特定激励问题的激励调节策略的适宜性

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
N. Eckerlein, Tobias Engelschalk, G. Steuer, M. Dresel
{"title":"特定激励问题的激励调节策略的适宜性","authors":"N. Eckerlein, Tobias Engelschalk, G. Steuer, M. Dresel","doi":"10.1026/0049-8637/a000257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Learners utilize a variety of strategies to regulate their motivation. Theoretical models of motivational regulation imply a connection between the decision for a concrete strategy and the specific situational requirements. Accordingly, one would expect that the suitability of a strategy depends on how well it fits the motivational problem in question. Since reliable findings on this point are missing, we conducted a survey of N = 33 proven experts in the field of self-regulated learning to enlighten the suitability of nine strategies for six different motivational problems. Our findings showed that the suitability of a group of strategies was consistently considered dependent on the given motivational problem (e. g., ability-focus self-talk was suitable to enhance motivation for a difficult task) – pointing to the importance of conditional strategy knowledge for learners. For another group of strategies, experts’ suitability judgments were indifferent, indicating that strategy suitability may also comprise idiosyncratic (i. e., person-specific) aspects.","PeriodicalId":45028,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Entwicklungspsychologie Und Padagogische Psychologie","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suitability of Motivational Regulation Strategies for Specific Motivational Problems\",\"authors\":\"N. Eckerlein, Tobias Engelschalk, G. Steuer, M. Dresel\",\"doi\":\"10.1026/0049-8637/a000257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Learners utilize a variety of strategies to regulate their motivation. Theoretical models of motivational regulation imply a connection between the decision for a concrete strategy and the specific situational requirements. Accordingly, one would expect that the suitability of a strategy depends on how well it fits the motivational problem in question. Since reliable findings on this point are missing, we conducted a survey of N = 33 proven experts in the field of self-regulated learning to enlighten the suitability of nine strategies for six different motivational problems. Our findings showed that the suitability of a group of strategies was consistently considered dependent on the given motivational problem (e. g., ability-focus self-talk was suitable to enhance motivation for a difficult task) – pointing to the importance of conditional strategy knowledge for learners. For another group of strategies, experts’ suitability judgments were indifferent, indicating that strategy suitability may also comprise idiosyncratic (i. e., person-specific) aspects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Entwicklungspsychologie Und Padagogische Psychologie\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Entwicklungspsychologie Und Padagogische Psychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637/a000257\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Entwicklungspsychologie Und Padagogische Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637/a000257","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要学习者使用各种策略来调节他们的动机。动机调节的理论模型暗示了具体策略决策与具体情境要求之间的联系。因此,人们会期望策略的适用性取决于它在多大程度上符合所讨论的动机问题。由于在这一点上缺乏可靠的发现,我们对N = 33名自我调节学习领域的专家进行了调查,以启发九种策略对六种不同动机问题的适用性。我们的研究结果表明,一组策略的适用性一直被认为依赖于给定的动机问题(例如。例如,以能力为中心的自言自语适用于提高对困难任务的动机)——这表明条件策略知识对学习者的重要性。对于另一组策略,专家的适宜性判断是无关的,这表明策略适宜性也可能包含特质(即。(个人)方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Suitability of Motivational Regulation Strategies for Specific Motivational Problems
Abstract. Learners utilize a variety of strategies to regulate their motivation. Theoretical models of motivational regulation imply a connection between the decision for a concrete strategy and the specific situational requirements. Accordingly, one would expect that the suitability of a strategy depends on how well it fits the motivational problem in question. Since reliable findings on this point are missing, we conducted a survey of N = 33 proven experts in the field of self-regulated learning to enlighten the suitability of nine strategies for six different motivational problems. Our findings showed that the suitability of a group of strategies was consistently considered dependent on the given motivational problem (e. g., ability-focus self-talk was suitable to enhance motivation for a difficult task) – pointing to the importance of conditional strategy knowledge for learners. For another group of strategies, experts’ suitability judgments were indifferent, indicating that strategy suitability may also comprise idiosyncratic (i. e., person-specific) aspects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs) und der Fachgruppen Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信