卢克莱修论父母之爱的本质

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
Antichthon Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1017/ann.2018.1
S. McConnell
{"title":"卢克莱修论父母之爱的本质","authors":"S. McConnell","doi":"10.1017/ann.2018.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper outlines the full details of Lucretius’ treatment of parental love. It shows that Lucretius is faithful to Epicurus’ notorious claim that parental love is not natural: in addition to orthodox Epicurean hedonist concerns, Lucretius asserts that children do not ‘belong to’ their parents by nature; as such, even though parental love is now ubiquitous and indeed a cultural norm, there is no basis for the naturalness of parental love. This model of the relationship between parents and children does not, however, apply in the case of certain animals, who do have natural parental love for their offspring. Focussing on two famous scenes, the sacrifice of Iphigenia and the forlorn heifer seeking her sacrificed calf, the paper argues that, by highlighting the fragility of human parental love in comparison to that of the animals, Lucretius brings to his Roman readers’ attention the relative weakness of the familial ties that bond human beings together. At the same time, he emphasises the need to maintain these ties, if social and political concord, with all its benefits, is to continue. It transpires that unlocking the details of Lucretius’ treatment of parental love brings a key lesson of the poem into clearer focus.","PeriodicalId":41516,"journal":{"name":"Antichthon","volume":"52 1","pages":"72 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/ann.2018.1","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lucretius on the Nature of Parental Love\",\"authors\":\"S. McConnell\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ann.2018.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper outlines the full details of Lucretius’ treatment of parental love. It shows that Lucretius is faithful to Epicurus’ notorious claim that parental love is not natural: in addition to orthodox Epicurean hedonist concerns, Lucretius asserts that children do not ‘belong to’ their parents by nature; as such, even though parental love is now ubiquitous and indeed a cultural norm, there is no basis for the naturalness of parental love. This model of the relationship between parents and children does not, however, apply in the case of certain animals, who do have natural parental love for their offspring. Focussing on two famous scenes, the sacrifice of Iphigenia and the forlorn heifer seeking her sacrificed calf, the paper argues that, by highlighting the fragility of human parental love in comparison to that of the animals, Lucretius brings to his Roman readers’ attention the relative weakness of the familial ties that bond human beings together. At the same time, he emphasises the need to maintain these ties, if social and political concord, with all its benefits, is to continue. It transpires that unlocking the details of Lucretius’ treatment of parental love brings a key lesson of the poem into clearer focus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antichthon\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"72 - 89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/ann.2018.1\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antichthon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ann.2018.1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antichthon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ann.2018.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文概述了卢克莱修对待父母之爱的全部细节。这表明卢克莱修忠实于伊壁鸠鲁臭名昭著的主张,即父母的爱不是自然的:除了正统的伊壁鸠鲁享乐主义的关注之外,卢克莱修还断言,孩子天生不“属于”父母;因此,尽管父母之爱现在无处不在,而且确实是一种文化规范,但父母之爱的自然性却没有基础。然而,这种父母与子女之间关系的模式并不适用于某些动物,它们对后代确实有天生的父母之爱。这篇论文以伊菲igenia的献祭和被遗弃的小母牛寻找她牺牲的小牛这两个著名场景为重点,认为卢克莱修通过强调人类父母之爱与动物之爱相比的脆弱性,让他的罗马读者注意到将人类联系在一起的家庭关系的相对脆弱性。与此同时,他强调,如果要继续保持社会和政治和谐及其所有好处,就必须保持这些关系。揭示卢克莱修处理父母之爱的细节,使这首诗的一个关键教训变得更加清晰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lucretius on the Nature of Parental Love
Abstract This paper outlines the full details of Lucretius’ treatment of parental love. It shows that Lucretius is faithful to Epicurus’ notorious claim that parental love is not natural: in addition to orthodox Epicurean hedonist concerns, Lucretius asserts that children do not ‘belong to’ their parents by nature; as such, even though parental love is now ubiquitous and indeed a cultural norm, there is no basis for the naturalness of parental love. This model of the relationship between parents and children does not, however, apply in the case of certain animals, who do have natural parental love for their offspring. Focussing on two famous scenes, the sacrifice of Iphigenia and the forlorn heifer seeking her sacrificed calf, the paper argues that, by highlighting the fragility of human parental love in comparison to that of the animals, Lucretius brings to his Roman readers’ attention the relative weakness of the familial ties that bond human beings together. At the same time, he emphasises the need to maintain these ties, if social and political concord, with all its benefits, is to continue. It transpires that unlocking the details of Lucretius’ treatment of parental love brings a key lesson of the poem into clearer focus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antichthon
Antichthon CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信