简化抗逆转录病毒治疗:一个很好的选择,为我们的病人和我们的卫生保健系统的可持续性

L. González Rivas , E. Sánchez Gómez , R. Sánchez del Moral , S. Grutzmancher Saiz , E. Pujol de la Llave , C. Bocanegra Martín
{"title":"简化抗逆转录病毒治疗:一个很好的选择,为我们的病人和我们的卫生保健系统的可持续性","authors":"L. González Rivas ,&nbsp;E. Sánchez Gómez ,&nbsp;R. Sánchez del Moral ,&nbsp;S. Grutzmancher Saiz ,&nbsp;E. Pujol de la Llave ,&nbsp;C. Bocanegra Martín","doi":"10.1016/j.farmae.2011.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe the efficacy, safety, compliance and cost savings of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Observational, descriptive and retrospective study evaluating monotherapy. Adherence was calculated using an objective method. We estimated the direct costs of dispensing non-triple therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 17 patients. Interval adherence was &gt;95% in 9 patients, 90%–95% in 2 patients, 90%–85% in 2 patients, and less than 85% in 4 patients. Viral load was undetectable during weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48, except in 2 patients. The CD4 count in most analytical tests remained at &gt;350<!--> <!-->cells/ml, only 1 patient had a lower figure. The average savings was 4819 Euros/patient/year (range 1116–8700).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In selected patients, monotherapy can be a cost-effective treatment option.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"35 6","pages":"Pages 317-321"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.farmae.2011.01.001","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simplification of Antiretroviral Therapy: A Good Choice for Our Patients and the Sustainability of Our Health Care System\",\"authors\":\"L. González Rivas ,&nbsp;E. Sánchez Gómez ,&nbsp;R. Sánchez del Moral ,&nbsp;S. Grutzmancher Saiz ,&nbsp;E. Pujol de la Llave ,&nbsp;C. Bocanegra Martín\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.farmae.2011.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe the efficacy, safety, compliance and cost savings of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Observational, descriptive and retrospective study evaluating monotherapy. Adherence was calculated using an objective method. We estimated the direct costs of dispensing non-triple therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 17 patients. Interval adherence was &gt;95% in 9 patients, 90%–95% in 2 patients, 90%–85% in 2 patients, and less than 85% in 4 patients. Viral load was undetectable during weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48, except in 2 patients. The CD4 count in most analytical tests remained at &gt;350<!--> <!-->cells/ml, only 1 patient had a lower figure. The average savings was 4819 Euros/patient/year (range 1116–8700).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In selected patients, monotherapy can be a cost-effective treatment option.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"35 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 317-321\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.farmae.2011.01.001\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508512000044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508512000044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的评价洛匹那韦/利托那韦单药治疗的疗效、安全性、依从性和成本节约。方法采用观察性、描述性和回顾性研究评价单药治疗。采用客观方法计算依从性。我们估计了分配非三联疗法的直接成本。结果17例患者。9例患者的间歇依从性为95%,2例患者为90% ~ 95%,2例患者为90% ~ 85%,4例患者小于85%。在第12、24、36和48周,除2例患者外,未检测到病毒载量。在大多数分析测试中,CD4细胞计数保持在350细胞/ml,只有1例患者的数字较低。平均节省4819欧元/病人/年(范围1116-8700)。结论在选定的患者中,单药治疗是一种经济有效的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simplification of Antiretroviral Therapy: A Good Choice for Our Patients and the Sustainability of Our Health Care System

Objective

To describe the efficacy, safety, compliance and cost savings of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy.

Method

Observational, descriptive and retrospective study evaluating monotherapy. Adherence was calculated using an objective method. We estimated the direct costs of dispensing non-triple therapy.

Results

We identified 17 patients. Interval adherence was >95% in 9 patients, 90%–95% in 2 patients, 90%–85% in 2 patients, and less than 85% in 4 patients. Viral load was undetectable during weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48, except in 2 patients. The CD4 count in most analytical tests remained at >350 cells/ml, only 1 patient had a lower figure. The average savings was 4819 Euros/patient/year (range 1116–8700).

Conclusions

In selected patients, monotherapy can be a cost-effective treatment option.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信