在ABC新闻黄金时间直播的支持下进行的这项研究发现,在处理的100张处方中,有4个具有临床意义的配药错误

Elizabeth L. Allan PhD (postdoctoral fellow), Kenneth N. Barker PhD (professor and head), Michael J. Malloy PharmD, associate professor, William M. Heller PhD
{"title":"在ABC新闻黄金时间直播的支持下进行的这项研究发现,在处理的100张处方中,有4个具有临床意义的配药错误","authors":"Elizabeth L. Allan PhD (postdoctoral fellow),&nbsp;Kenneth N. Barker PhD (professor and head),&nbsp;Michael J. Malloy PharmD, associate professor,&nbsp;William M. Heller PhD","doi":"10.1016/S0160-3450(15)30002-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A disguised-patient technique was used to study the nature and frec^jency of dispensing errors and quality of patient medication counseling in 100 randomly selected community pharmacies. Analysis of 100 prescription orders dispensed detected 24 dispensing errors, of which 4 were clinically significant. Oral counseling was provided to 64 of the patients, covering an average of 3 of the 14 categories of drug information that the Omnibus Budget Réconciliation Act of 1990 (OBRA 90׳) requires pharmacists to consider when counseling Medicaid patients. In addition to pre- scriber׳s label instructions, pharmacists provided written counseling information, including auxiliary labels and receipts, to 98% of the patients, but it covered only an average of six OBRA 90׳ categories.</p><p>The results suggest that problems with the quality of community pharmacy medication counseling and dispensing accuracy require immediate attention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75481,"journal":{"name":"American pharmacy","volume":"35 12","pages":"Pages 25-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0160-3450(15)30002-7","citationCount":"56","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"This study conducted with the support of ABC News PrimeTime Live, found four clinically significant dispensing errors in 100 prescriptions processed\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth L. Allan PhD (postdoctoral fellow),&nbsp;Kenneth N. Barker PhD (professor and head),&nbsp;Michael J. Malloy PharmD, associate professor,&nbsp;William M. Heller PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0160-3450(15)30002-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A disguised-patient technique was used to study the nature and frec^jency of dispensing errors and quality of patient medication counseling in 100 randomly selected community pharmacies. Analysis of 100 prescription orders dispensed detected 24 dispensing errors, of which 4 were clinically significant. Oral counseling was provided to 64 of the patients, covering an average of 3 of the 14 categories of drug information that the Omnibus Budget Réconciliation Act of 1990 (OBRA 90׳) requires pharmacists to consider when counseling Medicaid patients. In addition to pre- scriber׳s label instructions, pharmacists provided written counseling information, including auxiliary labels and receipts, to 98% of the patients, but it covered only an average of six OBRA 90׳ categories.</p><p>The results suggest that problems with the quality of community pharmacy medication counseling and dispensing accuracy require immediate attention.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"35 12\",\"pages\":\"Pages 25-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0160-3450(15)30002-7\",\"citationCount\":\"56\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160345015300027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160345015300027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

摘要

采用伪装患者技术,对随机抽取的100家社区药房配药错误的性质、频率和患者用药咨询的质量进行了研究。通过对100张处方单的分析,发现24个配药错误,其中4个具有临床意义。向64名患者提供了口头咨询,平均涵盖了《1990年综合预算法案》要求药剂师在咨询医疗补助患者时考虑的14类药物信息中的3类。除了处方药物的标签说明外,药剂师还向98%的患者提供了书面咨询信息,包括辅助标签和收据,但它仅涵盖了平均6个OBRA 90变化类别。结果表明,社区药房用药咨询质量和调剂准确性等问题亟待重视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
This study conducted with the support of ABC News PrimeTime Live, found four clinically significant dispensing errors in 100 prescriptions processed

A disguised-patient technique was used to study the nature and frec^jency of dispensing errors and quality of patient medication counseling in 100 randomly selected community pharmacies. Analysis of 100 prescription orders dispensed detected 24 dispensing errors, of which 4 were clinically significant. Oral counseling was provided to 64 of the patients, covering an average of 3 of the 14 categories of drug information that the Omnibus Budget Réconciliation Act of 1990 (OBRA 90׳) requires pharmacists to consider when counseling Medicaid patients. In addition to pre- scriber׳s label instructions, pharmacists provided written counseling information, including auxiliary labels and receipts, to 98% of the patients, but it covered only an average of six OBRA 90׳ categories.

The results suggest that problems with the quality of community pharmacy medication counseling and dispensing accuracy require immediate attention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信