制度分析与非正式城市住区:一个基于制度主义的新产权视角的命题

IF 6 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Ephraim Kabunda Munshifwa
{"title":"制度分析与非正式城市住区:一个基于制度主义的新产权视角的命题","authors":"Ephraim Kabunda Munshifwa","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper proposes a generic process for conducting research on property rights in informal settlements from a new institutionalist perspective. The paper is premised on the fact that informal urban settlements have peculiar characteristics that complicate investigations using conventional methods. However, analytical approaches based on new institutionalism have gradually gained prominence over more traditional approaches amongst scholars in developing countries. New institutionalist methods of juxtaposing investigations of formal and informal institutions and relaxing some of the assumptions of conventional theories have enabled the inclusion of situations involving incomplete or imperfect property rights and positive transaction costs in the analysis. This paper shows that a “new institutionalist perspective” is not one coherent school of thought but rather a diverse group of theories with some common tenets dominated by three varieties of institutionalism, namely, rational choice, historical, and sociological. While a common framework would be ideal, this paper instead advocates for a dynamic research process that can be customised for examinations of property rights in different informal settlements, thus contributing to the literature by extending the application of new institutionalism to situations with “incomplete” property rights.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 106906"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional analysis and informal urban settlements: A proposition for a new institutionalist grounded property rights perspective\",\"authors\":\"Ephraim Kabunda Munshifwa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper proposes a generic process for conducting research on property rights in informal settlements from a new institutionalist perspective. The paper is premised on the fact that informal urban settlements have peculiar characteristics that complicate investigations using conventional methods. However, analytical approaches based on new institutionalism have gradually gained prominence over more traditional approaches amongst scholars in developing countries. New institutionalist methods of juxtaposing investigations of formal and informal institutions and relaxing some of the assumptions of conventional theories have enabled the inclusion of situations involving incomplete or imperfect property rights and positive transaction costs in the analysis. This paper shows that a “new institutionalist perspective” is not one coherent school of thought but rather a diverse group of theories with some common tenets dominated by three varieties of institutionalism, namely, rational choice, historical, and sociological. While a common framework would be ideal, this paper instead advocates for a dynamic research process that can be customised for examinations of property rights in different informal settlements, thus contributing to the literature by extending the application of new institutionalism to situations with “incomplete” property rights.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Land Use Policy\",\"volume\":\"134 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106906\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Land Use Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723003721\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723003721","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一个从新制度主义视角对非正规住区产权问题进行研究的一般过程。本文的前提是,非正规城市住区具有特殊的特征,使使用传统方法进行调查变得复杂。然而,在发展中国家的学者中,基于新制度主义的分析方法逐渐超过了更传统的方法。将正式制度和非正式制度的调查并列在一起的新制度主义方法,以及放松传统理论的一些假设,使得在分析中能够纳入涉及不完整或不完美产权和正交易成本的情况。本文表明,“新制度主义视角”不是一个连贯的学派,而是一组由理性选择、历史和社会学三种制度主义主导的具有共同原则的多样化理论。虽然一个共同的框架是理想的,但本文主张建立一个动态的研究过程,可以根据不同非正规住区的产权审查进行定制,从而通过将新制度主义的应用扩展到产权“不完整”的情况来为文献做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Institutional analysis and informal urban settlements: A proposition for a new institutionalist grounded property rights perspective

This paper proposes a generic process for conducting research on property rights in informal settlements from a new institutionalist perspective. The paper is premised on the fact that informal urban settlements have peculiar characteristics that complicate investigations using conventional methods. However, analytical approaches based on new institutionalism have gradually gained prominence over more traditional approaches amongst scholars in developing countries. New institutionalist methods of juxtaposing investigations of formal and informal institutions and relaxing some of the assumptions of conventional theories have enabled the inclusion of situations involving incomplete or imperfect property rights and positive transaction costs in the analysis. This paper shows that a “new institutionalist perspective” is not one coherent school of thought but rather a diverse group of theories with some common tenets dominated by three varieties of institutionalism, namely, rational choice, historical, and sociological. While a common framework would be ideal, this paper instead advocates for a dynamic research process that can be customised for examinations of property rights in different informal settlements, thus contributing to the literature by extending the application of new institutionalism to situations with “incomplete” property rights.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
553
期刊介绍: Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use. Land Use Policy examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信