罗马、迦太基和努米底亚:第三次布匿战争前的外交偏袒

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
Antichthon Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1017/ann.2018.4
C. Bailey
{"title":"罗马、迦太基和努米底亚:第三次布匿战争前的外交偏袒","authors":"C. Bailey","doi":"10.1017/ann.2018.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines Rome’s diplomatic relations with Carthage and Numidia in the period between the Second and Third Punic Wars. Polybius’ suggestion that Rome consistently decided against Carthage in territorial disputes with Numidia in the aftermath of the Second Punic War (Polyb. 31.21.5-6) has often been taken up in explanations of the origins of the Third Punic War. Many ancient and modern accounts accept the implication of a policy of hostility against Carthage, assuming that Rome permitted and even encouraged Masinissa to infringe upon and seize Carthaginian territory. This paper, however, argues that the results of Roman arbitration between Carthage and Numidia do not show a consistent policy intended to undermine Carthage. Rather, Rome sought to maintain the territorial division which was imposed at the end of the Second Punic War throughout the inter-war period; several of its decisions were actually in favour of Carthage. The Third Punic War should not be seen as a culmination of a half-century of Roman hostility towards Carthage.","PeriodicalId":41516,"journal":{"name":"Antichthon","volume":"52 1","pages":"43 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/ann.2018.4","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rome, Carthage, and Numidia: Diplomatic Favouritism before the Third Punic War\",\"authors\":\"C. Bailey\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ann.2018.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article examines Rome’s diplomatic relations with Carthage and Numidia in the period between the Second and Third Punic Wars. Polybius’ suggestion that Rome consistently decided against Carthage in territorial disputes with Numidia in the aftermath of the Second Punic War (Polyb. 31.21.5-6) has often been taken up in explanations of the origins of the Third Punic War. Many ancient and modern accounts accept the implication of a policy of hostility against Carthage, assuming that Rome permitted and even encouraged Masinissa to infringe upon and seize Carthaginian territory. This paper, however, argues that the results of Roman arbitration between Carthage and Numidia do not show a consistent policy intended to undermine Carthage. Rather, Rome sought to maintain the territorial division which was imposed at the end of the Second Punic War throughout the inter-war period; several of its decisions were actually in favour of Carthage. The Third Punic War should not be seen as a culmination of a half-century of Roman hostility towards Carthage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antichthon\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"43 - 71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/ann.2018.4\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antichthon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ann.2018.4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antichthon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ann.2018.4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了第二次和第三次布匿战争期间罗马与迦太基和努米底亚的外交关系。波利比乌斯认为,在第二次布匿战争之后,罗马在与努米底亚的领土争端中始终决定反对迦太基(波利比乌斯,31.21.5-6),这一观点经常被用来解释第三次布匿战争的起源。许多古代和现代的记载都接受了对迦太基的敌对政策的暗示,假设罗马允许甚至鼓励马西尼萨侵犯并占领迦太基的领土。然而,本文认为罗马在迦太基和努米底亚之间的仲裁结果并没有显示出一种旨在破坏迦太基的一贯政策。相反,罗马试图维持在第二次布匿战争结束时强加的领土分割;它的一些决定实际上是有利于迦太基的。第三次布匿战争不应被视为半个世纪以来罗马对迦太基敌意的高潮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rome, Carthage, and Numidia: Diplomatic Favouritism before the Third Punic War
ABSTRACT This article examines Rome’s diplomatic relations with Carthage and Numidia in the period between the Second and Third Punic Wars. Polybius’ suggestion that Rome consistently decided against Carthage in territorial disputes with Numidia in the aftermath of the Second Punic War (Polyb. 31.21.5-6) has often been taken up in explanations of the origins of the Third Punic War. Many ancient and modern accounts accept the implication of a policy of hostility against Carthage, assuming that Rome permitted and even encouraged Masinissa to infringe upon and seize Carthaginian territory. This paper, however, argues that the results of Roman arbitration between Carthage and Numidia do not show a consistent policy intended to undermine Carthage. Rather, Rome sought to maintain the territorial division which was imposed at the end of the Second Punic War throughout the inter-war period; several of its decisions were actually in favour of Carthage. The Third Punic War should not be seen as a culmination of a half-century of Roman hostility towards Carthage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antichthon
Antichthon CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信