脊柱健康:脊骨疗法的支柱

Q3 Health Professions
Richard A. Brown DC, LLM, FRCC
{"title":"脊柱健康:脊骨疗法的支柱","authors":"Richard A. Brown DC, LLM, FRCC","doi":"10.1016/j.echu.2016.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The purpose of this commentary is to explore the concepts underpinning professional identity, assess their relevance to chiropractic<span>, and propose a model by which a strong identity for the chiropractic profession may be achieved.</span></p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p><span>The professional identity of chiropractic has been a constant source of controversy throughout its history. Attempts to establish a professional identity have been met with resistance from internal factions divided over linguistics, philosophy, technique, and chiropractic’s place in the health care framework. Consequently, the establishment of a clear identity has been challenging, and the chiropractic profession has failed to capitalize on its potential as the profession of spine care experts. Recent identity consultations have produced similar statements that position </span>chiropractors as spinal health and well-being experts. Adoption of this identity, however, has not been universal, perpetuating the uncertainty with which the public regards the chiropractic profession.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>To gain public and professional acceptance, chiropractic must be unequivocal in declaring its scope, expertise, and intent. Failure to do so will lead to obscurity as other professions acquire necessary skills and position themselves as the custodians of spine care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","volume":"23 1","pages":"Pages 22-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.echu.2016.07.002","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spinal Health: The Backbone of Chiropractic’s Identity\",\"authors\":\"Richard A. Brown DC, LLM, FRCC\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.echu.2016.07.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The purpose of this commentary is to explore the concepts underpinning professional identity, assess their relevance to chiropractic<span>, and propose a model by which a strong identity for the chiropractic profession may be achieved.</span></p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p><span>The professional identity of chiropractic has been a constant source of controversy throughout its history. Attempts to establish a professional identity have been met with resistance from internal factions divided over linguistics, philosophy, technique, and chiropractic’s place in the health care framework. Consequently, the establishment of a clear identity has been challenging, and the chiropractic profession has failed to capitalize on its potential as the profession of spine care experts. Recent identity consultations have produced similar statements that position </span>chiropractors as spinal health and well-being experts. Adoption of this identity, however, has not been universal, perpetuating the uncertainty with which the public regards the chiropractic profession.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>To gain public and professional acceptance, chiropractic must be unequivocal in declaring its scope, expertise, and intent. Failure to do so will lead to obscurity as other professions acquire necessary skills and position themselves as the custodians of spine care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 22-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.echu.2016.07.002\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556349916300109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556349916300109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

本评论的目的是探讨支撑职业认同的概念,评估其与脊椎指压疗法的相关性,并提出一个模型,通过该模型可以实现对脊椎指压疗法职业的强烈认同。脊椎指压治疗的职业身份在其历史上一直是争议的来源。试图建立一种职业身份的尝试遇到了来自内部派系的阻力,这些派系在语言学、哲学、技术和脊椎指压疗法在医疗保健框架中的地位上存在分歧。因此,建立一个明确的身份是具有挑战性的,脊椎按摩专业未能充分利用其作为脊柱护理专家的潜力。最近的身份咨询产生了类似的声明,将脊医定位为脊柱健康和福祉专家。然而,采用这种身份并不是普遍的,这使公众对脊椎指压治疗职业的不确定性永久化。结论:为了获得公众和专业人士的认可,脊椎指压治疗必须明确声明其范围、专业知识和目的。不这样做将导致默默无闻,因为其他专业获得必要的技能,并将自己定位为脊柱护理的监护人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spinal Health: The Backbone of Chiropractic’s Identity

Objectives

The purpose of this commentary is to explore the concepts underpinning professional identity, assess their relevance to chiropractic, and propose a model by which a strong identity for the chiropractic profession may be achieved.

Discussion

The professional identity of chiropractic has been a constant source of controversy throughout its history. Attempts to establish a professional identity have been met with resistance from internal factions divided over linguistics, philosophy, technique, and chiropractic’s place in the health care framework. Consequently, the establishment of a clear identity has been challenging, and the chiropractic profession has failed to capitalize on its potential as the profession of spine care experts. Recent identity consultations have produced similar statements that position chiropractors as spinal health and well-being experts. Adoption of this identity, however, has not been universal, perpetuating the uncertainty with which the public regards the chiropractic profession.

Conclusion

To gain public and professional acceptance, chiropractic must be unequivocal in declaring its scope, expertise, and intent. Failure to do so will lead to obscurity as other professions acquire necessary skills and position themselves as the custodians of spine care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chiropractic Humanities
Journal of Chiropractic Humanities Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信