“各尽所能,保持距离”:美国州长新冠肺炎新闻发布会上的集体意向和集体行动

IF 2 2区 社会学 0 LITERATURE
Z.M. Kirgil, A. Voyer
{"title":"“各尽所能,保持距离”:美国州长新冠肺炎新闻发布会上的集体意向和集体行动","authors":"Z.M. Kirgil,&nbsp;A. Voyer","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2022.101668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This mixed-methods study examines how political leaders mobilize collective intentionality during the COVID-19 pandemic in nine US States, and how collective intentionality differs across republican and democratic administrations. The results of our computational and qualitative analyses show that i) political leaders establish collective intentionality by emphasizing unity, vulnerability, action, and community boundaries; ii) political leaders’ call to collective action clashes with the inaction required by health guidelines; iii) social inequalities received little attention across all states compared to other themes; and iv) collective intentionality in democratic administrations is linked to individuals’ agency and actions, suggesting a bottom-up approach. Conversely, in republican administrations individuals’ contributions are downplayed compared to work and state-level action, indicating a top-down approach. This study demonstrates the theoretical and empirical value of collective intentionality in sociological research, and contributes to a better understanding of leadership and prosociality in times of crisis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47900,"journal":{"name":"Poetics","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 101668"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304422X22000304/pdfft?md5=6f9654e2c98c17f36031339c4a04093c&pid=1-s2.0-S0304422X22000304-main.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Do your part: Stay apart”: Collective intentionality and collective (in)action in US governor's COVID-19 press conferences\",\"authors\":\"Z.M. Kirgil,&nbsp;A. Voyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.poetic.2022.101668\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This mixed-methods study examines how political leaders mobilize collective intentionality during the COVID-19 pandemic in nine US States, and how collective intentionality differs across republican and democratic administrations. The results of our computational and qualitative analyses show that i) political leaders establish collective intentionality by emphasizing unity, vulnerability, action, and community boundaries; ii) political leaders’ call to collective action clashes with the inaction required by health guidelines; iii) social inequalities received little attention across all states compared to other themes; and iv) collective intentionality in democratic administrations is linked to individuals’ agency and actions, suggesting a bottom-up approach. Conversely, in republican administrations individuals’ contributions are downplayed compared to work and state-level action, indicating a top-down approach. This study demonstrates the theoretical and empirical value of collective intentionality in sociological research, and contributes to a better understanding of leadership and prosociality in times of crisis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Poetics\",\"volume\":\"93 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101668\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304422X22000304/pdfft?md5=6f9654e2c98c17f36031339c4a04093c&pid=1-s2.0-S0304422X22000304-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Poetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304422X22000304\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poetics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304422X22000304","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

这项混合方法研究考察了在美国九个州的COVID-19大流行期间,政治领导人如何调动集体意向性,以及集体意向性在共和和民主政府之间的差异。我们的计算和定性分析结果表明,1)政治领导人通过强调团结、脆弱性、行动和社区边界来建立集体意向性;(二)政治领导人呼吁采取集体行动与卫生准则所要求的不作为相冲突;Iii)与其他主题相比,社会不平等在所有州都很少受到关注;民主管理中的集体意向性与个人的能动性和行动有关,这表明了一种自下而上的方法。相反,在共和党政府中,与工作和州一级的行动相比,个人的贡献被低估了,这表明了自上而下的方法。本研究证明了集体意向性在社会学研究中的理论和实证价值,有助于更好地理解危机时期的领导和亲社会性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

“Do your part: Stay apart”: Collective intentionality and collective (in)action in US governor's COVID-19 press conferences

“Do your part: Stay apart”: Collective intentionality and collective (in)action in US governor's COVID-19 press conferences

This mixed-methods study examines how political leaders mobilize collective intentionality during the COVID-19 pandemic in nine US States, and how collective intentionality differs across republican and democratic administrations. The results of our computational and qualitative analyses show that i) political leaders establish collective intentionality by emphasizing unity, vulnerability, action, and community boundaries; ii) political leaders’ call to collective action clashes with the inaction required by health guidelines; iii) social inequalities received little attention across all states compared to other themes; and iv) collective intentionality in democratic administrations is linked to individuals’ agency and actions, suggesting a bottom-up approach. Conversely, in republican administrations individuals’ contributions are downplayed compared to work and state-level action, indicating a top-down approach. This study demonstrates the theoretical and empirical value of collective intentionality in sociological research, and contributes to a better understanding of leadership and prosociality in times of crisis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Poetics
Poetics Multiple-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Poetics is an interdisciplinary journal of theoretical and empirical research on culture, the media and the arts. Particularly welcome are papers that make an original contribution to the major disciplines - sociology, psychology, media and communication studies, and economics - within which promising lines of research on culture, media and the arts have been developed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信