两种粘接剂对不同程度氟斑牙的显微形态分析及粘接强度比较

IF 1.68 Q2 Dentistry
Shuangfeng Liu, Yanxia Zhu, Tana Gegen
{"title":"两种粘接剂对不同程度氟斑牙的显微形态分析及粘接强度比较","authors":"Shuangfeng Liu,&nbsp;Yanxia Zhu,&nbsp;Tana Gegen","doi":"10.1186/s40563-020-00129-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The objective of this study was to analyze morphologically the all-etching bonding system and self-etching bonding system for enamel with different degrees of fluorosis and evaluate the bond strength of each system. Teeth that were indicated for extraction owing to orthodontic or periodontal problems were selected. According to Dean’s index and the Thylstrup-Fejerskov index, 180 extracted teeth were divided into three groups of mild, moderate, and severe dental fluorosis (DF), with 60 teeth in each group. The teeth in each group were randomly divided into two subgroups (n?=?30), which were then subjected to the all-etching bonding system (Prime &amp; Bond NT) and self-etching bonding system (SE-Bond). Each group of adhesives was used to bond Z350 universal resin (3?M) to the etched dental enamel. Tensile and shear tests were conducted to determine the bond strength. Subsequently, the fractured specimens were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The Prime &amp; Bond NT was statistically significant for the tensile and shear strength of enamel with mild fluorosis (<i>P</i>?&lt;?0.05) but did not exhibit a significant difference for moderate and severe DF (<i>P</i>?&gt;?0.05). The SE-Bond was not statistically significant for the tensile and shear strength of mild, moderate, or severe DF (<i>P</i>?&gt;?0.05). The SEM and CLSM results reveal that the mild fluorosis enamel crystals were relatively dense, and a small amount of resin remained. The moderate fluorosis enamel crystals were loosely arranged, and the gaps were widened. The severe fluorosis enamel crystals were irregularly arranged. The disorder was aggravated, and the dentinal orifice was exposed by partial enamel exfoliation. The bonding strength of mild fluorosis enamel with the Prime &amp; Bond NT was better than that with the SE-Bond, and cohesive failure was the most common mode of failure. Because there was no difference in the bonding strength of the SE-Bond for different degrees of DF, we recommend the use of the all-etching adhesive system in the clinical treatment of teeth with mild fluorosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":464,"journal":{"name":"Applied Adhesion Science","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6800,"publicationDate":"2020-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40563-020-00129-0","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Micromorphological analysis and bond strength comparison of two adhesives for different degrees of dental fluorosis\",\"authors\":\"Shuangfeng Liu,&nbsp;Yanxia Zhu,&nbsp;Tana Gegen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40563-020-00129-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The objective of this study was to analyze morphologically the all-etching bonding system and self-etching bonding system for enamel with different degrees of fluorosis and evaluate the bond strength of each system. Teeth that were indicated for extraction owing to orthodontic or periodontal problems were selected. According to Dean’s index and the Thylstrup-Fejerskov index, 180 extracted teeth were divided into three groups of mild, moderate, and severe dental fluorosis (DF), with 60 teeth in each group. The teeth in each group were randomly divided into two subgroups (n?=?30), which were then subjected to the all-etching bonding system (Prime &amp; Bond NT) and self-etching bonding system (SE-Bond). Each group of adhesives was used to bond Z350 universal resin (3?M) to the etched dental enamel. Tensile and shear tests were conducted to determine the bond strength. Subsequently, the fractured specimens were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The Prime &amp; Bond NT was statistically significant for the tensile and shear strength of enamel with mild fluorosis (<i>P</i>?&lt;?0.05) but did not exhibit a significant difference for moderate and severe DF (<i>P</i>?&gt;?0.05). The SE-Bond was not statistically significant for the tensile and shear strength of mild, moderate, or severe DF (<i>P</i>?&gt;?0.05). The SEM and CLSM results reveal that the mild fluorosis enamel crystals were relatively dense, and a small amount of resin remained. The moderate fluorosis enamel crystals were loosely arranged, and the gaps were widened. The severe fluorosis enamel crystals were irregularly arranged. The disorder was aggravated, and the dentinal orifice was exposed by partial enamel exfoliation. The bonding strength of mild fluorosis enamel with the Prime &amp; Bond NT was better than that with the SE-Bond, and cohesive failure was the most common mode of failure. Because there was no difference in the bonding strength of the SE-Bond for different degrees of DF, we recommend the use of the all-etching adhesive system in the clinical treatment of teeth with mild fluorosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Adhesion Science\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6800,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40563-020-00129-0\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Adhesion Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40563-020-00129-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Adhesion Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40563-020-00129-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究的目的是对不同程度氟斑牙釉质的全蚀结合系统和自蚀结合系统进行形态学分析,并对各系统的结合强度进行评价。选择因正畸或牙周问题而需要拔除的牙齿。根据Dean 's指数和Thylstrup-Fejerskov指数,将180颗拔牙分为轻度、中度、重度氟斑牙(DF)三组,每组60颗。每组牙齿随机分为2个亚组(n?=?30),然后进行全蚀刻粘接系统(Prime &键合NT)和自蚀刻键合系统(SE-Bond)。每组粘接剂用于将Z350通用树脂(3 μ M)粘接在蚀刻牙釉质上。进行了拉伸和剪切试验来确定粘结强度。随后,利用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)对断裂试样进行了研究。Prime &;轻度氟中毒牙釉质抗拉、抗剪强度Bond NT差异有统计学意义(P > 0.05),中度氟中毒牙釉质抗拉、抗剪强度Bond NT差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。SE-Bond在轻度、中度和重度DF的抗拉和剪切强度上无统计学意义(P >?0.05)。SEM和CLSM结果显示,轻度氟中毒牙釉质晶体相对致密,残留少量树脂。中度氟斑牙釉质晶体排列松散,间隙加宽。重度氟中毒牙釉质晶体排列不规则。病情加重,部分牙釉质脱落暴露牙本质孔。轻度氟斑牙釉质与Prime的结合强度研究Bond NT优于SE-Bond,粘结失效是最常见的失效模式。由于SE-Bond对不同DF度的粘接强度没有差异,我们建议在临床治疗轻度氟斑牙时使用全蚀刻粘接系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Micromorphological analysis and bond strength comparison of two adhesives for different degrees of dental fluorosis

