同行评审制度：期刊编辑的 30 年展望》。

IF 0.7 4区医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS

Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-14 DOI:10.1016/j.cpm.2023.07.009

Warren S Joseph

{"title":"同行评审制度：期刊编辑的 30 年展望》。","authors":"Warren S Joseph","doi":"10.1016/j.cpm.2023.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The peer review system has become the standard by which scientific articles are refereed. Unfortunately, even from its beginnings in the mid-1800s it has been fraught with difficulties. Potential reviewers are volunteers who may be inundated with requests to review yet these reviews take considerable time and effort. There is little motivation to complete a review causing significant delays in the publication process. There may be biases unintentionally built into the system between reviewers, authors, editors, and journals. Attempts to overcome these biases by various blinding schemes have been met with limited success. Finally, the recent advent of Artificial Intelligence has the potential to completely upend the system, for good or bad.","PeriodicalId":48939,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Peer Review System: A Journal Editor's 30-Year Perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Warren S Joseph\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpm.2023.07.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The peer review system has become the standard by which scientific articles are refereed. Unfortunately, even from its beginnings in the mid-1800s it has been fraught with difficulties. Potential reviewers are volunteers who may be inundated with requests to review yet these reviews take considerable time and effort. There is little motivation to complete a review causing significant delays in the publication process. There may be biases unintentionally built into the system between reviewers, authors, editors, and journals. Attempts to overcome these biases by various blinding schemes have been met with limited success. Finally, the recent advent of Artificial Intelligence has the potential to completely upend the system, for good or bad.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2023.07.009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2023.07.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

同行评审制度已成为科学文章的评审标准。遗憾的是，即使从 1800 年代中期开始，同行评审制度也一直困难重重。潜在的审稿人都是志愿者，他们可能会被大量的审稿请求淹没，但这些审稿需要花费大量的时间和精力。审稿人完成审稿的积极性不高，导致出版过程严重延误。审稿人、作者、编辑和期刊之间的系统可能无意中存在偏见。人们试图通过各种盲法克服这些偏见，但收效甚微。最后，最近出现的人工智能有可能彻底颠覆这一系统，无论好坏。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Peer Review System: A Journal Editor's 30-Year Perspective.

The peer review system has become the standard by which scientific articles are refereed. Unfortunately, even from its beginnings in the mid-1800s it has been fraught with difficulties. Potential reviewers are volunteers who may be inundated with requests to review yet these reviews take considerable time and effort. There is little motivation to complete a review causing significant delays in the publication process. There may be biases unintentionally built into the system between reviewers, authors, editors, and journals. Attempts to overcome these biases by various blinding schemes have been met with limited success. Finally, the recent advent of Artificial Intelligence has the potential to completely upend the system, for good or bad.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Each issue of Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery updates you on the latest trends in patient management, keeps you up to date on the newest advances, and provides a sound basis for choosing treatment options. Each issue focuses on a single topic in podiatry and is presented under the direction of an experienced editor. Topics include charcot foot, the diabetic foot, imaging, pain management, ankle arthritis, foot and ankle arthroscopy, bunions, athletic injuries, wound and bone healing, fractures, dislocations, sprains, torn ligaments, amputations, infections, tumors, congenital deformities, and joint destruction.