生物伦理话语的议会工厂:讨论舞台的分析

IF 0.6 4区心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY

Pratiques Psychologiques Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.prps.2020.03.003

M. Doumergue, N. Kalampalikis

{"title":"生物伦理话语的议会工厂:讨论舞台的分析","authors":"M. Doumergue, N. Kalampalikis","doi":"10.1016/j.prps.2020.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Each revision of the law on bioethics triggers a political and social debate in public space and communication. This article examines the analysis of this arena of discourse during the second revision of the bioethics law in 2011, in order to observe what representational systems are involved by the members of the French parliament to think about and discuss on these socially important issues. More specifically, we focus on what may have led parliamentarians to decide in 2011 to maintain the anonymity of gamete donation, whereas this issue had been at the heart of intense public controversy since the mid-2000s.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54590,"journal":{"name":"Pratiques Psychologiques","volume":"26 4","pages":"Pages 279-294"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.prps.2020.03.003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La fabrique parlementaire du discours bioéthique : analyse d’une arène de discussions\",\"authors\":\"M. Doumergue, N. Kalampalikis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prps.2020.03.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Each revision of the law on bioethics triggers a political and social debate in public space and communication. This article examines the analysis of this arena of discourse during the second revision of the bioethics law in 2011, in order to observe what representational systems are involved by the members of the French parliament to think about and discuss on these socially important issues. More specifically, we focus on what may have led parliamentarians to decide in 2011 to maintain the anonymity of gamete donation, whereas this issue had been at the heart of intense public controversy since the mid-2000s.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pratiques Psychologiques\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 279-294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.prps.2020.03.003\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pratiques Psychologiques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1269176320300377\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pratiques Psychologiques","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1269176320300377","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

生命伦理法的每次修订都会在公共空间和交流中引发政治和社会辩论。本文考察了2011年生物伦理学法第二次修订期间对这一话语领域的分析，以观察法国议会成员参与哪些代表性制度来思考和讨论这些重要的社会问题。更具体地说，我们关注的是可能导致议员们在2011年决定保持配子捐赠匿名的原因，而这个问题自2000年代中期以来一直是激烈的公众争议的核心。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

La fabrique parlementaire du discours bioéthique : analyse d’une arène de discussions

Each revision of the law on bioethics triggers a political and social debate in public space and communication. This article examines the analysis of this arena of discourse during the second revision of the bioethics law in 2011, in order to observe what representational systems are involved by the members of the French parliament to think about and discuss on these socially important issues. More specifically, we focus on what may have led parliamentarians to decide in 2011 to maintain the anonymity of gamete donation, whereas this issue had been at the heart of intense public controversy since the mid-2000s.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Pratiques Psychologiques PSYCHOLOGY-

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

81 days

期刊介绍： Pratiques psychologiques is an official publication of the ''Société française de psychologie''. It publishes thematic issues, and concentrates on the applications in the psychological practice. It covers all fields of psychology.