重新评估撒哈拉以南非洲城市当局与非正规公共交通运营商之间的作用和关系:对五个城市的比较分析

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Timothy Durant , Mamaa Grant Monney , Michael Etonam Johnson , Kwame Kwakwa Osei , Joaquín Romero de Tejada , Herrie Schalekamp , Ansumana Tarawally
{"title":"重新评估撒哈拉以南非洲城市当局与非正规公共交通运营商之间的作用和关系:对五个城市的比较分析","authors":"Timothy Durant ,&nbsp;Mamaa Grant Monney ,&nbsp;Michael Etonam Johnson ,&nbsp;Kwame Kwakwa Osei ,&nbsp;Joaquín Romero de Tejada ,&nbsp;Herrie Schalekamp ,&nbsp;Ansumana Tarawally","doi":"10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Informal Public Transport (IPT) is the primary form of transport throughout Sub-Saharan Africa, responding dynamically to passenger needs, including those of the poorest travellers. Despite this form of collective transport's positive contribution to growing cities, there remain important negative aspects to be addressed, including strong competition for passengers, severe air pollution and poor safety records. The TRANSITIONS project (funded by UKAID) sought to better understand how IPT can be supported to deliver improved service quality, and investigated the relationship between public authorities and IPT operators in the five cities of Accra, Kumasi, Freetown, Cape Town and Maputo. Based on research activities that included stakeholder interviews and workshops, this paper compares the regulatory frameworks of the cities and their evolution. It finds that Cape Town has been an ‘early mover’ in terms of its attempts to professionalise and support the sector, but that self-regulation continues to play a significant role. Accra, Kumasi and Maputo have the main IPT licensing frameworks in place, but limited enforcement capacity and elements of corruption undermine this. Freetown is currently developing a regulatory structure for IPT, which is likely to be informed by major public transport schemes that are frequently seen as the catalyst for IPT professionalisation initiatives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47810,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Economics","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 101306"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-evaluating roles and relationships between city authorities and informal public transport operators in sub-saharan africa: A comparative analysis of five cities\",\"authors\":\"Timothy Durant ,&nbsp;Mamaa Grant Monney ,&nbsp;Michael Etonam Johnson ,&nbsp;Kwame Kwakwa Osei ,&nbsp;Joaquín Romero de Tejada ,&nbsp;Herrie Schalekamp ,&nbsp;Ansumana Tarawally\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Informal Public Transport (IPT) is the primary form of transport throughout Sub-Saharan Africa, responding dynamically to passenger needs, including those of the poorest travellers. Despite this form of collective transport's positive contribution to growing cities, there remain important negative aspects to be addressed, including strong competition for passengers, severe air pollution and poor safety records. The TRANSITIONS project (funded by UKAID) sought to better understand how IPT can be supported to deliver improved service quality, and investigated the relationship between public authorities and IPT operators in the five cities of Accra, Kumasi, Freetown, Cape Town and Maputo. Based on research activities that included stakeholder interviews and workshops, this paper compares the regulatory frameworks of the cities and their evolution. It finds that Cape Town has been an ‘early mover’ in terms of its attempts to professionalise and support the sector, but that self-regulation continues to play a significant role. Accra, Kumasi and Maputo have the main IPT licensing frameworks in place, but limited enforcement capacity and elements of corruption undermine this. Freetown is currently developing a regulatory structure for IPT, which is likely to be informed by major public transport schemes that are frequently seen as the catalyst for IPT professionalisation initiatives.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Transportation Economics\",\"volume\":\"101 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Transportation Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073988592300046X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073988592300046X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

非正规公共交通(IPT)是整个撒哈拉以南非洲的主要交通形式,对乘客需求(包括最贫穷的旅行者的需求)做出了动态响应。尽管这种形式的集体运输对不断发展的城市做出了积极贡献,但仍有一些重要的消极方面需要解决,包括乘客竞争激烈、空气污染严重和安全记录不佳。TRANSITIONS项目(由UKAID资助)旨在更好地了解如何支持IPT以提高服务质量,并调查了阿克拉、库马西、弗里敦、开普敦和马普托五个城市的公共当局与IPT运营商之间的关系。基于包括利益相关者访谈和研讨会在内的研究活动,本文比较了城市的监管框架及其演变。它发现,开普敦在努力使该行业专业化和支持方面是一个“先行者”,但自律仍在发挥重要作用。阿克拉、库马西和马普托有主要的IPT许可框架,但执法能力有限和腐败因素破坏了这一框架。弗里敦目前正在为IPT制定监管结构,主要公共交通方案可能会为其提供信息,这些方案经常被视为IPT专业化举措的催化剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Re-evaluating roles and relationships between city authorities and informal public transport operators in sub-saharan africa: A comparative analysis of five cities

Informal Public Transport (IPT) is the primary form of transport throughout Sub-Saharan Africa, responding dynamically to passenger needs, including those of the poorest travellers. Despite this form of collective transport's positive contribution to growing cities, there remain important negative aspects to be addressed, including strong competition for passengers, severe air pollution and poor safety records. The TRANSITIONS project (funded by UKAID) sought to better understand how IPT can be supported to deliver improved service quality, and investigated the relationship between public authorities and IPT operators in the five cities of Accra, Kumasi, Freetown, Cape Town and Maputo. Based on research activities that included stakeholder interviews and workshops, this paper compares the regulatory frameworks of the cities and their evolution. It finds that Cape Town has been an ‘early mover’ in terms of its attempts to professionalise and support the sector, but that self-regulation continues to play a significant role. Accra, Kumasi and Maputo have the main IPT licensing frameworks in place, but limited enforcement capacity and elements of corruption undermine this. Freetown is currently developing a regulatory structure for IPT, which is likely to be informed by major public transport schemes that are frequently seen as the catalyst for IPT professionalisation initiatives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
59
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Economics is a journal devoted to the dissemination of high quality economics research in the field of transportation. The content covers a wide variety of topics relating to the economics aspects of transportation, government regulatory policies regarding transportation, and issues of concern to transportation industry planners. The unifying theme throughout the papers is the application of economic theory and/or applied economic methodologies to transportation questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信