E. Marchetti , S. Mummolo , G. Marzo , A. Civisca , C. Di Pietro , G. Marinelli
{"title":"与乙醇溶液相比,精油漱口水对近端菌斑还原和炎症的影响","authors":"E. Marchetti , S. Mummolo , G. Marzo , A. Civisca , C. Di Pietro , G. Marinelli","doi":"10.1016/j.pad.2009.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess whether the well-documented action of a mouthrinse is due either to its content in essential oils as active ingredients or to its high concentration of ethanol as a solvent.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This randomized, controlled, parallel clinical trial lasted four weeks. Twenty-eight subjects were enrolled and equally divided into two groups of 14 subjects each. The first group was given a mouthrinse (Listerine), whereas the second group was given a hydroalcoholic solution containing 21.3% ethanol. All patients were instructed to rinse their mouth twice a day for four weeks. The approximal plaque index (API) and the papillary bleeding index (PBI) were used to assess hygiene and interproximal inflammation levels, which were measured at t<sub>0</sub>, t<sub>14</sub> e t<sub>28</sub>.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>API and PBI indexes showed a statistically significant decrease in the first group; on the contrary, there were negligible variations in the control group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of this clinical trial suggest that the action of the examined mouthrinse is not due to its high concentration of ethanol, but to its contents in essential oils.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77593,"journal":{"name":"Prevenzione & assistenza dentale","volume":"35 4","pages":"Pages 123-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.pad.2009.04.003","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effetto di un collutorio agli oli essenziali nella riduzione di placca e infiammazione interprossimali rispetto a una soluzione a base di etanolo\",\"authors\":\"E. Marchetti , S. Mummolo , G. Marzo , A. Civisca , C. Di Pietro , G. Marinelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pad.2009.04.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess whether the well-documented action of a mouthrinse is due either to its content in essential oils as active ingredients or to its high concentration of ethanol as a solvent.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This randomized, controlled, parallel clinical trial lasted four weeks. Twenty-eight subjects were enrolled and equally divided into two groups of 14 subjects each. The first group was given a mouthrinse (Listerine), whereas the second group was given a hydroalcoholic solution containing 21.3% ethanol. All patients were instructed to rinse their mouth twice a day for four weeks. The approximal plaque index (API) and the papillary bleeding index (PBI) were used to assess hygiene and interproximal inflammation levels, which were measured at t<sub>0</sub>, t<sub>14</sub> e t<sub>28</sub>.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>API and PBI indexes showed a statistically significant decrease in the first group; on the contrary, there were negligible variations in the control group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of this clinical trial suggest that the action of the examined mouthrinse is not due to its high concentration of ethanol, but to its contents in essential oils.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prevenzione & assistenza dentale\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 123-127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.pad.2009.04.003\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prevenzione & assistenza dentale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0393996009000511\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevenzione & assistenza dentale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0393996009000511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effetto di un collutorio agli oli essenziali nella riduzione di placca e infiammazione interprossimali rispetto a una soluzione a base di etanolo
Objectives
To assess whether the well-documented action of a mouthrinse is due either to its content in essential oils as active ingredients or to its high concentration of ethanol as a solvent.
Materials and methods
This randomized, controlled, parallel clinical trial lasted four weeks. Twenty-eight subjects were enrolled and equally divided into two groups of 14 subjects each. The first group was given a mouthrinse (Listerine), whereas the second group was given a hydroalcoholic solution containing 21.3% ethanol. All patients were instructed to rinse their mouth twice a day for four weeks. The approximal plaque index (API) and the papillary bleeding index (PBI) were used to assess hygiene and interproximal inflammation levels, which were measured at t0, t14 e t28.
Results
API and PBI indexes showed a statistically significant decrease in the first group; on the contrary, there were negligible variations in the control group.
Conclusions
The results of this clinical trial suggest that the action of the examined mouthrinse is not due to its high concentration of ethanol, but to its contents in essential oils.