,插图。€85人。9782701803050.

R. Bremen
{"title":"(A.S.)Chankowski是希腊化的。《爱琴海岛屿和小亚细亚希腊城市公民制度研究》(文化与城市,4),巴黎:de Boccard, 2010。第621页,插图。€85人。9782701803050.","authors":"R. Bremen","doi":"10.1017/S0075426915000609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"K. Buraselis, the only contributor to deal with the Aegean islands, analyses three regions and their federal sanctuaries: the Cyclades with their league of islands (Nesiotai), Lesbos and Crete (which actually never had a federal sanctuary). The author argues that federalism could not advance very much on its own during Hellenistic times due to the geographical features of the Aegean region, which was simultaneously divided and united by the sea. The author rightly concludes that federal developments around central sanctuaries assumed mixed forms, marked by the independent initiatives of members, and remained dependent on the actions, major political goals and support of hegemonic powers (for example both kings and large cities). Finally, T.H. Nielsen argues that even if the sanctuaries of Triphylia and Arkadia could be identified, it would be difficult to determine if they ever functioned as federal sanctuaries as the federation existed for a very short time. The volume does not include an index, which would greatly facilitate its consultation. Nonetheless it deserves considerable praise, not only for examining the various multifaceted ways in which the federal sanctuary functioned and evolved, but also for challenging many traditional concepts hitherto used to comprehend this phenomenon. It will thus appeal to anyone with an interest in ancient religion and politics. ERICA ANGLIKER University of Zurich and Birkbeck, University of London erica.morais.angliker@access.uzh.ch","PeriodicalId":92301,"journal":{"name":"The Hospital and health review","volume":"135 1","pages":"234-235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0075426915000609","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"(A.S.) Chankowski L'éphébie hellénistique. Étude d'une institution civique dans les cités grecques des îles de la Mer Égée et de l'Asie Mineure (Culture et cité, 4). Paris: de Boccard, 2010. Pp. 621, illus. €85. 9782701803050.\",\"authors\":\"R. Bremen\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0075426915000609\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"K. Buraselis, the only contributor to deal with the Aegean islands, analyses three regions and their federal sanctuaries: the Cyclades with their league of islands (Nesiotai), Lesbos and Crete (which actually never had a federal sanctuary). The author argues that federalism could not advance very much on its own during Hellenistic times due to the geographical features of the Aegean region, which was simultaneously divided and united by the sea. The author rightly concludes that federal developments around central sanctuaries assumed mixed forms, marked by the independent initiatives of members, and remained dependent on the actions, major political goals and support of hegemonic powers (for example both kings and large cities). Finally, T.H. Nielsen argues that even if the sanctuaries of Triphylia and Arkadia could be identified, it would be difficult to determine if they ever functioned as federal sanctuaries as the federation existed for a very short time. The volume does not include an index, which would greatly facilitate its consultation. Nonetheless it deserves considerable praise, not only for examining the various multifaceted ways in which the federal sanctuary functioned and evolved, but also for challenging many traditional concepts hitherto used to comprehend this phenomenon. It will thus appeal to anyone with an interest in ancient religion and politics. ERICA ANGLIKER University of Zurich and Birkbeck, University of London erica.morais.angliker@access.uzh.ch\",\"PeriodicalId\":92301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Hospital and health review\",\"volume\":\"135 1\",\"pages\":\"234-235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0075426915000609\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Hospital and health review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0075426915000609\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Hospital and health review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0075426915000609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
(A.S.) Chankowski L'éphébie hellénistique. Étude d'une institution civique dans les cités grecques des îles de la Mer Égée et de l'Asie Mineure (Culture et cité, 4). Paris: de Boccard, 2010. Pp. 621, illus. €85. 9782701803050.
K. Buraselis, the only contributor to deal with the Aegean islands, analyses three regions and their federal sanctuaries: the Cyclades with their league of islands (Nesiotai), Lesbos and Crete (which actually never had a federal sanctuary). The author argues that federalism could not advance very much on its own during Hellenistic times due to the geographical features of the Aegean region, which was simultaneously divided and united by the sea. The author rightly concludes that federal developments around central sanctuaries assumed mixed forms, marked by the independent initiatives of members, and remained dependent on the actions, major political goals and support of hegemonic powers (for example both kings and large cities). Finally, T.H. Nielsen argues that even if the sanctuaries of Triphylia and Arkadia could be identified, it would be difficult to determine if they ever functioned as federal sanctuaries as the federation existed for a very short time. The volume does not include an index, which would greatly facilitate its consultation. Nonetheless it deserves considerable praise, not only for examining the various multifaceted ways in which the federal sanctuary functioned and evolved, but also for challenging many traditional concepts hitherto used to comprehend this phenomenon. It will thus appeal to anyone with an interest in ancient religion and politics. ERICA ANGLIKER University of Zurich and Birkbeck, University of London erica.morais.angliker@access.uzh.ch
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信