Micromorphological analysis and bond strength comparison of two adhesives for different degrees of dental fluorosis

The objective of this study was to analyze morphologically the all-etching bonding system and self-etching bonding system for enamel with different degrees of fluorosis and evaluate the bond strength of each system. Teeth that were indicated for extraction owing to orthodontic or periodontal problems were selected. According to Dean’s index and the Thylstrup-Fejerskov index, 180 extracted teeth were divided into three groups of mild, moderate, and severe dental fluorosis (DF), with 60 teeth in each group. The teeth in each group were randomly divided into two subgroups (n?=?30), which were then subjected to the all-etching bonding system (Prime & Bond NT) and self-etching bonding system (SE-Bond). Each group of adhesives was used to bond Z350 universal resin (3?M) to the etched dental enamel. Tensile and shear tests were conducted to determine the bond strength. Subsequently, the fractured specimens were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The Prime & Bond NT was statistically significant for the tensile and shear strength of enamel with mild fluorosis (P?<?0.05) but did not exhibit a significant difference for moderate and severe DF (P?>?0.05). The SE-Bond was not statistically significant for the tensile and shear strength of mild, moderate, or severe DF (P?>?0.05). The SEM and CLSM results reveal that the mild fluorosis enamel crystals were relatively dense, and a small amount of resin remained. The moderate fluorosis enamel crystals were loosely arranged, and the gaps were widened. The severe fluorosis enamel crystals were irregularly arranged. The disorder was aggravated, and the dentinal orifice was exposed by partial enamel exfoliation. The bonding strength of mild fluorosis enamel with the Prime & Bond NT was better than that with the SE-Bond, and cohesive failure was the most common mode of failure. Because there was no difference in the bonding strength of the SE-Bond for different degrees of DF, we recommend the use of the all-etching adhesive system in the clinical treatment of teeth with mild fluorosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Adhesion Science
Applied Adhesion Science Dentistry-Dentistry (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Adhesion Science focuses on practical applications of adhesives, with special emphasis in fields such as oil industry, aerospace and biomedicine. Topics related to the phenomena of adhesion and the application of adhesive materials are welcome, especially in biomedical areas such as adhesive dentistry. Both theoretical and experimental works are considered for publication. Applied Adhesion Science is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. The journal''s open access policy offers a fast publication workflow whilst maintaining rigorous peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信