Paul Ryus , Kaitlyn Schaffer , Albert Gan , Nancy Doherty
{"title":"美国农村和小城市交通机构同行分组的方法","authors":"Paul Ryus , Kaitlyn Schaffer , Albert Gan , Nancy Doherty","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubtr.2022.100028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Peer comparison is a valuable management tool for identifying a transit provider’s areas of relative strength, areas with room for improvement, and high-performing peers to learn from. While the U.S. Rural National Transit Database (NTD) provides performance data about rural and small city transit providers, methods and tools have been lacking for these providers to apply NTD data to identify appropriate peers. This paper describes the development of a rural transit peer-grouping method as a counterpart to a method previously developed and implemented for urban providers, and compares this method to previous transit peer-grouping approaches. In contrast to most previous efforts, which have produced fixed and often large peer groups, this method dynamically and transparently identifies appropriate peers for individual rural and small city transit providers. The method has been implemented in freely available web-based software.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47173,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Transportation","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100028"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X22000285/pdfft?md5=4d8452356150b71dc38d4e57a47c561e&pid=1-s2.0-S1077291X22000285-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodology for rural and small-city U.S. transit agency peer grouping\",\"authors\":\"Paul Ryus , Kaitlyn Schaffer , Albert Gan , Nancy Doherty\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpubtr.2022.100028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Peer comparison is a valuable management tool for identifying a transit provider’s areas of relative strength, areas with room for improvement, and high-performing peers to learn from. While the U.S. Rural National Transit Database (NTD) provides performance data about rural and small city transit providers, methods and tools have been lacking for these providers to apply NTD data to identify appropriate peers. This paper describes the development of a rural transit peer-grouping method as a counterpart to a method previously developed and implemented for urban providers, and compares this method to previous transit peer-grouping approaches. In contrast to most previous efforts, which have produced fixed and often large peer groups, this method dynamically and transparently identifies appropriate peers for individual rural and small city transit providers. The method has been implemented in freely available web-based software.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Transportation\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100028\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X22000285/pdfft?md5=4d8452356150b71dc38d4e57a47c561e&pid=1-s2.0-S1077291X22000285-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X22000285\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X22000285","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Methodology for rural and small-city U.S. transit agency peer grouping
Peer comparison is a valuable management tool for identifying a transit provider’s areas of relative strength, areas with room for improvement, and high-performing peers to learn from. While the U.S. Rural National Transit Database (NTD) provides performance data about rural and small city transit providers, methods and tools have been lacking for these providers to apply NTD data to identify appropriate peers. This paper describes the development of a rural transit peer-grouping method as a counterpart to a method previously developed and implemented for urban providers, and compares this method to previous transit peer-grouping approaches. In contrast to most previous efforts, which have produced fixed and often large peer groups, this method dynamically and transparently identifies appropriate peers for individual rural and small city transit providers. The method has been implemented in freely available web-based software.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Public Transportation, affiliated with the Center for Urban Transportation Research, is an international peer-reviewed open access journal focused on various forms of public transportation. It publishes original research from diverse academic disciplines, including engineering, economics, planning, and policy, emphasizing innovative solutions to transportation challenges. Content covers mobility services available to the general public, such as line-based services and shared fleets, offering insights beneficial to passengers, agencies, service providers, and communities.