通过绿色服务化调节工业4.0和绿色实践之间的ESG合规性:考察其对绿色供应链绩效的影响

IF 11.1 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Mukesh Kumar , Rakesh D. Raut , Sachin Kumar Mangla , Soumyadeb Chowdhury , Vikas Kumar Choubey
{"title":"通过绿色服务化调节工业4.0和绿色实践之间的ESG合规性:考察其对绿色供应链绩效的影响","authors":"Mukesh Kumar ,&nbsp;Rakesh D. Raut ,&nbsp;Sachin Kumar Mangla ,&nbsp;Soumyadeb Chowdhury ,&nbsp;Vikas Kumar Choubey","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Servitization and Industry 4.0 are the two most significant issues in a recent study on manufacturing strategy changes for economic and sustainable growth. Questions were raised on how Industry 4.0 and green practices improve green supply chain performance with the mediation role of green servitization? Green servitization now addresses product service systems and environmental impacts. This study is crucial because environmental unpredictability is causing the supply chain to migrate toward green and digital supply chains, which reduce environmental impact and increase efficiency. The institutional and resource-based view theory-based research model checks the moderation of Environmental, social and government (ESG) compliance and the mediation role of green servitization for environmental advantages. It helps to develop a research model. Structural equation modeling applies to check the model and hypotheses' significance. The unique research model with the three hypotheses is validated with less than two-tailed 0.001 significance, showing that Industry 4.0 and green practices positively affect green servitization and green supply chain (GSC) performance while moderating ESG compliance. This research also reveals that green servitization mediates and ESG compliance moderates the association between Industry 4.0, green practices, and GSC performance. Based on our unique results, managers should adopt green servitization to boost GSC performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 102898"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moderating ESG compliance between industry 4.0 and green practices with green servitization: Examining its impact on green supply chain performance\",\"authors\":\"Mukesh Kumar ,&nbsp;Rakesh D. Raut ,&nbsp;Sachin Kumar Mangla ,&nbsp;Soumyadeb Chowdhury ,&nbsp;Vikas Kumar Choubey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Servitization and Industry 4.0 are the two most significant issues in a recent study on manufacturing strategy changes for economic and sustainable growth. Questions were raised on how Industry 4.0 and green practices improve green supply chain performance with the mediation role of green servitization? Green servitization now addresses product service systems and environmental impacts. This study is crucial because environmental unpredictability is causing the supply chain to migrate toward green and digital supply chains, which reduce environmental impact and increase efficiency. The institutional and resource-based view theory-based research model checks the moderation of Environmental, social and government (ESG) compliance and the mediation role of green servitization for environmental advantages. It helps to develop a research model. Structural equation modeling applies to check the model and hypotheses' significance. The unique research model with the three hypotheses is validated with less than two-tailed 0.001 significance, showing that Industry 4.0 and green practices positively affect green servitization and green supply chain (GSC) performance while moderating ESG compliance. This research also reveals that green servitization mediates and ESG compliance moderates the association between Industry 4.0, green practices, and GSC performance. Based on our unique results, managers should adopt green servitization to boost GSC performance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technovation\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102898\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497223002092\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497223002092","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

服务化和工业4.0是最近一项关于经济和可持续增长的制造业战略变化的研究中最重要的两个问题。有人提出了以下问题:工业4.0和绿色实践如何在绿色服务化的中介作用下提高绿色供应链绩效?绿色服务化现在涉及产品服务体系和环境影响。这项研究至关重要,因为环境的不可预测性正在导致供应链向绿色和数字供应链转移,从而减少环境影响并提高效率。基于制度和资源观理论的研究模型检验了环境、社会和政府(ESG)合规的适度性以及绿色服务化对环境优势的中介作用。它有助于开发研究模型。结构方程建模用于检验模型和假设的重要性。具有三个假设的独特研究模型以小于双尾0.001的显著性得到验证,表明工业4.0和绿色实践对绿色服务化和绿色供应链绩效产生了积极影响,同时调节了ESG合规性。这项研究还表明,绿色服务化起中介作用,ESG合规性调节工业4.0、绿色实践和GSC绩效之间的关联。基于我们独特的业绩,管理者应该采用绿色服务来提高GSC的业绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moderating ESG compliance between industry 4.0 and green practices with green servitization: Examining its impact on green supply chain performance

Servitization and Industry 4.0 are the two most significant issues in a recent study on manufacturing strategy changes for economic and sustainable growth. Questions were raised on how Industry 4.0 and green practices improve green supply chain performance with the mediation role of green servitization? Green servitization now addresses product service systems and environmental impacts. This study is crucial because environmental unpredictability is causing the supply chain to migrate toward green and digital supply chains, which reduce environmental impact and increase efficiency. The institutional and resource-based view theory-based research model checks the moderation of Environmental, social and government (ESG) compliance and the mediation role of green servitization for environmental advantages. It helps to develop a research model. Structural equation modeling applies to check the model and hypotheses' significance. The unique research model with the three hypotheses is validated with less than two-tailed 0.001 significance, showing that Industry 4.0 and green practices positively affect green servitization and green supply chain (GSC) performance while moderating ESG compliance. This research also reveals that green servitization mediates and ESG compliance moderates the association between Industry 4.0, green practices, and GSC performance. Based on our unique results, managers should adopt green servitization to boost GSC performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信