眼科护理质量评价指标体系的信度和效度

Jing-Hua Shi , Lu Liu , Ya-Qin Li
{"title":"眼科护理质量评价指标体系的信度和效度","authors":"Jing-Hua Shi ,&nbsp;Lu Liu ,&nbsp;Ya-Qin Li","doi":"10.1016/j.cnre.2016.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of an indicator system for assessing the quality of ophthalmic nursing.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A questionnaire-based study was performed for 218 individuals in clinical nursing management using this indicator system. The resulting data were compiled and analyzed using Excel 2003 and SPSS 13.0, and tests of reliability and validity were conducted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The indicator system yielded an overall Cronbach's ɑ value of 0.948, a test-retest reliability of 0.793, 3-dimensional Cronbach's ɑ values of 0.870–0.930, and a content validity of 0.92. Exploratory factor analysis was then performed to extract three common factors, which generated a cumulative contribution rate of 54.04%. The load range of each factor was 0.43–0.83.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The indicator system for evaluating the quality of ophthalmic nursing has favorable reliability and validity, which means that it is a suitable clinical tool for assessing the quality of ophthalmic nursing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":57172,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Nursing","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages 158-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cnre.2016.11.004","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and validity of an indicator system for assessing the quality of ophthalmic nursing\",\"authors\":\"Jing-Hua Shi ,&nbsp;Lu Liu ,&nbsp;Ya-Qin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cnre.2016.11.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of an indicator system for assessing the quality of ophthalmic nursing.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A questionnaire-based study was performed for 218 individuals in clinical nursing management using this indicator system. The resulting data were compiled and analyzed using Excel 2003 and SPSS 13.0, and tests of reliability and validity were conducted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The indicator system yielded an overall Cronbach's ɑ value of 0.948, a test-retest reliability of 0.793, 3-dimensional Cronbach's ɑ values of 0.870–0.930, and a content validity of 0.92. Exploratory factor analysis was then performed to extract three common factors, which generated a cumulative contribution rate of 54.04%. The load range of each factor was 0.43–0.83.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The indicator system for evaluating the quality of ophthalmic nursing has favorable reliability and validity, which means that it is a suitable clinical tool for assessing the quality of ophthalmic nursing.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":57172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers of Nursing\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 158-161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cnre.2016.11.004\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers of Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095771816300925\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095771816300925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的探讨眼科护理质量评价指标体系的信度和效度。方法采用该指标体系对218名临床护理管理人员进行问卷调查。采用Excel 2003和SPSS 13.0对所得数据进行整理和分析,并进行信度和效度检验。结果该指标体系的总体Cronbach’s系数为0.948,重测信度为0.793,三维Cronbach’s系数为0.870 ~ 0.930,内容效度为0.92。然后进行探索性因子分析,提取3个共同因子,累积贡献率为54.04%。各因子的负荷范围为0.43 ~ 0.83。结论所建立的眼科护理质量评价指标体系具有良好的信度和效度,可作为眼科护理质量评价的临床工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability and validity of an indicator system for assessing the quality of ophthalmic nursing

Objective

The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of an indicator system for assessing the quality of ophthalmic nursing.

Methods

A questionnaire-based study was performed for 218 individuals in clinical nursing management using this indicator system. The resulting data were compiled and analyzed using Excel 2003 and SPSS 13.0, and tests of reliability and validity were conducted.

Results

The indicator system yielded an overall Cronbach's ɑ value of 0.948, a test-retest reliability of 0.793, 3-dimensional Cronbach's ɑ values of 0.870–0.930, and a content validity of 0.92. Exploratory factor analysis was then performed to extract three common factors, which generated a cumulative contribution rate of 54.04%. The load range of each factor was 0.43–0.83.

Conclusions

The indicator system for evaluating the quality of ophthalmic nursing has favorable reliability and validity, which means that it is a suitable clinical tool for assessing the quality of ophthalmic nursing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
353
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信