"只是能量不同而已":远程医疗过渡时期治疗关系的变化。

IF 2.7 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK
Clinical Social Work Journal Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-25 DOI:10.1007/s10615-022-00844-0
Judith L M McCoyd, Laura Curran, Elsa Candelario, Patricia Findley
{"title":"\"只是能量不同而已\":远程医疗过渡时期治疗关系的变化。","authors":"Judith L M McCoyd, Laura Curran, Elsa Candelario, Patricia Findley","doi":"10.1007/s10615-022-00844-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The therapeutic relationship (TR), including its therapeutic frame, is the foundation of the therapeutic endeavor. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the rapid transition to videoconferencing for therapeutic encounters, we employed a cross-sectional exploratory survey with 1490 respondents to understand how practitioners adapted to the changes. In this secondary analysis focused on the TR, we analyze the clinicians' (N = 448) spontaneous narratives about facets of the TR. Temporally, we focused on how these adaptations occurred during the initial part of the pandemic before vaccination was available and while the TR was still adapting to teletherapy videoconferencing under the duress of pandemic crises. We find three broad themes: (1) It is a \"much more remote relationship\"; (2) The \"connection…remains surprisingly strong\"; and (3) It is \"energetically taxing.\" Each reflects clinicians' views of the TR as altered, but surprisingly resilient. Although grateful for the safety of virtual therapeutic encounters, clinicians mourned the loss of an embodied encounter, experienced depletion of energy beyond Zoom fatigue, and nonetheless recognized their clients' and their own abilities to adapt.</p>","PeriodicalId":47314,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Social Work Journal","volume":"50 1","pages":"325-336"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9035977/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"There is Just a Different Energy\\\": Changes in the Therapeutic Relationship with the Telehealth Transition.\",\"authors\":\"Judith L M McCoyd, Laura Curran, Elsa Candelario, Patricia Findley\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10615-022-00844-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The therapeutic relationship (TR), including its therapeutic frame, is the foundation of the therapeutic endeavor. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the rapid transition to videoconferencing for therapeutic encounters, we employed a cross-sectional exploratory survey with 1490 respondents to understand how practitioners adapted to the changes. In this secondary analysis focused on the TR, we analyze the clinicians' (N = 448) spontaneous narratives about facets of the TR. Temporally, we focused on how these adaptations occurred during the initial part of the pandemic before vaccination was available and while the TR was still adapting to teletherapy videoconferencing under the duress of pandemic crises. We find three broad themes: (1) It is a \\\"much more remote relationship\\\"; (2) The \\\"connection…remains surprisingly strong\\\"; and (3) It is \\\"energetically taxing.\\\" Each reflects clinicians' views of the TR as altered, but surprisingly resilient. Although grateful for the safety of virtual therapeutic encounters, clinicians mourned the loss of an embodied encounter, experienced depletion of energy beyond Zoom fatigue, and nonetheless recognized their clients' and their own abilities to adapt.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Social Work Journal\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"325-336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9035977/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Social Work Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-022-00844-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/4/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Social Work Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-022-00844-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治疗关系(TR),包括其治疗框架,是治疗工作的基础。为了应对 COVID-19 大流行以及迅速过渡到视频会议治疗,我们对 1490 名受访者进行了横断面探索性调查,以了解从业人员如何适应这些变化。在这项以 TR 为重点的二次分析中,我们分析了临床医生(N = 448)关于 TR 各方面的自发叙述。从时间上看,我们关注的重点是,在疫苗接种之前的大流行初期,以及在大流行危机的压力下,当 TR 仍在适应远程治疗视频会议时,这些适应是如何发生的。我们发现了三大主题:(1) 这是一种 "更为遥远的关系";(2) "联系......仍然出奇地紧密";(3) "耗费精力"。每一项都反映了临床医生对 TR 的看法,即 TR 已被改变,但却具有惊人的复原力。尽管临床医生对虚拟治疗接触的安全性心存感激,但他们也为失去一次具体的接触而感到惋惜,经历了超出中度疲劳的能量消耗,并认识到他们的客户和他们自己的适应能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"There is Just a Different Energy": Changes in the Therapeutic Relationship with the Telehealth Transition.

The therapeutic relationship (TR), including its therapeutic frame, is the foundation of the therapeutic endeavor. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the rapid transition to videoconferencing for therapeutic encounters, we employed a cross-sectional exploratory survey with 1490 respondents to understand how practitioners adapted to the changes. In this secondary analysis focused on the TR, we analyze the clinicians' (N = 448) spontaneous narratives about facets of the TR. Temporally, we focused on how these adaptations occurred during the initial part of the pandemic before vaccination was available and while the TR was still adapting to teletherapy videoconferencing under the duress of pandemic crises. We find three broad themes: (1) It is a "much more remote relationship"; (2) The "connection…remains surprisingly strong"; and (3) It is "energetically taxing." Each reflects clinicians' views of the TR as altered, but surprisingly resilient. Although grateful for the safety of virtual therapeutic encounters, clinicians mourned the loss of an embodied encounter, experienced depletion of energy beyond Zoom fatigue, and nonetheless recognized their clients' and their own abilities to adapt.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Clinical Social Work Journal is an international forum devoted to the advancement of clinical knowledge and acumen of practitioners, educators, researchers, and policymakers. The journal, founded in 1973, publishes leading peer-reviewed original articles germane to contemporary clinical practice with individuals, couples, families, and groups, and welcomes submissions that reflect innovations in theoretical, practice , evidence-based clinical research, and interdisciplinary approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信