土壤耕作方式对小麦干物质生产和水分利用效率的影响

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Cheng-Yan ZHENG, Shi-Ming CUI, Dong WANG, Zhen-Wen YU, Yong-Li ZHANG, Yu SHI
{"title":"土壤耕作方式对小麦干物质生产和水分利用效率的影响","authors":"Cheng-Yan ZHENG,&nbsp;Shi-Ming CUI,&nbsp;Dong WANG,&nbsp;Zhen-Wen YU,&nbsp;Yong-Li ZHANG,&nbsp;Yu SHI","doi":"10.1016/S1875-2780(11)60039-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective of this study was to understand the effects of tillage practice on water consumption characteristics and dry matter accumulation and distribution in wheat (<em>Triticum aestivum</em> L.) plant under high-yielding and flexible irrigation conditions. In a fixed position experiment across 3 growing seasons from October 2007 to June 2010, only one wheat cultivar, Jimai 22, was planted in the field. In the 2007–2008 wheat season, 5 tillage treatments were designed, which were strip rotary tillage (SR), strip rotary tillage after subsoiling (SRS), rotary tillage (R), rotary tillage after subsoiling (RS), and plowing tillage (P). The same treatments were arranged in the same field plots in the 2008–2009 and 2009–2010 wheat seasons, except that SRS and RS had no subsoiling. All tillage treatments were irrigated at sowing, jointing, and anthesis stages to designed soil water content based on testing soil moisture before watering. The total water consumption was higher in SRS and RS treatments than in SR and R treatments. Treatment SRS increased the amount of soil water consumption in 0–200 cm soil layers but decreased the soil evaporation, compared to other treatments. Treatments SRS and RS gained the highest amount of dry matter accumulation, grain dry matter partitioning at maturity, and contribution to grain of dry matter assimilation after anthesis, followed by treatment P, and treatments R and SR showed the lowest levels in the above parameters, particularly SR. In the experiment across 3 years, SRS obtained the grain yields of 9409.01 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> in 2008, 9613.86 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> in 2009, and 9698.42 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> in 2010, which were equivalent to that of RS but significantly higher than other treatments. Treatments P and R also exhibited higher yield level than SR treatment. In the 2008–2009 and 2009–2010 growing years, the water use efficiencies of SRS treatment were the highest among treatments, which were 21.39 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> mm<sup>−1</sup> and 22.09 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> mm<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Treatment RS also had higher water use efficiency than SR, R, and P treatments. Therefore, SRS is recommended as the optimal tillage practice in high-yielding and water-saving production system in the Yellow-Huai-Hai River Valleys Plain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7085,"journal":{"name":"Acta Agronomica Sinica","volume":"37 8","pages":"Pages 1432-1440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1875-2780(11)60039-4","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Soil Tillage Practice on Dry Matter Production and Water Use Efficiency in Wheat\",\"authors\":\"Cheng-Yan ZHENG,&nbsp;Shi-Ming CUI,&nbsp;Dong WANG,&nbsp;Zhen-Wen YU,&nbsp;Yong-Li ZHANG,&nbsp;Yu SHI\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1875-2780(11)60039-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The objective of this study was to understand the effects of tillage practice on water consumption characteristics and dry matter accumulation and distribution in wheat (<em>Triticum aestivum</em> L.) plant under high-yielding and flexible irrigation conditions. In a fixed position experiment across 3 growing seasons from October 2007 to June 2010, only one wheat cultivar, Jimai 22, was planted in the field. In the 2007–2008 wheat season, 5 tillage treatments were designed, which were strip rotary tillage (SR), strip rotary tillage after subsoiling (SRS), rotary tillage (R), rotary tillage after subsoiling (RS), and plowing tillage (P). The same treatments were arranged in the same field plots in the 2008–2009 and 2009–2010 wheat seasons, except that SRS and RS had no subsoiling. All tillage treatments were irrigated at sowing, jointing, and anthesis stages to designed soil water content based on testing soil moisture before watering. The total water consumption was higher in SRS and RS treatments than in SR and R treatments. Treatment SRS increased the amount of soil water consumption in 0–200 cm soil layers but decreased the soil evaporation, compared to other treatments. Treatments SRS and RS gained the highest amount of dry matter accumulation, grain dry matter partitioning at maturity, and contribution to grain of dry matter assimilation after anthesis, followed by treatment P, and treatments R and SR showed the lowest levels in the above parameters, particularly SR. In the experiment across 3 years, SRS obtained the grain yields of 9409.01 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> in 2008, 9613.86 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> in 2009, and 9698.42 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> in 2010, which were equivalent to that of RS but significantly higher than other treatments. Treatments P and R also exhibited higher yield level than SR treatment. In the 2008–2009 and 2009–2010 growing years, the water use efficiencies of SRS treatment were the highest among treatments, which were 21.39 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> mm<sup>−1</sup> and 22.09 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> mm<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Treatment RS also had higher water use efficiency than SR, R, and P treatments. Therefore, SRS is recommended as the optimal tillage practice in high-yielding and water-saving production system in the Yellow-Huai-Hai River Valleys Plain.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Agronomica Sinica\",\"volume\":\"37 8\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1432-1440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1875-2780(11)60039-4\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Agronomica Sinica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1091\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875278011600394\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Agronomica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"1091","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875278011600394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

