结合基因组信息的中国荷斯坦猪育种方案评价

Jun CHEN , Ya-chun WANG , Yi ZHANG, Dong-xiao SUN, Sheng-li ZHANG, Yuan ZHANG
{"title":"结合基因组信息的中国荷斯坦猪育种方案评价","authors":"Jun CHEN ,&nbsp;Ya-chun WANG ,&nbsp;Yi ZHANG,&nbsp;Dong-xiao SUN,&nbsp;Sheng-li ZHANG,&nbsp;Yuan ZHANG","doi":"10.1016/S1671-2927(11)60196-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Abstract</h3><p>Current study adopted gene flow theory and selection index method to compare the breeding efficiency of three breeding plans in the Chinese Holstein cattle using ZPLAN software. Simulated conventional progeny-testing program (PT) and young sire program (YS) were compared with breeding program using genomic selection (GS) taking parameters derived from Chinese Holstein breeding system. The results showed that, GS shortened generation interval by 1.5-2.2 years, and increased the genetic progress by 30-50%, comparing to PT and YS, respectively. Economic analysis showed that GS could obtain a higher breeding efficiency, being 119 and 97% higher than that of PT and YS, respectively; and GS was also powerful in improving functional traits with a low heritability. Main factors affecting breeding efficiency in GS were further discussed, including selection intensity, accuracy and the cost of SNP genotyping. Our finding provided references for future designing and implementing GS in Chinese dairy population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7475,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Sciences in China","volume":"10 12","pages":"Pages 1949-1957"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1671-2927(11)60196-X","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Breeding Programs Combining Genomic Information in Chinese Holstein\",\"authors\":\"Jun CHEN ,&nbsp;Ya-chun WANG ,&nbsp;Yi ZHANG,&nbsp;Dong-xiao SUN,&nbsp;Sheng-li ZHANG,&nbsp;Yuan ZHANG\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1671-2927(11)60196-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Abstract</h3><p>Current study adopted gene flow theory and selection index method to compare the breeding efficiency of three breeding plans in the Chinese Holstein cattle using ZPLAN software. Simulated conventional progeny-testing program (PT) and young sire program (YS) were compared with breeding program using genomic selection (GS) taking parameters derived from Chinese Holstein breeding system. The results showed that, GS shortened generation interval by 1.5-2.2 years, and increased the genetic progress by 30-50%, comparing to PT and YS, respectively. Economic analysis showed that GS could obtain a higher breeding efficiency, being 119 and 97% higher than that of PT and YS, respectively; and GS was also powerful in improving functional traits with a low heritability. Main factors affecting breeding efficiency in GS were further discussed, including selection intensity, accuracy and the cost of SNP genotyping. Our finding provided references for future designing and implementing GS in Chinese dairy population.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Sciences in China\",\"volume\":\"10 12\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1949-1957\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1671-2927(11)60196-X\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Sciences in China\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S167129271160196X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Sciences in China","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S167129271160196X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要本研究采用基因流理论和选择指数法,利用ZPLAN软件对中国荷斯坦牛3种育种方案的育种效率进行比较。采用基因组选择(GS)方法,以中国荷斯坦种猪育种系统为参数,对模拟常规子代检测方案(PT)和幼父方案(YS)进行了比较。结果表明,与PT和YS相比,GS分别缩短了1.5 ~ 2.2年的世代间隔,提高了30 ~ 50%的遗传进度。经济分析表明,GS能获得较高的育种效率,分别比PT和YS高119和97%;GS对低遗传力的功能性状也有较强的改良作用。进一步讨论了影响GS育种效率的主要因素,包括选择强度、SNP基因分型的准确性和成本。本研究结果为今后在中国乳制品人群中设计和实施GS提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Breeding Programs Combining Genomic Information in Chinese Holstein

Abstract

Current study adopted gene flow theory and selection index method to compare the breeding efficiency of three breeding plans in the Chinese Holstein cattle using ZPLAN software. Simulated conventional progeny-testing program (PT) and young sire program (YS) were compared with breeding program using genomic selection (GS) taking parameters derived from Chinese Holstein breeding system. The results showed that, GS shortened generation interval by 1.5-2.2 years, and increased the genetic progress by 30-50%, comparing to PT and YS, respectively. Economic analysis showed that GS could obtain a higher breeding efficiency, being 119 and 97% higher than that of PT and YS, respectively; and GS was also powerful in improving functional traits with a low heritability. Main factors affecting breeding efficiency in GS were further discussed, including selection intensity, accuracy and the cost of SNP genotyping. Our finding provided references for future designing and implementing GS in Chinese dairy population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Sciences in China
Agricultural Sciences in China AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3.2 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信