本研究旨在了解高产灵活灌溉条件下不同耕作方式对小麦耗水特性和干物质积累与分配的影响。在2007年10月至2010年6月的3个生长季节的固定位置试验中,只种植了一种小麦品种吉麦22号。在2007-2008年小麦季,设计了5种耕作方式,分别为条形旋耕法(SR)、条形旋耕法(SRS)、轮耕法(R)、轮耕法(RS)和翻耕法(P)。在2008-2009年和2009-2010年小麦季,除SRS和RS不深耕外,在相同的地块布置相同的耕作方式。所有耕作处理均在播种、拔节和开花期进行灌溉,根据浇水前土壤水分测试设计土壤含水量。SRS和RS处理的总耗水量高于SR和R处理。与其他处理相比,SRS处理增加了0 ~ 200 cm土层的土壤耗水量,但减少了土壤蒸发量。SRS处理和RS处理的干物质积累量、成熟期籽粒干物质分配和花后籽粒干物质同化贡献最高,P处理次之,R和SR处理的上述参数最低,尤其是SR处理。在3年的试验中,SRS处理2008年、2009年和2010年的籽粒产量分别为9409.01 kg ha - 1、9613.86 kg ha - 1和9698.42 kg ha - 1;与RS组相当,但显著高于其他处理。P和R处理的产量也高于SR处理。在2008-2009年和2009-2010年生长期,SRS处理的水分利用效率最高,分别为21.39 kg ha - 1 mm - 1和22.09 kg ha - 1 mm - 1。RS处理的水分利用效率也高于SR、R和P处理。因此,推荐黄淮海河谷平原高产节水生产系统采用SRS耕作方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Soil Tillage Practice on Dry Matter Production and Water Use Efficiency in Wheat

The objective of this study was to understand the effects of tillage practice on water consumption characteristics and dry matter accumulation and distribution in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plant under high-yielding and flexible irrigation conditions. In a fixed position experiment across 3 growing seasons from October 2007 to June 2010, only one wheat cultivar, Jimai 22, was planted in the field. In the 2007–2008 wheat season, 5 tillage treatments were designed, which were strip rotary tillage (SR), strip rotary tillage after subsoiling (SRS), rotary tillage (R), rotary tillage after subsoiling (RS), and plowing tillage (P). The same treatments were arranged in the same field plots in the 2008–2009 and 2009–2010 wheat seasons, except that SRS and RS had no subsoiling. All tillage treatments were irrigated at sowing, jointing, and anthesis stages to designed soil water content based on testing soil moisture before watering. The total water consumption was higher in SRS and RS treatments than in SR and R treatments. Treatment SRS increased the amount of soil water consumption in 0–200 cm soil layers but decreased the soil evaporation, compared to other treatments. Treatments SRS and RS gained the highest amount of dry matter accumulation, grain dry matter partitioning at maturity, and contribution to grain of dry matter assimilation after anthesis, followed by treatment P, and treatments R and SR showed the lowest levels in the above parameters, particularly SR. In the experiment across 3 years, SRS obtained the grain yields of 9409.01 kg ha−1 in 2008, 9613.86 kg ha−1 in 2009, and 9698.42 kg ha−1 in 2010, which were equivalent to that of RS but significantly higher than other treatments. Treatments P and R also exhibited higher yield level than SR treatment. In the 2008–2009 and 2009–2010 growing years, the water use efficiencies of SRS treatment were the highest among treatments, which were 21.39 kg ha−1 mm−1 and 22.09 kg ha−1 mm−1, respectively. Treatment RS also had higher water use efficiency than SR, R, and P treatments. Therefore, SRS is recommended as the optimal tillage practice in high-yielding and water-saving production system in the Yellow-Huai-Hai River Valleys Plain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信